Non-Cement-Based Soil Stabilization Material: A Review of Biochar, Nanocellulose, and Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Powder Composite for Sustainable Geotechnics.

IF 3.2 3区 材料科学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Materials Pub Date : 2026-04-15 DOI:10.3390/ma19081598
Darlington Hyginus Nwaiwu, Dagan Lin, Xiao Wei, Fushen Liu
{"title":"Non-Cement-Based Soil Stabilization Material: A Review of Biochar, Nanocellulose, and Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Powder Composite for Sustainable Geotechnics.","authors":"Darlington Hyginus Nwaiwu, Dagan Lin, Xiao Wei, Fushen Liu","doi":"10.3390/ma19081598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Soil stabilizers using conventional cement and lime binders incur high environmental costs owing to CO<sub>2</sub> emissions associated with their excavation, production, and processing. This has motivated research on low-carbon, waste-derived alternatives. The review shows that: biochar increases unconfined compressive strength (UCS) by 15-40% with a 2-5% dosage through pore filling and particle binding; nanocellulose promotes soil cohesion by 25-60% through fibrous network development and tensile bridging; recycled PET powder at 5-10% increases shear strength by 20-35% promoting mechanical interlocking, increasing stiffness, crack resistance and durability. Biochar provides direct carbon sequestration with a carbon transfer capacity of up to 2.5 tons CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/ton. Recycled PET introduces waste valorization, with the potential to divert millions of tons of annual PET waste, while nanocellulose provides indirect carbon savings by avoiding emissions from cement and lime replacement. This review's objectives are as follows: providing a comprehensive comparison of biochar, nanocellulose, and PET powder as promising non-cement composite stabilizers; identifying optimal dosage ranges and stabilization mechanisms for each material across different soil types; and outlining knowledge gaps and future research directions in sustainable geotechnical practices. The review assessed the individual and synergistic effects of the additives on critical geotechnical properties, including unconfined compressive strength (UCS), California bearing ratio (CBR), resilient resistance, swelling resistance, and the durability of the treated soil. Findings provide actionable guidance for practitioners seeking to reduce construction carbon footprints while maintaining geotechnical performance standards. Research gaps were identified, and future directions for integrating high-performance, low-carbon soil composites into sustainable construction solutions are proposed.</p>","PeriodicalId":18281,"journal":{"name":"Materials","volume":"19 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13117356/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19081598","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil stabilizers using conventional cement and lime binders incur high environmental costs owing to CO2 emissions associated with their excavation, production, and processing. This has motivated research on low-carbon, waste-derived alternatives. The review shows that: biochar increases unconfined compressive strength (UCS) by 15-40% with a 2-5% dosage through pore filling and particle binding; nanocellulose promotes soil cohesion by 25-60% through fibrous network development and tensile bridging; recycled PET powder at 5-10% increases shear strength by 20-35% promoting mechanical interlocking, increasing stiffness, crack resistance and durability. Biochar provides direct carbon sequestration with a carbon transfer capacity of up to 2.5 tons CO2-eq/ton. Recycled PET introduces waste valorization, with the potential to divert millions of tons of annual PET waste, while nanocellulose provides indirect carbon savings by avoiding emissions from cement and lime replacement. This review's objectives are as follows: providing a comprehensive comparison of biochar, nanocellulose, and PET powder as promising non-cement composite stabilizers; identifying optimal dosage ranges and stabilization mechanisms for each material across different soil types; and outlining knowledge gaps and future research directions in sustainable geotechnical practices. The review assessed the individual and synergistic effects of the additives on critical geotechnical properties, including unconfined compressive strength (UCS), California bearing ratio (CBR), resilient resistance, swelling resistance, and the durability of the treated soil. Findings provide actionable guidance for practitioners seeking to reduce construction carbon footprints while maintaining geotechnical performance standards. Research gaps were identified, and future directions for integrating high-performance, low-carbon soil composites into sustainable construction solutions are proposed.

非水泥基土壤稳定材料:生物炭、纳米纤维素和再生聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(PET)粉末复合材料在可持续岩土工程中的研究进展。
使用传统水泥和石灰粘结剂的土壤稳定剂由于其挖掘、生产和加工过程中产生的二氧化碳排放而产生高昂的环境成本。这激发了对低碳、废物衍生替代品的研究。研究表明:生物炭通过孔隙填充和颗粒结合作用,在2 ~ 5%的添加量下,可使无侧限抗压强度提高15 ~ 40%;纳米纤维素通过纤维网络发育和拉伸桥接促进土壤黏结力提高25-60%;5-10%的再生PET粉可使抗剪强度提高20-35%,促进机械联锁,提高刚度、抗裂性和耐久性。生物炭提供直接的碳固存,其碳转移能力高达每吨2.5吨二氧化碳当量。再生PET引入了废物增值,每年有可能转移数百万吨PET废物,而纳米纤维素通过避免水泥和石灰替代的排放而间接节省了碳。本综述的目的如下:全面比较生物炭、纳米纤维素和PET粉末作为有前途的非水泥复合稳定剂;确定每种材料在不同土壤类型中的最佳剂量范围和稳定机制;并概述了可持续岩土工程实践的知识差距和未来的研究方向。该综述评估了添加剂对关键岩土性能的单独和协同效应,包括无侧限抗压强度(UCS)、加州承载比(CBR)、回弹性、抗膨胀性和处理后土壤的耐久性。研究结果为寻求在保持岩土性能标准的同时减少建筑碳足迹的从业人员提供了可操作的指导。指出了研究空白,并提出了将高性能低碳土壤复合材料整合到可持续建筑解决方案中的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Materials
Materials MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
7753
审稿时长
1.2 months
期刊介绍: Materials (ISSN 1996-1944) is an open access journal of related scientific research and technology development. It publishes reviews, regular research papers (articles) and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Materials provides a forum for publishing papers which advance the in-depth understanding of the relationship between the structure, the properties or the functions of all kinds of materials. Chemical syntheses, chemical structures and mechanical, chemical, electronic, magnetic and optical properties and various applications will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书