Mario de Angelis, Pietro Scilipoti, Riccardo Leni, Mattia Longoni, Paolo Zaurito, Antonio Franco, Edoardo Beatrici, Stefano Resca, Andrea Noya Mourullo, Enrico Vecchio, Sara Tamburini, Claudio Brancelli, Vincenzo Cavarra, Alfonso Santangelo, Andrea Folcia, Armando Galdieri, Giorgio Gandaglia, Armando Stabile, Ettore Di Trapani, Gennaro Musi, Ruben De Groote, Alexandre Mottrie, Francesco Montorsi, Alberto Briganti, Marco Bandini
{"title":"Clinical and surgical management of recto-urinary fistula after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review on current evidence.","authors":"Mario de Angelis, Pietro Scilipoti, Riccardo Leni, Mattia Longoni, Paolo Zaurito, Antonio Franco, Edoardo Beatrici, Stefano Resca, Andrea Noya Mourullo, Enrico Vecchio, Sara Tamburini, Claudio Brancelli, Vincenzo Cavarra, Alfonso Santangelo, Andrea Folcia, Armando Galdieri, Giorgio Gandaglia, Armando Stabile, Ettore Di Trapani, Gennaro Musi, Ruben De Groote, Alexandre Mottrie, Francesco Montorsi, Alberto Briganti, Marco Bandini","doi":"10.1038/s41391-026-01114-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Management of rectourinary fistula (RUF) is challenging due to limited data and variability in presentation and treatment. We conducted a systematic review of radical prostatectomy (RP)-related RUF to assess clinical features, diagnostics, treatments, and outcomes, and to propose a structured algorithm to guide management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the clinical presentation, diagnostic strategies, management approaches, and outcomes of RUF following RP. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was performed from database inception to January 2025. Data were extracted on patient demographics, symptoms, diagnostic modalities, management strategies, surgical repair techniques and treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 455 cases of RUF following RP were identified across 34 studies. The reported incidence of RUF ranged from <0.01% to 1.5%. The most frequent presenting symptoms were urine leakage per rectum (60.7%), fecaluria (44.1%), and pneumaturia (50.0%). Fecal and/or urinary diversion was utilized in over 60% of cases, with a median stoma duration of 3 months and an indwelling urinary catheter duration of 1 month. Conservative management (observation, fluid replacement and antibiotic therapy) was attempted in a minority of patients and was generally associated with success rates below 50%. Surgical repair was performed in nearly all cases, with the transperineal and transsphincteric approaches being the most commonly employed techniques. The median time to fistula closure ranged from 0.5 to 30 months, with reported surgical success rates varying between 41% and 100%. We propose a management flowchart based on our clinical experience, outlining the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to rectal injury and RP-related RUF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RUF after RP remains a challenging complication, often requiring stepwise management. Conservative treatments rarely succeed, and surgery is often necessary. Our proposed algorithm aims to standardize the approach to RI and RUF, guiding treatment decisions and improving outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20727,"journal":{"name":"Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-026-01114-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Management of rectourinary fistula (RUF) is challenging due to limited data and variability in presentation and treatment. We conducted a systematic review of radical prostatectomy (RP)-related RUF to assess clinical features, diagnostics, treatments, and outcomes, and to propose a structured algorithm to guide management.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the clinical presentation, diagnostic strategies, management approaches, and outcomes of RUF following RP. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was performed from database inception to January 2025. Data were extracted on patient demographics, symptoms, diagnostic modalities, management strategies, surgical repair techniques and treatment outcomes.
Results: A total of 455 cases of RUF following RP were identified across 34 studies. The reported incidence of RUF ranged from <0.01% to 1.5%. The most frequent presenting symptoms were urine leakage per rectum (60.7%), fecaluria (44.1%), and pneumaturia (50.0%). Fecal and/or urinary diversion was utilized in over 60% of cases, with a median stoma duration of 3 months and an indwelling urinary catheter duration of 1 month. Conservative management (observation, fluid replacement and antibiotic therapy) was attempted in a minority of patients and was generally associated with success rates below 50%. Surgical repair was performed in nearly all cases, with the transperineal and transsphincteric approaches being the most commonly employed techniques. The median time to fistula closure ranged from 0.5 to 30 months, with reported surgical success rates varying between 41% and 100%. We propose a management flowchart based on our clinical experience, outlining the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to rectal injury and RP-related RUF.
Conclusions: RUF after RP remains a challenging complication, often requiring stepwise management. Conservative treatments rarely succeed, and surgery is often necessary. Our proposed algorithm aims to standardize the approach to RI and RUF, guiding treatment decisions and improving outcomes.
背景:直肠瘘(RUF)的管理是具有挑战性的,由于有限的数据和变异性的表现和治疗。我们对根治性前列腺切除术(RP)相关的RUF进行了系统回顾,以评估临床特征、诊断、治疗和结果,并提出了一个结构化的算法来指导管理。方法:我们根据PRISMA指南进行了系统的综述,以评估RP后RUF的临床表现、诊断策略、管理方法和结局。从数据库建立到2025年1月,对PubMed、Embase和Web of Science进行了全面的检索。提取患者人口统计学、症状、诊断方式、管理策略、手术修复技术和治疗结果的数据。结果:34项研究共发现455例RP后RUF。结论:RP后RUF仍然是一个具有挑战性的并发症,通常需要逐步治疗。保守治疗很少成功,手术往往是必要的。我们提出的算法旨在标准化RI和RUF的方法,指导治疗决策并改善结果。
期刊介绍:
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases covers all aspects of prostatic diseases, in particular prostate cancer, the subject of intensive basic and clinical research world-wide. The journal also reports on exciting new developments being made in diagnosis, surgery, radiotherapy, drug discovery and medical management.
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases is of interest to surgeons, oncologists and clinicians treating patients and to those involved in research into diseases of the prostate. The journal covers the three main areas - prostate cancer, male LUTS and prostatitis.
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases publishes original research articles, reviews, topical comment and critical appraisals of scientific meetings and the latest books. The journal also contains a calendar of forthcoming scientific meetings. The Editors and a distinguished Editorial Board ensure that submitted articles receive fast and efficient attention and are refereed to the highest possible scientific standard. A fast track system is available for topical articles of particular significance.