Study on Tensile-Shear Strength of Single Lap Joint Laminates with Defects

IF 2.9 4区 材料科学 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES
Jianjie Lin, Jiong Zhang, Lixiao Chen, Jiahe Ma, Qiang Xu
{"title":"Study on Tensile-Shear Strength of Single Lap Joint Laminates with Defects","authors":"Jianjie Lin,&nbsp;Jiong Zhang,&nbsp;Lixiao Chen,&nbsp;Jiahe Ma,&nbsp;Qiang Xu","doi":"10.1007/s10443-026-10476-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic (CFRP) has gained extensive application in aerospace engineering due to its exceptional specific strength, stiffness, and corrosion resistance. However, practical manufacturing processes often face limitations in mechanical precision and inaccuracies in the layup path. These deviations often manifest as fiber tow misalignments, such as gaps, overlapping defects, and mixed patterns. In this paper, these typical defects were examined as the research focus, and the debonding failure behavior at the interface between the structural skin and the stiffener was systematically studied. The influence of defects on the interlaminar shear strength was investigated through tensile-shear tests. Furthermore, the failure mechanisms of composite laminates containing defects were analyzed through numerical simulation. Experimental findings demonstrate that the 6-mm overlap causes a significant reduction in tensile-shear strength (18.13%), whereas the 6-mm gap substantially enhances tensile-shear strength (24.78%). For mixed defect configurations, the gap defect predominantly influences the macroscopic mechanical performance. It should be noted that the numerical model demonstrated a maximum error of 11.3% in predicting the failure load of the mixed defect group, though it captured the overall failure trends effectively. The specimens from the gap group and the mixed defect group did not fail completely under large displacement loads, demonstrating their secondary bearing capacity. A significant discrepancy exists between the model’s prediction and the experimental value for the secondary bearing capacity, identifying this as a key area for future model optimization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":468,"journal":{"name":"Applied Composite Materials","volume":"33 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Composite Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10443-026-10476-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic (CFRP) has gained extensive application in aerospace engineering due to its exceptional specific strength, stiffness, and corrosion resistance. However, practical manufacturing processes often face limitations in mechanical precision and inaccuracies in the layup path. These deviations often manifest as fiber tow misalignments, such as gaps, overlapping defects, and mixed patterns. In this paper, these typical defects were examined as the research focus, and the debonding failure behavior at the interface between the structural skin and the stiffener was systematically studied. The influence of defects on the interlaminar shear strength was investigated through tensile-shear tests. Furthermore, the failure mechanisms of composite laminates containing defects were analyzed through numerical simulation. Experimental findings demonstrate that the 6-mm overlap causes a significant reduction in tensile-shear strength (18.13%), whereas the 6-mm gap substantially enhances tensile-shear strength (24.78%). For mixed defect configurations, the gap defect predominantly influences the macroscopic mechanical performance. It should be noted that the numerical model demonstrated a maximum error of 11.3% in predicting the failure load of the mixed defect group, though it captured the overall failure trends effectively. The specimens from the gap group and the mixed defect group did not fail completely under large displacement loads, demonstrating their secondary bearing capacity. A significant discrepancy exists between the model’s prediction and the experimental value for the secondary bearing capacity, identifying this as a key area for future model optimization.

含缺陷单搭接层合板抗拉抗剪强度研究
碳纤维增强塑料(CFRP)由于其优异的比强度、刚度和耐腐蚀性,在航空航天工程中得到了广泛的应用。然而,实际的制造过程往往面临机械精度的限制和铺层路径的不准确性。这些偏差通常表现为纤维束错位,如间隙、重叠缺陷和混合模式。本文以这些典型缺陷为研究重点,系统地研究了结构蒙皮与加筋界面处的脱粘破坏行为。通过拉剪试验研究了缺陷对层间抗剪强度的影响。此外,通过数值模拟分析了含缺陷复合材料层合板的破坏机理。实验结果表明,6mm的重叠会显著降低抗拉剪切强度(18.13%),而6mm的重叠会显著提高抗拉剪切强度(24.78%)。对于混合缺陷构型,间隙缺陷主要影响宏观力学性能。值得注意的是,该数值模型在预测混合缺陷组的失效载荷时,虽然有效地捕捉了整体的失效趋势,但最大误差为11.3%。间隙组和混合缺陷组试件在大位移荷载作用下均未完全破坏,表明其具有二次承载能力。二次承载力模型预测值与试验值存在较大差异,这是未来模型优化的重点领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Composite Materials
Applied Composite Materials 工程技术-材料科学:复合
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Applied Composite Materials is an international journal dedicated to the publication of original full-length papers, review articles and short communications of the highest quality that advance the development and application of engineering composite materials. Its articles identify problems that limit the performance and reliability of the composite material and composite part; and propose solutions that lead to innovation in design and the successful exploitation and commercialization of composite materials across the widest spectrum of engineering uses. The main focus is on the quantitative descriptions of material systems and processing routes. Coverage includes management of time-dependent changes in microscopic and macroscopic structure and its exploitation from the material''s conception through to its eventual obsolescence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书