The long-term cardiovascular safety and efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in high-risk cardiovascular populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kezia Peter, Ocin Roka, Emma Sepp, Maya Warburton, Jufen Zhang, Simon C Cork
{"title":"The long-term cardiovascular safety and efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in high-risk cardiovascular populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Kezia Peter, Ocin Roka, Emma Sepp, Maya Warburton, Jufen Zhang, Simon C Cork","doi":"10.1186/s40842-026-00295-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are widely used for the management of type 2 diabetes and obesity, yet their long-term cardiovascular effects in high-risk populations continue to be actively evaluated. Given emerging evidence of both metabolic and direct cardiovascular actions, a comprehensive synthesis of cardiovascular outcome trial data is required to clarify the efficacy and safety of this drug class.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, placebo-controlled cardiovascular outcome trials evaluating GLP-1RAs in adults at high cardiovascular risk. Searches of PubMed, Embase (via OVID), and the Cochrane Library were performed for studies published between January 2015 and May 2025, in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Eligible trials included ≥ 3,000 participants with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, hospitalisation for heart failure, and adverse events. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven cardiovascular outcome trials comprising 91,490 participants were included, with a mean follow-up of 2.7 years. GLP-1RA treatment was associated with a significant reduction in MACE compared with placebo (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.81-0.92). Meta-analysis also demonstrated significant reductions in cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and hospitalisation for heart failure. GLP-1RAs did not materially increase the risk of severe hypoglycaemia or acute pancreatitis, while gastrointestinal adverse effects were consistently more frequent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GLP-1 receptor agonists significantly reduce major cardiovascular events and mortality in high-risk populations, with a favourable long-term safety profile. These findings support the broader integration of GLP-1RAs into cardiovascular risk reduction strategies beyond glycaemic control.</p>","PeriodicalId":521069,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular diabetology. Endocrinology reports","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13134098/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular diabetology. Endocrinology reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40842-026-00295-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are widely used for the management of type 2 diabetes and obesity, yet their long-term cardiovascular effects in high-risk populations continue to be actively evaluated. Given emerging evidence of both metabolic and direct cardiovascular actions, a comprehensive synthesis of cardiovascular outcome trial data is required to clarify the efficacy and safety of this drug class.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, placebo-controlled cardiovascular outcome trials evaluating GLP-1RAs in adults at high cardiovascular risk. Searches of PubMed, Embase (via OVID), and the Cochrane Library were performed for studies published between January 2015 and May 2025, in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Eligible trials included ≥ 3,000 participants with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, hospitalisation for heart failure, and adverse events. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE.
Results: Eleven cardiovascular outcome trials comprising 91,490 participants were included, with a mean follow-up of 2.7 years. GLP-1RA treatment was associated with a significant reduction in MACE compared with placebo (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.81-0.92). Meta-analysis also demonstrated significant reductions in cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and hospitalisation for heart failure. GLP-1RAs did not materially increase the risk of severe hypoglycaemia or acute pancreatitis, while gastrointestinal adverse effects were consistently more frequent.
Conclusions: GLP-1 receptor agonists significantly reduce major cardiovascular events and mortality in high-risk populations, with a favourable long-term safety profile. These findings support the broader integration of GLP-1RAs into cardiovascular risk reduction strategies beyond glycaemic control.
背景:胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)广泛用于2型糖尿病和肥胖的治疗,但其在高危人群中的长期心血管效应仍在积极评估中。鉴于代谢和直接心血管作用的新证据,需要对心血管结局试验数据进行全面综合,以阐明这类药物的有效性和安全性。方法:我们对随机、安慰剂对照的心血管结局试验进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,评估了成人高危心血管患者的GLP-1RAs。根据PRISMA 2020指南,检索PubMed、Embase(通过OVID)和Cochrane图书馆,检索2015年1月至2025年5月间发表的研究。符合条件的试验包括≥3000名受试者,至少随访12个月。主要终点为主要不良心血管事件(MACE)。次要结局包括心血管死亡率、全因死亡率、非致死性心肌梗死、非致死性中风、心力衰竭住院和不良事件。采用随机效应荟萃分析合并风险比(hr)和95%置信区间(ci)。使用Cochrane RoB 2工具评估偏倚风险,使用GRADE评估证据的确定性。结果:11项心血管结局试验纳入91490名参与者,平均随访2.7年。与安慰剂相比,GLP-1RA治疗与MACE显著降低相关(HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.81-0.92)。荟萃分析还显示心血管死亡率、全因死亡率、非致死性心肌梗死、非致死性中风和心力衰竭住院率显著降低。GLP-1RAs并未显著增加严重低血糖或急性胰腺炎的风险,但胃肠道不良反应却更为频繁。结论:GLP-1受体激动剂可显著降低高危人群的主要心血管事件和死亡率,并具有良好的长期安全性。这些发现支持将GLP-1RAs广泛整合到血糖控制之外的心血管风险降低策略中。