Biogenic carbon dioxide storage and mineral carbonation uptake in EU buildings.

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Dominik Steinberger-Maierhofer, Nicolas Alaux, Delphine Ramon, Semjon Popek, Tajda Potrč Obrecht, Judit Kockat, Xiaoyang Zhong, Alessio Mastrucci, Marcella Ruschi Mendes Saade, Karen Allacker, Alexander Passer, Martin Röck
{"title":"Biogenic carbon dioxide storage and mineral carbonation uptake in EU buildings.","authors":"Dominik Steinberger-Maierhofer, Nicolas Alaux, Delphine Ramon, Semjon Popek, Tajda Potrč Obrecht, Judit Kockat, Xiaoyang Zhong, Alessio Mastrucci, Marcella Ruschi Mendes Saade, Karen Allacker, Alexander Passer, Martin Röck","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.129794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Storing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) in products is identified as one of the key measures for carbon dioxide removal. The building sector and its potential use as a carbon sink is quickly becoming a consideration for active policies in Europe. However, while this remains a key element of informed decision-making, robust data on CO<sub>2</sub> storage and uptake potentials vis-à-vis current greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the buildings sector is still lacking. Here, we quantify the carbon dioxide storage and uptake potentials for EU buildings in 2020 on three hierarchical levels: the material, building, and building stock level. We assess the potential of bio-based materials and mineral carbonation and compare the results to the baseline GHG emissions of the EU building stock. At the building level, bio-based materials show the largest storage effects. Carbonation during the use stage of buildings is smaller than in the end-of-life stage, yet both yield non-negligible effects that should be considered in life cycle assessments of buildings. However, when calcination emissions in the production stage are considered, the carbonation uptake of mineral materials does not lead to net removal of CO<sub>2</sub> at the building level. At the building stock level, net biogenic carbon storage effects result in net storage equivalent to 1.27% of embodied GHG emissions, while mineral CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes, including carbonation, result in net emissions equivalent to 10.16% of embodied GHG emissions in the EU-27 building stock in 2020. The results at the material, building, and building stock levels can be used as a comparative baseline for future net-zero GHG research in the European context.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"407 ","pages":"129794"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.129794","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Storing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) in products is identified as one of the key measures for carbon dioxide removal. The building sector and its potential use as a carbon sink is quickly becoming a consideration for active policies in Europe. However, while this remains a key element of informed decision-making, robust data on CO2 storage and uptake potentials vis-à-vis current greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the buildings sector is still lacking. Here, we quantify the carbon dioxide storage and uptake potentials for EU buildings in 2020 on three hierarchical levels: the material, building, and building stock level. We assess the potential of bio-based materials and mineral carbonation and compare the results to the baseline GHG emissions of the EU building stock. At the building level, bio-based materials show the largest storage effects. Carbonation during the use stage of buildings is smaller than in the end-of-life stage, yet both yield non-negligible effects that should be considered in life cycle assessments of buildings. However, when calcination emissions in the production stage are considered, the carbonation uptake of mineral materials does not lead to net removal of CO2 at the building level. At the building stock level, net biogenic carbon storage effects result in net storage equivalent to 1.27% of embodied GHG emissions, while mineral CO2 fluxes, including carbonation, result in net emissions equivalent to 10.16% of embodied GHG emissions in the EU-27 building stock in 2020. The results at the material, building, and building stock levels can be used as a comparative baseline for future net-zero GHG research in the European context.

欧盟建筑中的生物二氧化碳储存和矿物碳化吸收。
将大气中的二氧化碳(CO2)储存在产品中被认为是去除二氧化碳的关键措施之一。建筑行业及其作为碳汇的潜在用途正迅速成为欧洲积极政策的考虑因素。然而,虽然这仍然是明智决策的关键因素,但关于二氧化碳储存和吸收潜力的可靠数据相对于-à-vis目前建筑部门的温室气体(GHG)排放仍然缺乏。在这里,我们在三个层次上量化了2020年欧盟建筑的二氧化碳储存和吸收潜力:材料、建筑和建筑库存水平。我们评估了生物基材料和矿物碳化的潜力,并将结果与欧盟建筑存量的基线温室气体排放进行了比较。在建筑层面,生物基材料表现出最大的储存效果。建筑物使用阶段的碳化作用比寿命终止阶段的碳化作用要小,但两者都会产生不可忽略的影响,应在建筑物的生命周期评估中予以考虑。然而,当考虑到生产阶段的煅烧排放时,矿物材料的碳化吸收不会导致建筑水平的二氧化碳净去除。在建筑存量层面,生物碳净储存效应导致的净储存相当于隐含温室气体排放的1.27%,而矿物二氧化碳通量,包括碳化作用,导致的净排放相当于欧盟27国建筑存量2020年隐含温室气体排放的10.16%。材料、建筑和建筑存量水平的结果可作为欧洲未来净零温室气体研究的比较基线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书