Characterising Ecosystem Composition, Structure and Function of Alternative Stable States in Temperate Forests of South-Eastern Australia.

IF 12 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Aaron E Heap, Tom A Fairman, Trent D Penman, Lauren T Bennett
{"title":"Characterising Ecosystem Composition, Structure and Function of Alternative Stable States in Temperate Forests of South-Eastern Australia.","authors":"Aaron E Heap, Tom A Fairman, Trent D Penman, Lauren T Bennett","doi":"10.1111/gcb.70895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increasingly frequent and intense wildfires threaten to push ecosystems beyond their ecological thresholds. Fire-adapted forests can be vulnerable to ecosystem conversion under shortening fire-return intervals. To evaluate the impacts of fire regime change, we contrasted Eucalyptus forests that retained canopy cover under tolerable regimes (reference forests) with alternative states of markedly reduced canopy. These alternative states established following short-interval wildfires and have persisted through subsequent fires. Alternative states were dominated by more uniform distributions of small trees (< 20 cm diameter) than reference states, with 97% fewer large trees (> 20 cm diameter). These changes in structure translated into declines in several key ecosystem functions. The loss of large, hollow-forming trees and limited Eucalyptus regeneration indicate long-term constraints on habitat availability for hollow-dependent fauna. Coarse woody debris mass was 38% lower in alternative states, indicating decreased resources for detritivores, fungi, and ground-dwelling mammals. Aboveground carbon stocks were reduced by 59%, with a much higher proportion (98%) stored in small trees than reference states (20%). Lower fire tolerance of small trees suggests a greater vulnerability of carbon stocks to subsequent fires in alternative states compared to reference states. These findings highlight the long-term ecological consequences of altered fire regimes. In addition, emphasising the management and restoration of forest structural integrity is essential to maintain ecosystem functions in fire-prone landscapes that are increasingly vulnerable under changing climates.</p>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"32 5","pages":"e70895"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13140778/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70895","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increasingly frequent and intense wildfires threaten to push ecosystems beyond their ecological thresholds. Fire-adapted forests can be vulnerable to ecosystem conversion under shortening fire-return intervals. To evaluate the impacts of fire regime change, we contrasted Eucalyptus forests that retained canopy cover under tolerable regimes (reference forests) with alternative states of markedly reduced canopy. These alternative states established following short-interval wildfires and have persisted through subsequent fires. Alternative states were dominated by more uniform distributions of small trees (< 20 cm diameter) than reference states, with 97% fewer large trees (> 20 cm diameter). These changes in structure translated into declines in several key ecosystem functions. The loss of large, hollow-forming trees and limited Eucalyptus regeneration indicate long-term constraints on habitat availability for hollow-dependent fauna. Coarse woody debris mass was 38% lower in alternative states, indicating decreased resources for detritivores, fungi, and ground-dwelling mammals. Aboveground carbon stocks were reduced by 59%, with a much higher proportion (98%) stored in small trees than reference states (20%). Lower fire tolerance of small trees suggests a greater vulnerability of carbon stocks to subsequent fires in alternative states compared to reference states. These findings highlight the long-term ecological consequences of altered fire regimes. In addition, emphasising the management and restoration of forest structural integrity is essential to maintain ecosystem functions in fire-prone landscapes that are increasingly vulnerable under changing climates.

澳大利亚东南部温带森林生态系统组成、结构和功能的可选稳定状态
日益频繁和强烈的野火威胁着将生态系统推到其生态阈值之外。在还火间隔缩短的情况下,适应火的森林容易受到生态系统转换的影响。为了评估火灾状态变化的影响,我们对比了在可容忍状态(参考林)下保留冠层覆盖的桉树林和冠层明显减少的其他状态。这些替代状态在短时间间隔的野火之后建立,并在随后的火灾中持续存在。交替状态以小树(直径20 cm)分布较均匀为主。这些结构的变化导致了几个关键生态系统功能的下降。大型空心乔木的消失和桉树的有限更新表明,依赖空心的动物的栖息地可用性受到长期限制。在替代状态下,粗木屑质量降低了38%,表明腐食动物、真菌和陆生哺乳动物的资源减少。地上碳储量减少了59%,其中储存在小树中的比例(98%)远高于参考状态(20%)。小树较低的耐火性表明,与参考状态相比,备选状态下的碳储量更容易受到后续火灾的影响。这些发现强调了改变火灾制度的长期生态后果。此外,强调森林结构完整性的管理和恢复对于维持易发生火灾的景观的生态系统功能至关重要,这些景观在不断变化的气候下越来越脆弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology
Global Change Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
5.20%
发文量
497
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health. Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书