{"title":"Workplace Productivity Cost Associated With Psychological Distress in the United States.","authors":"Abay Asfaw, Toni Alterman, Regina Pana-Cryan","doi":"10.1002/ajim.70085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Psychological distress (PD) is negatively associated with workplace productivity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the potential workplace productivity cost of PD related to absenteeism and presenteeism in the United States, and to break down this cost by broad industry sector.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used data from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey, which included questions on absenteeism and presenteeism, and applied a human capital approach to quantify absenteeism and presenteeism cost associated with PD. We measured PD using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) and categorized the presence or severity of PD as: no (K6 = 0), mild (K6 = 1-4), moderate (K6 = 5-12), and severe (K6 ≥ 13) PD. We used workers reporting no PD as the reference group. Our regression models included sociodemographic, economic, health, and workplace covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2021, 16,356 sampled adults represented 151 million US workers. Among these workers, 3.8 million (2.5%) reported experiencing severe, 24.0 million (15.9%) moderate, and 57.4 million (38.0%) mild PD. Our regression estimates suggest that the total PD-related absenteeism and presenteeism cost that year was between United States Dollars (USD) 90.1 and 118.2 billion, excluding additional costs related to injury, turnover, disability claims, and early retirement. We also observed statistically significant differences in estimated total and per-worker cost of PD across seven broad industry sectors. Total PD-related cost was highest in the services sector (USD 53.9 billion), followed by healthcare and social assistance (USD 19.7 billion) and wholesale and retail trade (USD 12.4 billion). On a per-worker basis, we observed the highest cost in healthcare and social assistance (USD 950), services (USD 732), and wholesale and retail trade (USD 731).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings showed large and uneven burden of PD across different industries manifested through absenteeism and presenteeism. This burden may be reduced, and productivity enhanced, through improvement in work organization, the implementation of psychosocial risk management strategies, and the expansion of mental health interventions. Investments in workplace mental health may generate returns comparable to other capital investments largely through lowering absenteeism and presenteeism costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of industrial medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.70085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Psychological distress (PD) is negatively associated with workplace productivity.
Objective: To estimate the potential workplace productivity cost of PD related to absenteeism and presenteeism in the United States, and to break down this cost by broad industry sector.
Method: We used data from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey, which included questions on absenteeism and presenteeism, and applied a human capital approach to quantify absenteeism and presenteeism cost associated with PD. We measured PD using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) and categorized the presence or severity of PD as: no (K6 = 0), mild (K6 = 1-4), moderate (K6 = 5-12), and severe (K6 ≥ 13) PD. We used workers reporting no PD as the reference group. Our regression models included sociodemographic, economic, health, and workplace covariates.
Results: In 2021, 16,356 sampled adults represented 151 million US workers. Among these workers, 3.8 million (2.5%) reported experiencing severe, 24.0 million (15.9%) moderate, and 57.4 million (38.0%) mild PD. Our regression estimates suggest that the total PD-related absenteeism and presenteeism cost that year was between United States Dollars (USD) 90.1 and 118.2 billion, excluding additional costs related to injury, turnover, disability claims, and early retirement. We also observed statistically significant differences in estimated total and per-worker cost of PD across seven broad industry sectors. Total PD-related cost was highest in the services sector (USD 53.9 billion), followed by healthcare and social assistance (USD 19.7 billion) and wholesale and retail trade (USD 12.4 billion). On a per-worker basis, we observed the highest cost in healthcare and social assistance (USD 950), services (USD 732), and wholesale and retail trade (USD 731).
Conclusion: Our findings showed large and uneven burden of PD across different industries manifested through absenteeism and presenteeism. This burden may be reduced, and productivity enhanced, through improvement in work organization, the implementation of psychosocial risk management strategies, and the expansion of mental health interventions. Investments in workplace mental health may generate returns comparable to other capital investments largely through lowering absenteeism and presenteeism costs.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Industrial Medicine considers for publication reports of original research, review articles, instructive case reports, and analyses of policy in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety. The Journal also accepts commentaries, book reviews and letters of comment and criticism. The goals of the journal are to advance and disseminate knowledge, promote research and foster the prevention of disease and injury. Specific topics of interest include: occupational disease; environmental disease; pesticides; cancer; occupational epidemiology; environmental epidemiology; disease surveillance systems; ergonomics; dust diseases; lead poisoning; neurotoxicology; endocrine disruptors.