The Formula of Humanity and AI Use.

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Philosophy and Technology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-01 DOI:10.1007/s13347-026-01100-w
Martin Sticker
{"title":"The Formula of Humanity and AI Use.","authors":"Martin Sticker","doi":"10.1007/s13347-026-01100-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aylsworth and Castro have argued that, following Kant's Formula of Humanity, using ChatGPT to write humanities essays constitutes a violation of a duty to cultivate one's humanity. I first turn to a critical evaluation of their argument and then point to a further dimension in which the FH has a bearing on the ethics of AI use. My positive contribution is to propose that Kant's Formula of Humanity can contribute to the ethics of LLM use when we focus on the prohibition against treating <i>others</i> as mere means. Kant's practical philosophy is in an excellent position to capture both the danger of treating others as mere means and to account for the value of being a means. AI may endanger both: the status of some workers as ends rather than mere means and the ability of workers to function as ends on their own terms.</p>","PeriodicalId":39065,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Technology","volume":"39 2","pages":"90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13134972/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-026-01100-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aylsworth and Castro have argued that, following Kant's Formula of Humanity, using ChatGPT to write humanities essays constitutes a violation of a duty to cultivate one's humanity. I first turn to a critical evaluation of their argument and then point to a further dimension in which the FH has a bearing on the ethics of AI use. My positive contribution is to propose that Kant's Formula of Humanity can contribute to the ethics of LLM use when we focus on the prohibition against treating others as mere means. Kant's practical philosophy is in an excellent position to capture both the danger of treating others as mere means and to account for the value of being a means. AI may endanger both: the status of some workers as ends rather than mere means and the ability of workers to function as ends on their own terms.

人性的公式和人工智能的使用。
艾尔斯沃斯和卡斯特罗认为,按照康德的人性公式,使用ChatGPT写人文论文违反了培养人性的义务。我首先对他们的论点进行了批判性的评估,然后指出了FH与人工智能使用伦理的进一步维度。我的积极贡献是提出,当我们专注于禁止将他人仅仅视为手段时,康德的人性公式可以对法学硕士使用的伦理做出贡献。康德的实践哲学很好地抓住了将他人仅仅视为手段的危险,并解释了作为手段的价值。人工智能可能会危及两者:一些工人作为目的而不仅仅是手段的地位,以及工人按照自己的方式作为目的发挥作用的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Philosophy and Technology
Philosophy and Technology Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
98
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书