Addressing forgotten double J stents: Lessons learned from a tertiary care center.

IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Devashish Kaushal, Viswas Raghavendra Marathi, Kumar Madhavan, Amrut Phonde, Shushant Shandilya
{"title":"Addressing forgotten double J stents: Lessons learned from a tertiary care center.","authors":"Devashish Kaushal, Viswas Raghavendra Marathi, Kumar Madhavan, Amrut Phonde, Shushant Shandilya","doi":"10.1177/03915603261447148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Double-J (DJ) stents find extensive use in Endourology. Nevertheless, occurrence of forgotten stents is not uncommon. This retrospective study details our encounters in handling forgotten stents and outlines the measures we have implemented to mitigate morbidity associated with DJ stents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of hospital records of cases with Forgotten DJ stents from Jan 2021 to Jan 2025. The details reviewed included age, sex, indication for stenting, duration of the indwelling stent, presenting complaints, management, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total of 35 patients, the mean patient age was 46.8 years (14-70 years). The male-to-female ratio was 4:3 (20 males and 15 females). The mean indwelling time was 35.8 months. Flank pain was the commonest symptom (72.7%), followed by storage lower urinary tract symptoms (54.5%) and dysuria (50%). Complicated stents were noted in 17 patients (48.5%), whereas uncomplicated stents were noted in 18 patients (51.5%). All 18 \"uncomplicated\" stents could be removed cystoscopically, while complicated stents were removed by the combination of endourological techniques mainly, while two patients underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy in which one of them needed open cystolithotomy also.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The issue of forgotten DJ stents remains a prevalent problem in developing countries, causing significant morbidity and financial burdens for patients. Stent registers and electronic stent extraction reminders helps us to minimize the incidence of forgotten stents.</p>","PeriodicalId":23574,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Journal","volume":" ","pages":"3915603261447148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603261447148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Double-J (DJ) stents find extensive use in Endourology. Nevertheless, occurrence of forgotten stents is not uncommon. This retrospective study details our encounters in handling forgotten stents and outlines the measures we have implemented to mitigate morbidity associated with DJ stents.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of hospital records of cases with Forgotten DJ stents from Jan 2021 to Jan 2025. The details reviewed included age, sex, indication for stenting, duration of the indwelling stent, presenting complaints, management, and complications.

Results: Of the total of 35 patients, the mean patient age was 46.8 years (14-70 years). The male-to-female ratio was 4:3 (20 males and 15 females). The mean indwelling time was 35.8 months. Flank pain was the commonest symptom (72.7%), followed by storage lower urinary tract symptoms (54.5%) and dysuria (50%). Complicated stents were noted in 17 patients (48.5%), whereas uncomplicated stents were noted in 18 patients (51.5%). All 18 "uncomplicated" stents could be removed cystoscopically, while complicated stents were removed by the combination of endourological techniques mainly, while two patients underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy in which one of them needed open cystolithotomy also.

Conclusion: The issue of forgotten DJ stents remains a prevalent problem in developing countries, causing significant morbidity and financial burdens for patients. Stent registers and electronic stent extraction reminders helps us to minimize the incidence of forgotten stents.

解决被遗忘的双J型:从三级保健中心吸取的经验教训。
导读:双j (DJ)支架广泛应用于泌尿道内科。然而,遗忘支架的发生并不罕见。这项回顾性研究详细介绍了我们在处理遗忘支架时遇到的情况,并概述了我们为减轻与DJ支架相关的发病率而实施的措施。方法:回顾性分析2021年1月至2025年1月住院记录的遗忘DJ支架病例。回顾的细节包括年龄、性别、支架的适应症、支架留置时间、主诉、处理和并发症。结果:35例患者中,平均年龄为46.8岁(14 ~ 70岁)。男女比例为4:3(男20,女15)。平均留置时间35.8个月。腹部疼痛是最常见的症状(72.7%),其次是下尿路积液症状(54.5%)和排尿困难(50%)。合并支架17例(48.5%),合并无并发症支架18例(51.5%)。18例“不复杂”的肾内支架均可经膀胱镜取出,复杂的肾内支架以联合泌尿系统技术取出为主,2例患者行腹腔镜肾切除术,其中1例还需开腹取石。结论:遗忘的DJ支架问题在发展中国家仍然是一个普遍的问题,给患者造成了严重的发病率和经济负担。支架登记和电子支架取出提醒帮助我们将遗忘支架的发生率降到最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urologia Journal
Urologia Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书