Comparative outcomes for treatment of type 1 retinopathy of prematurity in a contemporary cohort.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Anne Strong Caldwell, Jennifer Patnaik, Lauren Mehner, Emily McCourt, Anne Lynch, Emily Auer, Marc Mathias, Scott Oliver, Jennifer Jung
{"title":"Comparative outcomes for treatment of type 1 retinopathy of prematurity in a contemporary cohort.","authors":"Anne Strong Caldwell, Jennifer Patnaik, Lauren Mehner, Emily McCourt, Anne Lynch, Emily Auer, Marc Mathias, Scott Oliver, Jennifer Jung","doi":"10.1016/j.jaapos.2026.104847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current mainstays of treatment for type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) are laser therapy and anti-VEGF intravitreal injections (IVI) or a combination of the two. Data comparing treatment outcomes between these modalities are heterogenous and limited by short-term follow-up. There is limited data on visual acuity after treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate visual acuity, structural outcomes, and refractive error (RE) between primary laser and primary IVI in a contemporary cohort treated for ROP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of patients treated for type 1 ROP at a tertiary care center from 2006 to 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Demographics, treatment, visual acuity, adverse outcomes, and RE were analyzed between primary IVI and primary laser treatment groups. Adverse outcomes that were analyzed were strabismus, macular dragging, optic atrophy, retinal detachment, and amblyopia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 179 patients (358 eyes) received treatment for type 1 ROP. Most patients received primary laser therapy (83.5%). We were able to collect formal visual acuity testing on 92 eyes. Most had vision of 20/40 or better (60%), and all patients had vision better than 20/200 in at least one eye. There was no difference in adverse ocular outcomes or RE between the primary laser and primary IVI groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In contrast to prior studies, there were no differences in adverse ocular outcomes between primary IVI and primary laser for ROP. Our study demonstrates high effectiveness of both anti-VEGF and ROP laser, with low rates of retinal detachment and blindness.</p>","PeriodicalId":50261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aapos","volume":" ","pages":"104847"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aapos","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2026.104847","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The current mainstays of treatment for type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) are laser therapy and anti-VEGF intravitreal injections (IVI) or a combination of the two. Data comparing treatment outcomes between these modalities are heterogenous and limited by short-term follow-up. There is limited data on visual acuity after treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate visual acuity, structural outcomes, and refractive error (RE) between primary laser and primary IVI in a contemporary cohort treated for ROP.

Methods: The medical records of patients treated for type 1 ROP at a tertiary care center from 2006 to 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Demographics, treatment, visual acuity, adverse outcomes, and RE were analyzed between primary IVI and primary laser treatment groups. Adverse outcomes that were analyzed were strabismus, macular dragging, optic atrophy, retinal detachment, and amblyopia.

Results: A total of 179 patients (358 eyes) received treatment for type 1 ROP. Most patients received primary laser therapy (83.5%). We were able to collect formal visual acuity testing on 92 eyes. Most had vision of 20/40 or better (60%), and all patients had vision better than 20/200 in at least one eye. There was no difference in adverse ocular outcomes or RE between the primary laser and primary IVI groups.

Conclusions: In contrast to prior studies, there were no differences in adverse ocular outcomes between primary IVI and primary laser for ROP. Our study demonstrates high effectiveness of both anti-VEGF and ROP laser, with low rates of retinal detachment and blindness.

当代队列早产儿1型视网膜病变治疗的比较结果
背景:目前治疗1型早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)的主要方法是激光治疗和抗vegf玻璃体内注射(IVI)或两者结合。比较这些治疗方式的治疗结果的数据是不同的,并且受到短期随访的限制。治疗后的视力数据有限。本研究的目的是调查原发性激光和原发性IVI治疗的ROP患者的视力、结构结果和屈光不正(RE)。方法:回顾性分析2006 ~ 2022年某三级保健中心收治的1型ROP患者的病历。对初次IVI组和初次激光治疗组的人口统计学、治疗、视力、不良结局和RE进行分析。分析的不良结果包括斜视、黄斑拖、视神经萎缩、视网膜脱离和弱视。结果:179例(358眼)患者接受1型ROP治疗。大多数患者接受了初级激光治疗(83.5%)。我们收集了92只眼睛的正式视力测试结果。大多数患者的视力在20/40或更好(60%),所有患者至少有一只眼睛的视力在20/200以上。原发性激光组和原发性IVI组在眼部不良结局或RE方面没有差异。结论:与先前的研究相比,原发性IVI和原发性激光治疗ROP的不良预后没有差异。我们的研究表明,抗vegf和ROP激光都有很高的疗效,视网膜脱离和失明的发生率很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Aapos
Journal of Aapos 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
159
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Journal of AAPOS presents expert information on children''s eye diseases and on strabismus as it affects all age groups. Major articles by leading experts in the field cover clinical and investigative studies, treatments, case reports, surgical techniques, descriptions of instrumentation, current concept reviews, and new diagnostic techniques. The Journal is the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书