Dry needling directly into trigger points is associated with improved gait parameters: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.9 Q2 REHABILITATION
Stephanie R Albin, Larisa R Hoffman, Cameron W MacDonald, Andrew Bates, Ann Brewer, Alexandra Gordon, Justin Hua, David Shaw, Shane L Koppenhaver, Jeffrey Hebert
{"title":"Dry needling directly into trigger points is associated with improved gait parameters: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Stephanie R Albin, Larisa R Hoffman, Cameron W MacDonald, Andrew Bates, Ann Brewer, Alexandra Gordon, Justin Hua, David Shaw, Shane L Koppenhaver, Jeffrey Hebert","doi":"10.1080/10669817.2026.2666327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although used in individuals after ankle or hindfoot injury, little is known about the effects of dry needling (DN) on gait parameters or whether the effect depends upon location of the needle. Therefore, our aim was to compare the effect of DN into a myofascial trigger point (MTrP) versus needling within the same muscle on gait velocity, step length, and peak pressure during gait phases after injury to the ankle/hindfoot.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-three individuals with injury to the ankle/hindfoot were randomized to receive DN directly to MTrPs (DNMTrP) or DN into the same muscle but 2.0 cm away from the MTrP (Control). Individuals received three DN sessions 1 week apart and were assessed prior to and immediately after each DNsession and 2 weeks later. Spatiotemporal characteristics of gait were assessed using the GAITRite system and peak pressure and force were assessed using the EMED platform using linear mixed models. .</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjusting for baseline differences, normalized gait velocity and step length were significantly higher for the DNMTrP group than the control group at the second session and subsequent assessments [adjusted 4-week difference = 0.10 (0.03, 0.18) m/s and 4.88 (1.69, 8.07) cm, respectively]. After adjusting for baseline differences, peak pressure at weight acceptance was also significantly higher in the DNMTrP group than the control group at the second session and subsequent assessments [adjusted 4-week difference = 77.50 (36.60, 118.39) kPa].</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>DN directly to MTrPs appears to increase gait velocity, step length and peak pressures at weight acceptance and changes lasted for 2 weeks following the intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":47319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2026.2666327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Although used in individuals after ankle or hindfoot injury, little is known about the effects of dry needling (DN) on gait parameters or whether the effect depends upon location of the needle. Therefore, our aim was to compare the effect of DN into a myofascial trigger point (MTrP) versus needling within the same muscle on gait velocity, step length, and peak pressure during gait phases after injury to the ankle/hindfoot.

Methods: Thirty-three individuals with injury to the ankle/hindfoot were randomized to receive DN directly to MTrPs (DNMTrP) or DN into the same muscle but 2.0 cm away from the MTrP (Control). Individuals received three DN sessions 1 week apart and were assessed prior to and immediately after each DNsession and 2 weeks later. Spatiotemporal characteristics of gait were assessed using the GAITRite system and peak pressure and force were assessed using the EMED platform using linear mixed models. .

Results: After adjusting for baseline differences, normalized gait velocity and step length were significantly higher for the DNMTrP group than the control group at the second session and subsequent assessments [adjusted 4-week difference = 0.10 (0.03, 0.18) m/s and 4.88 (1.69, 8.07) cm, respectively]. After adjusting for baseline differences, peak pressure at weight acceptance was also significantly higher in the DNMTrP group than the control group at the second session and subsequent assessments [adjusted 4-week difference = 77.50 (36.60, 118.39) kPa].

Discussion/conclusion: DN directly to MTrPs appears to increase gait velocity, step length and peak pressures at weight acceptance and changes lasted for 2 weeks following the intervention.

直接干针刺触发点与改善步态参数相关:一项随机对照试验。
目的:虽然用于踝关节或后足损伤后的个体,但关于干针(DN)对步态参数的影响或影响是否取决于针的位置,我们所知甚少。因此,我们的目的是比较DN进入肌筋膜触发点(MTrP)与在同一肌肉内针刺对脚踝/后脚受伤后步态阶段的步态速度、步长和峰值压力的影响。方法:将33例踝关节/后足损伤患者随机分为两组,一组接受DN直接植入MTrP (DNMTrP),另一组接受DN植入同一肌肉但距离MTrP 2.0 cm(对照组)。受试者每隔一周接受三次DN治疗,分别在每次DN治疗前后和两周后进行评估。采用GAITRite系统评估步态的时空特征,采用线性混合模型的EMED平台评估峰值压力和力。结果:在调整基线差异后,DNMTrP组在第二次和随后的评估中标准化的步态速度和步长明显高于对照组[调整后的4周差异分别= 0.10 (0.03,0.18)m/s和4.88 (1.69,8.07)cm]。在调整基线差异后,DNMTrP组在第二次和随后的评估中接受体重时的峰值压力也明显高于对照组[调整后的4周差异= 77.50 (36.60,118.39)kPa]。讨论/结论:DN直接作用于MTrPs似乎增加了步态速度、步长和体重接受时的峰值压力,这种变化在干预后持续了2周。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research, case reports, and reviews of the literature that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of manual therapy, clinical research, therapeutic practice, and academic training. In addition, each issue features an editorial written by the editor or a guest editor, media reviews, thesis reviews, and abstracts of current literature. Areas of interest include: •Thrust and non-thrust manipulation •Neurodynamic assessment and treatment •Diagnostic accuracy and classification •Manual therapy-related interventions •Clinical decision-making processes •Understanding clinimetrics for the clinician
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书