Predicting MRI-derived total brain volume from DXA-derived head composition in middle-aged and older adults: WASEDA'S Health Study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Toshiharu Tsutsui, Suguru Torii, Kumpei Tanisawa, Toru Takahashi, Kaori Usui, Nobuhiro Nakamura, Taishi Midorikawa, Kento Nakagawa, Reiji Ohkuma, Hiroaki Kumano, Kaori Ishii, Katsuhiko Suzuki, Shizuo Sakamoto, Mitsuru Higuchi, Koichiro Oka
{"title":"Predicting MRI-derived total brain volume from DXA-derived head composition in middle-aged and older adults: WASEDA'S Health Study.","authors":"Toshiharu Tsutsui, Suguru Torii, Kumpei Tanisawa, Toru Takahashi, Kaori Usui, Nobuhiro Nakamura, Taishi Midorikawa, Kento Nakagawa, Reiji Ohkuma, Hiroaki Kumano, Kaori Ishii, Katsuhiko Suzuki, Shizuo Sakamoto, Mitsuru Higuchi, Koichiro Oka","doi":"10.1186/s12880-026-02341-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total brain volume (TBV) derived from brain MRI is an important marker of brain structural health in middle-aged and older adults, but MRI is resource-intensive and not always feasible in largescale or repeated assessments. We examined whether dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived head composition measures can estimate MRI-derived TBV in middle-aged and older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 314 participants (≥ 40 years) who underwent whole-body DXA (head ROI manually defined using a sub-region tool) and 3T brain MRI within 1 year. MRI-derived TBV was defined as the sum of gray and white matter volumes. We developed multivariable linear regression models using either DXA-derived head lean-and-fat mass or head fat mass as the primary predictor. Nested models were fitted: Model 1 (predictor only), Model 2 (+ age and sex), and Model 3 (+ BMI). Apparent model performance was summarized using R² and RMSE, and internal validation was performed using 1,000 bootstrap resamples to obtain optimism-corrected performance estimates. Calibration was evaluated using calibration-in-the-large (CITL) and calibration slope. Agreement between observed and predicted TBV was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis. Sensitivity analyses additionally adjusted for the MRI-DXA measurement interval and evaluated sex-stratified performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Model 3 was treated as the prespecified primary model because it was the fully adjusted model including clinically relevant covariates. In Model 3, both head lean-and-fat mass and head fat mass were positively associated with TBV, whereas age was negatively associated and male sex was associated with larger TBV. Across the nested models, optimism-corrected bootstrap validation showed broadly similar performance, with numerically slightly higher R² values and lower RMSE values for Model 3. Calibration was favorable in both predictor-based primary models (CITL approximately 0; calibration slope approximately 1.00). Bland-Altman analyses showed small mean bias with evidence of proportional bias across the TBV range. Bootstrap validation indicated stable performance. Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results after accounting for measurement interval and across sex strata.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DXA-derived head composition measures can provide a practical approximation of MRI-derived TBV in middle-aged and older adults, with good calibration and stable internal validation performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02341-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Total brain volume (TBV) derived from brain MRI is an important marker of brain structural health in middle-aged and older adults, but MRI is resource-intensive and not always feasible in largescale or repeated assessments. We examined whether dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived head composition measures can estimate MRI-derived TBV in middle-aged and older adults.

Methods: This study included 314 participants (≥ 40 years) who underwent whole-body DXA (head ROI manually defined using a sub-region tool) and 3T brain MRI within 1 year. MRI-derived TBV was defined as the sum of gray and white matter volumes. We developed multivariable linear regression models using either DXA-derived head lean-and-fat mass or head fat mass as the primary predictor. Nested models were fitted: Model 1 (predictor only), Model 2 (+ age and sex), and Model 3 (+ BMI). Apparent model performance was summarized using R² and RMSE, and internal validation was performed using 1,000 bootstrap resamples to obtain optimism-corrected performance estimates. Calibration was evaluated using calibration-in-the-large (CITL) and calibration slope. Agreement between observed and predicted TBV was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis. Sensitivity analyses additionally adjusted for the MRI-DXA measurement interval and evaluated sex-stratified performance.

Results: Model 3 was treated as the prespecified primary model because it was the fully adjusted model including clinically relevant covariates. In Model 3, both head lean-and-fat mass and head fat mass were positively associated with TBV, whereas age was negatively associated and male sex was associated with larger TBV. Across the nested models, optimism-corrected bootstrap validation showed broadly similar performance, with numerically slightly higher R² values and lower RMSE values for Model 3. Calibration was favorable in both predictor-based primary models (CITL approximately 0; calibration slope approximately 1.00). Bland-Altman analyses showed small mean bias with evidence of proportional bias across the TBV range. Bootstrap validation indicated stable performance. Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results after accounting for measurement interval and across sex strata.

Conclusions: DXA-derived head composition measures can provide a practical approximation of MRI-derived TBV in middle-aged and older adults, with good calibration and stable internal validation performance.

从dxa衍生的头部成分预测中老年人mri衍生的总脑容量:WASEDA的健康研究
背景:脑MRI所得的脑总容量(TBV)是中老年人群脑结构健康的重要指标,但MRI是资源密集型的,在大规模或重复评估中并不总是可行的。我们研究了双能x线吸收仪(DXA)衍生的头部成分测量是否可以估计中老年人mri衍生的TBV。方法:本研究包括314名参与者(≥40岁),他们在1年内接受了全身DXA(使用子区域工具手动定义头部ROI)和3T脑MRI。mri衍生的TBV定义为灰质和白质体积的总和。我们开发了多变量线性回归模型,使用dxa衍生的头部瘦肉和脂肪质量或头部脂肪质量作为主要预测因子。拟合嵌套模型:模型1(仅预测因子),模型2(+年龄和性别)和模型3 (+ BMI)。使用R²和RMSE对模型的表观性能进行总结,并使用1,000个bootstrap样本进行内部验证,以获得乐观修正的性能估计。采用大规模校准(CITL)和校准斜率对校准进行评估。观察到的TBV和预测的TBV之间的一致性使用Bland-Altman分析进行评估。敏感性分析还对MRI-DXA测量间隔进行了调整,并评估了性别分层的表现。结果:模型3是包含临床相关协变量的完全调整模型,因此被视为预设的主要模型。在模型3中,头部瘦膘质量和头部脂肪质量与TBV均呈正相关,而年龄与TBV呈负相关,男性与TBV较大相关。在嵌套模型中,乐观修正的bootstrap验证显示出大致相似的性能,模型3的数值R²值略高,RMSE值较低。在两个基于预测因子的初级模型(CITL约为0;校准斜率约为1.00)中,校准都是有利的。Bland-Altman分析显示小的平均偏倚,在TBV范围内存在比例偏倚的证据。引导验证表明性能稳定。在考虑了测量间隔和跨性别阶层后,敏感性分析得出了类似的结果。结论:dxa衍生的头部成分测量方法可以为中老年人mri衍生的TBV提供实用的近似值,具有良好的校准和稳定的内部验证性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书