Devangi Mehta, William Wargin, Stephanie Wallace-Teliz, Lauren F Stevenson, Greg Rigdon
{"title":"Rethinking immunogenicity: an integrated approach reveals the PK/PD impact of pre-existing and drug-sustaining ADA.","authors":"Devangi Mehta, William Wargin, Stephanie Wallace-Teliz, Lauren F Stevenson, Greg Rigdon","doi":"10.1080/17576180.2026.2667854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The traditional immunogenicity paradigm resulting in anti-drug antibody (ADA) and neutralizing antibody (NAb) positive/negative status and ambiguous or imprecise titers may overlook clinically relevant effects of ADA on pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD). Employing risk-based strategies that integrate PK and PD analyses with ADA magnitude using signal-to-noise (S/N) can provide early insight into potential clinical impact of immunogenicity.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In a Phase 1 evaluation of DLX-2323, a humanized single-chain variable fragment (scFv) antibody that binds human IL-1β, ADA-sensitive PK and PD assays were employed to measure DLX-2323 concentration, PD activity, and assess the impact of ADA on PK and PD in healthy participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The presence of pre-existing ADA was observed in one-third of participants and resulted in high variability of DLX-2323 exposure and PD activity. Pre-existing ADA magnitude correlated with a drug-sustaining impact on PK and PD, with lower clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (Vd/F) of DLX-2323 relative to increasing ADA signal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the immunogenicity risk assessment, the use of ADA-sensitive free PK and PD assays to measure <i>in vivo</i> ADA effects on drug exposure and PD activity provided clinically meaningful information that standalone neutralizing antibody assays could not.</p>","PeriodicalId":8797,"journal":{"name":"Bioanalysis","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2026.2667854","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: The traditional immunogenicity paradigm resulting in anti-drug antibody (ADA) and neutralizing antibody (NAb) positive/negative status and ambiguous or imprecise titers may overlook clinically relevant effects of ADA on pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD). Employing risk-based strategies that integrate PK and PD analyses with ADA magnitude using signal-to-noise (S/N) can provide early insight into potential clinical impact of immunogenicity.
Materials and methods: In a Phase 1 evaluation of DLX-2323, a humanized single-chain variable fragment (scFv) antibody that binds human IL-1β, ADA-sensitive PK and PD assays were employed to measure DLX-2323 concentration, PD activity, and assess the impact of ADA on PK and PD in healthy participants.
Results: The presence of pre-existing ADA was observed in one-third of participants and resulted in high variability of DLX-2323 exposure and PD activity. Pre-existing ADA magnitude correlated with a drug-sustaining impact on PK and PD, with lower clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (Vd/F) of DLX-2323 relative to increasing ADA signal.
Conclusions: Based on the immunogenicity risk assessment, the use of ADA-sensitive free PK and PD assays to measure in vivo ADA effects on drug exposure and PD activity provided clinically meaningful information that standalone neutralizing antibody assays could not.
BioanalysisBIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍:
Reliable data obtained from selective, sensitive and reproducible analysis of xenobiotics and biotics in biological samples is a fundamental and crucial part of every successful drug development program. The same principles can also apply to many other areas of research such as forensic science, toxicology and sports doping testing.
The bioanalytical field incorporates sophisticated techniques linking sample preparation and advanced separations with MS and NMR detection systems, automation and robotics. Standards set by regulatory bodies regarding method development and validation increasingly define the boundaries between speed and quality.
Bioanalysis is a progressive discipline for which the future holds many exciting opportunities to further reduce sample volumes, analysis cost and environmental impact, as well as to improve sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, efficiency, assay throughput, data quality, data handling and processing.
The journal Bioanalysis focuses on the techniques and methods used for the detection or quantitative study of analytes in human or animal biological samples. Bioanalysis encourages the submission of articles describing forward-looking applications, including biosensors, microfluidics, miniaturized analytical devices, and new hyphenated and multi-dimensional techniques.
Bioanalysis delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats. Key advances in the field are reported and analyzed by international experts, providing an authoritative but accessible forum for the modern bioanalyst.