Platelet lysate versus hyaluronic acid after arthrocentesis in the treatment of temporomandibular joint anterior disc displacement with reduction: a randomized clinical trial.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Heba Abo-Elfetouh Elsheikh, Fakhreldin Hassan Abdel-Rahman, Nada Khaled, Sally Elsayed Abdelsameaa
{"title":"Platelet lysate versus hyaluronic acid after arthrocentesis in the treatment of temporomandibular joint anterior disc displacement with reduction: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Heba Abo-Elfetouh Elsheikh, Fakhreldin Hassan Abdel-Rahman, Nada Khaled, Sally Elsayed Abdelsameaa","doi":"10.1007/s10266-026-01397-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy of Platelet Lysate (PL) versus Hyaluronic Acid (HA) after arthrocentesis in the management of patients with anterior disc displacement with reduction. This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 60 patients (17 males and 43 females) with anterior disc displacement with reduction confirmed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The patients were split into two equal groups at random based on the type of treatment that was used. Group 1: arthrocentesis plus PL, Group 2 arthrocentesis plus HA. The pain intensity, clicking sound, maximum inter-incisal opening (MIO) and range of lateral mandibular excursions were measured. All the measured parameters were statistically analyzed. After 6 months, both groups demonstrated a significant improvement in all the parameters that were measured. The PL Group showed a statistically better resolution of clicking compared to HA Group with an Absolute Risk Difference of 33.3% (P < 0.05). The MIO between-group difference was 4.867 mm (P < 0.001), so exceeding the Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID). On the other hand, although the PL Group demonstrated statistical superiority in pain scores and range of lateral mandibular excursions (P < 0.05), the clinical magnitude of the between-group difference was modest. PL appears to be a safe and effective adjunctive intra-articular therapy after arthrocentesis for the management of patients with anterior disc displacement with reduction. It provides a clinical advantage over HA in resolving joint clicking and improving MIO. For pain reduction and range of lateral mandibular excursions, the therapeutic benefits of PL and HA are clinically comparable. Trial registration: On 4/12/2024, it was registered in Clinical-Trials.gov PRS ( https://register.clinicaltrials.gov ) with identification number NCT06441279.</p>","PeriodicalId":19390,"journal":{"name":"Odontology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Odontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-026-01397-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy of Platelet Lysate (PL) versus Hyaluronic Acid (HA) after arthrocentesis in the management of patients with anterior disc displacement with reduction. This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 60 patients (17 males and 43 females) with anterior disc displacement with reduction confirmed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The patients were split into two equal groups at random based on the type of treatment that was used. Group 1: arthrocentesis plus PL, Group 2 arthrocentesis plus HA. The pain intensity, clicking sound, maximum inter-incisal opening (MIO) and range of lateral mandibular excursions were measured. All the measured parameters were statistically analyzed. After 6 months, both groups demonstrated a significant improvement in all the parameters that were measured. The PL Group showed a statistically better resolution of clicking compared to HA Group with an Absolute Risk Difference of 33.3% (P < 0.05). The MIO between-group difference was 4.867 mm (P < 0.001), so exceeding the Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID). On the other hand, although the PL Group demonstrated statistical superiority in pain scores and range of lateral mandibular excursions (P < 0.05), the clinical magnitude of the between-group difference was modest. PL appears to be a safe and effective adjunctive intra-articular therapy after arthrocentesis for the management of patients with anterior disc displacement with reduction. It provides a clinical advantage over HA in resolving joint clicking and improving MIO. For pain reduction and range of lateral mandibular excursions, the therapeutic benefits of PL and HA are clinically comparable. Trial registration: On 4/12/2024, it was registered in Clinical-Trials.gov PRS ( https://register.clinicaltrials.gov ) with identification number NCT06441279.

血小板裂解液与透明质酸在关节穿刺后治疗颞下颌关节前盘移位复位:一项随机临床试验。
该研究的目的是比较血小板裂解液(PL)与透明质酸(HA)在关节置换术后治疗前椎间盘移位伴复位患者的临床疗效。这项随机临床试验对60例经磁共振成像(MRI)证实为前椎间盘移位并复位的患者(男性17例,女性43例)进行了研究。根据所采用的治疗方式,患者被随机分为两组。第一组:关节穿刺+ PL,第二组:关节穿刺+ HA。测量疼痛强度、咔嗒声、最大切间开口(MIO)和下颌外侧偏移范围。对所有测量参数进行统计分析。6个月后,两组测量的所有参数都有显著改善。与HA组相比,PL组显示出统计学上更好的点击分辨率,绝对风险差异为33.3% (P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Odontology
Odontology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal Odontology covers all disciplines involved in the fields of dentistry and craniofacial research, including molecular studies related to oral health and disease. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics ranging from research on human dental pulp, to comparisons of analgesics in surgery, to analysis of biofilm properties of dental plaque.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书