Prophylactic half-dose platelet transfusion effect on thrombocytopenia, transfusion, and bleeding occurrence in patients with hematologic disease.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Christine M Cahill, Bianca Santonastaso, Madelyn Gatchell, Hannah Spector, Neil Blumberg, Phuong-Lan T Nguyen, Akua Asante, Debra Masel, Aimee Kievitt, Kelly Henrichs, Majed A Refaai
{"title":"Prophylactic half-dose platelet transfusion effect on thrombocytopenia, transfusion, and bleeding occurrence in patients with hematologic disease.","authors":"Christine M Cahill, Bianca Santonastaso, Madelyn Gatchell, Hannah Spector, Neil Blumberg, Phuong-Lan T Nguyen, Akua Asante, Debra Masel, Aimee Kievitt, Kelly Henrichs, Majed A Refaai","doi":"10.1093/ajcp/aqag032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To provide the lowest effective dose and minimize toxicity, our transfusion service initiated the use of a half-dose for all prophylactic inpatient platelet transfusions. The main rationale for this change in dose was the lack of evidence of increased bleeding and mortality in lower-dose platelet transfusion. Since the current platelet dose is not evidence based, and dose and toxicity are linked for most therapeutics, this approach to reducing adverse effects made scientific and clinical sense. In addition, many blood centers have experienced platelet shortages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included nonbleeding patients older than 50 years with a diagnosed hematologic disease who received prophylactic platelet transfusions and were admitted to our inpatient cancer center between November 1, 2023, and January 1, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly lower volumes of platelets (153 vs 313 mL, P < .0001; 95% CI, 153-166) were administered to the study cohort (n = 310) vs the control (n = 301). No significant differences were seen in the number of transfusion events per hospitalization of platelets (4.4 vs 4.1, P = .7; 95% CI, -2.2 to 1.5) and red blood cells (5.9 vs 7.5, P = .29; 95% CI, -1.4 to 4.7). The mean platelet counts were similar between both groups in pretransfusion (10.3 vs 10 × 109/L, P = .73; 95% CI, -1.8 to 1.3) and posttransfusion (13.8 vs 15.9 × 109/L, P = .16; 95% CI, -0.88 to 5.1). Bleeding event frequency was also similar between both groups (1.6% vs 1.3%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Half-dose platelets appear to be safe and effective in nonbleeding patients receiving prophylactic transfusions. This strategy reduces patient exposure to potentially harmful higher-dose transfusions without increasing bleeding events or red blood cell transfusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7506,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical pathology","volume":"165 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqag032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To provide the lowest effective dose and minimize toxicity, our transfusion service initiated the use of a half-dose for all prophylactic inpatient platelet transfusions. The main rationale for this change in dose was the lack of evidence of increased bleeding and mortality in lower-dose platelet transfusion. Since the current platelet dose is not evidence based, and dose and toxicity are linked for most therapeutics, this approach to reducing adverse effects made scientific and clinical sense. In addition, many blood centers have experienced platelet shortages.

Methods: This retrospective study included nonbleeding patients older than 50 years with a diagnosed hematologic disease who received prophylactic platelet transfusions and were admitted to our inpatient cancer center between November 1, 2023, and January 1, 2024.

Results: Significantly lower volumes of platelets (153 vs 313 mL, P < .0001; 95% CI, 153-166) were administered to the study cohort (n = 310) vs the control (n = 301). No significant differences were seen in the number of transfusion events per hospitalization of platelets (4.4 vs 4.1, P = .7; 95% CI, -2.2 to 1.5) and red blood cells (5.9 vs 7.5, P = .29; 95% CI, -1.4 to 4.7). The mean platelet counts were similar between both groups in pretransfusion (10.3 vs 10 × 109/L, P = .73; 95% CI, -1.8 to 1.3) and posttransfusion (13.8 vs 15.9 × 109/L, P = .16; 95% CI, -0.88 to 5.1). Bleeding event frequency was also similar between both groups (1.6% vs 1.3%, respectively).

Conclusions: Half-dose platelets appear to be safe and effective in nonbleeding patients receiving prophylactic transfusions. This strategy reduces patient exposure to potentially harmful higher-dose transfusions without increasing bleeding events or red blood cell transfusions.

预防性半剂量血小板输注对血液病患者血小板减少、输血和出血的影响。
目的:为了提供最低有效剂量和最小化毒性,我们的输血服务开始使用半剂量的预防性住院患者血小板输注。这种剂量变化的主要理由是缺乏证据表明低剂量血小板输注会增加出血和死亡率。由于目前的血小板剂量没有证据基础,并且大多数治疗方法的剂量和毒性是相关联的,因此这种减少不良反应的方法具有科学和临床意义。此外,许多血液中心都存在血小板短缺的问题。方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了2023年11月1日至2024年1月1日期间在我们的住院癌症中心接受预防性血小板输注的50岁以上确诊血液病的非出血患者。结果:血小板体积显著降低(153 mL vs 313 mL, P)结论:半剂量血小板对于接受预防性输血的非出血患者似乎是安全有效的。该策略减少了患者暴露于潜在有害的高剂量输血,而不会增加出血事件或红细胞输注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Clinical Pathology (AJCP) is the official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pathology and the Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists. It is a leading international journal for publication of articles concerning novel anatomic pathology and laboratory medicine observations on human disease. AJCP emphasizes articles that focus on the application of evolving technologies for the diagnosis and characterization of diseases and conditions, as well as those that have a direct link toward improving patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书