Microclimate-based oviposition site selection in butterflies and moths

IF 10.9 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Biological Reviews Pub Date : 2026-09-03 Epub Date: 2026-05-05 DOI:10.1002/brv.70182
Simon Braem, Thomas Fartmann, Hans Van Dyck
{"title":"Microclimate-based oviposition site selection in butterflies and moths","authors":"Simon Braem,&nbsp;Thomas Fartmann,&nbsp;Hans Van Dyck","doi":"10.1002/brv.70182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The sites herbivorous insects select to deposit eggs determine to a variable degree the environment their larvae will experience during development. Therefore, oviposition site selection should be seen as a significant life-history trait affecting the survival of the offspring. While searching for suitable sites, egg-laying terrestrial insects are predicted to respond to environmental factors that function as indicators for larval development and survival. In herbivorous insects, such as butterflies and moths, microclimate may be of significance for the selection of a suitable host plant or specific host plant parts. Although the preference–performance hypothesis attracted much interest in insects to address host plant species generalism <i>versus</i> specialism, a synthetic review on the diversity and functional relevance of microclimate-based oviposition site selection (MBOSS) is lacking for the Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths). Temperature and humidity are of ecological significance throughout their life cycle, but the role of oviposition site selection for larval development and survival may vary considerably. In this review, we conducted a literature survey of studies on the Lepidoptera that analysed oviposition site selection in the field and that tested for MBOSS relationships in natural habitats. We focused on the following questions: (<i>i</i>) how common is MBOSS in butterflies and moths; (<i>ii</i>) to what extent does the preference–performance hypothesis apply for MBOSS in this group of insects; and (<i>iii</i>) what is the relevance of MBOSS relationships for conservation principles and conservation management? In 89% of the tested cases, evidence for MBOSS was found, although there was a strong bias towards studies on temperate-zone butterfly species. By contrast, moths and tropical butterflies were understudied. Several moth studies did not provide support for the MBOSS hypothesis. Whether MBOSS occurred relative to warmer, cooler or thermally more buffered sites depended on: (<i>i</i>) the spatial scale at which MBOSS was tested; and (<i>ii</i>) regional climatic conditions. Vegetation type (i.e. forest <i>versus</i> non-forest habitats) was not significantly predictive for the type of MBOSS. However, when analysed in a case-by-case manner, vegetation type often clarified the ecological circumstances under which MBOSS was observed. There was a high prevalence of oviposition site selection for warmer microclimates than the thermal conditions of the surrounding environment. Understanding microclimate-mediated behavioural interactions with the environment is a key component for understanding resource-centred functional habitat and movement patterns to spread eggs in herbivorous insects. This small-scale component of habitat heterogeneity (including post-disturbed early-successional microhabitats) is key for understanding functional habitat use in butterflies and moths and is of high relevance for conservation and restoration management of their habitats in natural and anthropogenic landscapes. We identify outstanding questions and discuss new perspectives for the ecology and evolution of oviposition site selection, as well as for species conservation under human-induced rapid environmental change.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":"101 5","pages":"2359-2378"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brv.70182","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The sites herbivorous insects select to deposit eggs determine to a variable degree the environment their larvae will experience during development. Therefore, oviposition site selection should be seen as a significant life-history trait affecting the survival of the offspring. While searching for suitable sites, egg-laying terrestrial insects are predicted to respond to environmental factors that function as indicators for larval development and survival. In herbivorous insects, such as butterflies and moths, microclimate may be of significance for the selection of a suitable host plant or specific host plant parts. Although the preference–performance hypothesis attracted much interest in insects to address host plant species generalism versus specialism, a synthetic review on the diversity and functional relevance of microclimate-based oviposition site selection (MBOSS) is lacking for the Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths). Temperature and humidity are of ecological significance throughout their life cycle, but the role of oviposition site selection for larval development and survival may vary considerably. In this review, we conducted a literature survey of studies on the Lepidoptera that analysed oviposition site selection in the field and that tested for MBOSS relationships in natural habitats. We focused on the following questions: (i) how common is MBOSS in butterflies and moths; (ii) to what extent does the preference–performance hypothesis apply for MBOSS in this group of insects; and (iii) what is the relevance of MBOSS relationships for conservation principles and conservation management? In 89% of the tested cases, evidence for MBOSS was found, although there was a strong bias towards studies on temperate-zone butterfly species. By contrast, moths and tropical butterflies were understudied. Several moth studies did not provide support for the MBOSS hypothesis. Whether MBOSS occurred relative to warmer, cooler or thermally more buffered sites depended on: (i) the spatial scale at which MBOSS was tested; and (ii) regional climatic conditions. Vegetation type (i.e. forest versus non-forest habitats) was not significantly predictive for the type of MBOSS. However, when analysed in a case-by-case manner, vegetation type often clarified the ecological circumstances under which MBOSS was observed. There was a high prevalence of oviposition site selection for warmer microclimates than the thermal conditions of the surrounding environment. Understanding microclimate-mediated behavioural interactions with the environment is a key component for understanding resource-centred functional habitat and movement patterns to spread eggs in herbivorous insects. This small-scale component of habitat heterogeneity (including post-disturbed early-successional microhabitats) is key for understanding functional habitat use in butterflies and moths and is of high relevance for conservation and restoration management of their habitats in natural and anthropogenic landscapes. We identify outstanding questions and discuss new perspectives for the ecology and evolution of oviposition site selection, as well as for species conservation under human-induced rapid environmental change.

基于小气候的蝴蝶和飞蛾产卵地点选择。
食草昆虫选择产卵的地点在不同程度上决定了它们的幼虫在发育过程中所经历的环境。因此,产卵地点选择应被视为影响后代生存的重要生活史特征。在寻找合适的产卵地点时,预测陆生昆虫对环境因素的反应是幼虫发育和存活的指标。在蝴蝶和飞蛾等草食性昆虫中,小气候可能对选择合适的寄主植物或寄主植物的特定部位具有重要意义。尽管偏好-表现假说引起了昆虫界对寄主植物物种普遍性与专一性的兴趣,但对鳞翅目(蝴蝶和飞蛾)基于小气候的产卵选址(MBOSS)的多样性和功能相关性的综合综述尚缺乏。温度和湿度在其整个生命周期中都具有重要的生态意义,但产卵地点选择对幼虫发育和生存的作用可能有很大差异。本文对鳞翅目昆虫在野外产卵选择和自然生境中MBOSS关系的研究进行了综述。我们重点研究了以下问题:(i) MBOSS在蝴蝶和飞蛾中有多普遍;(ii)偏好-绩效假说在多大程度上适用于这类昆虫的MBOSS;以及(iii) MBOSS关系对保育原则和保育管理有何相关性?在89%的测试案例中,发现了MBOSS的证据,尽管对温带蝴蝶物种的研究存在强烈的偏见。相比之下,对飞蛾和热带蝴蝶的研究不足。一些蛾类研究没有为MBOSS假说提供支持。MBOSS是否发生在较暖、较冷或热缓冲程度较高的地点取决于:(i) MBOSS测试的空间尺度;(二)区域气候条件。植被类型(即森林与非森林生境)对MBOSS类型无显著预测作用。然而,当以个案的方式分析时,植被类型往往澄清了观察到MBOSS的生态环境。在温暖的小气候条件下,产卵地点选择的盛行率高于周围环境的热条件。了解小气候介导的行为与环境的相互作用是了解以资源为中心的功能栖息地和草食性昆虫产卵的运动模式的关键组成部分。这种生境异质性的小尺度组成部分(包括干扰后早期演替微生境)是了解蝴蝶和飞蛾生境功能利用的关键,对自然和人为景观中蝴蝶和飞蛾生境的保护和恢复管理具有重要意义。我们发现了突出的问题,并讨论了在人类引起的快速环境变化下,产卵地点选择的生态学和进化,以及物种保护的新观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Reviews
Biological Reviews 生物-生物学
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly. The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions. The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field. Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书