Clinician decision-making for transitioning to single-use negative pressure wound therapy: analysis of real-world practice in an acute setting.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Journal of wound care Pub Date : 2026-05-02 Epub Date: 2026-04-30 DOI:10.12968/jowc.2025.0579
Connie Johnson, Mandy Spitzer, Sophie Berry, Jonathan Minton
{"title":"Clinician decision-making for transitioning to single-use negative pressure wound therapy: analysis of real-world practice in an acute setting.","authors":"Connie Johnson, Mandy Spitzer, Sophie Berry, Jonathan Minton","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2025.0579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite the widespread adoption of traditional negative pressure wound therapy (tNPWT) to improve clinical outcomes for hard-to-heal (chronic) wounds and the increasing availability of single-use systems that improve patient acceptability, there is limited evidence published about when to use each type of system to optimise treatment pathways. The aim of this retrospective case review was to evaluate those wounds transitioned from tNPWT to single-use NPWT (sNPWT) in a real-world, acute care setting and review clinical outcomes, thereby informing future practice approaches.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective chart review of the treatment pathway and clinical outcomes of all patients with wounds managed using NPWT presenting at a single, acute care hospital in the US from February 2023 to September 2024 was conducted. Initial tNPWT was administered continually at either -80mmHg or -120mmHg for all wounds. Wound characteristics and healing outcomes for patients transitioned from tNPWT to sNPWT during the course of treatment were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Electronic medical records of 27 patients (12 females, 15 males; with 70% aged 36-75 years) with wounds that were eligible for treatment with NPWT were available for review. Mean duration of tNPWT and sNPWT was 9.8±11.1 days (median: 7 days; range: 3-60 days). Estimated daily mean wound area reduction was 5.8% (median value: 3.2%) with similar improvements noted for wound volume. Of the 27 wounds treated with tNPWT, eight were successfully transitioned to sNPWT once a sustained healing trajectory had been achieved. No wounds received first-line treatment with sNPWT, despite many of the wounds potentially being suitable for this approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Approximately 30% of wounds included in this review were considered eligible for transition from tNPWT to sNPWT, facilitating earlier hospital discharge without compromising clinical outcomes. More widespread adoption of sNPWT, and even first-line use for appropriate wounds, may help to reduce hospital stay while maintaining effective wound management, thereby improving the patient experience, hospital efficiency and resource utilisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound care","volume":"35 5","pages":"400-408"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2025.0579","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Despite the widespread adoption of traditional negative pressure wound therapy (tNPWT) to improve clinical outcomes for hard-to-heal (chronic) wounds and the increasing availability of single-use systems that improve patient acceptability, there is limited evidence published about when to use each type of system to optimise treatment pathways. The aim of this retrospective case review was to evaluate those wounds transitioned from tNPWT to single-use NPWT (sNPWT) in a real-world, acute care setting and review clinical outcomes, thereby informing future practice approaches.

Method: A retrospective chart review of the treatment pathway and clinical outcomes of all patients with wounds managed using NPWT presenting at a single, acute care hospital in the US from February 2023 to September 2024 was conducted. Initial tNPWT was administered continually at either -80mmHg or -120mmHg for all wounds. Wound characteristics and healing outcomes for patients transitioned from tNPWT to sNPWT during the course of treatment were reviewed.

Results: Electronic medical records of 27 patients (12 females, 15 males; with 70% aged 36-75 years) with wounds that were eligible for treatment with NPWT were available for review. Mean duration of tNPWT and sNPWT was 9.8±11.1 days (median: 7 days; range: 3-60 days). Estimated daily mean wound area reduction was 5.8% (median value: 3.2%) with similar improvements noted for wound volume. Of the 27 wounds treated with tNPWT, eight were successfully transitioned to sNPWT once a sustained healing trajectory had been achieved. No wounds received first-line treatment with sNPWT, despite many of the wounds potentially being suitable for this approach.

Conclusion: Approximately 30% of wounds included in this review were considered eligible for transition from tNPWT to sNPWT, facilitating earlier hospital discharge without compromising clinical outcomes. More widespread adoption of sNPWT, and even first-line use for appropriate wounds, may help to reduce hospital stay while maintaining effective wound management, thereby improving the patient experience, hospital efficiency and resource utilisation.

临床医生的决策过渡到一次性负压伤口治疗:分析现实世界的做法,在一个急性设置。
目的:尽管传统负压伤口疗法(tNPWT)被广泛采用,以改善难以愈合(慢性)伤口的临床结果,并且一次性使用系统的可用性越来越高,提高了患者的可接受性,但关于何时使用每种类型的系统来优化治疗途径的证据有限。本回顾性病例回顾的目的是评估在现实世界的急性护理环境中从tNPWT过渡到一次性NPWT (sNPWT)的伤口,并回顾临床结果,从而为未来的实践方法提供信息。方法:回顾性分析2023年2月至2024年9月在美国一家急性护理医院使用NPWT治疗的所有伤口患者的治疗途径和临床结果。所有伤口持续使用-80mmHg或-120mmHg的初始tNPWT。在治疗过程中,回顾了从tNPWT过渡到sNPWT患者的伤口特征和愈合结果。结果:有27例符合NPWT治疗条件的伤口患者(女性12例,男性15例,其中70%年龄在36-75岁之间)的电子病历可供查阅。tNPWT和sNPWT的平均持续时间为9.8±11.1天(中位数:7天,范围:3-60天)。估计每日平均伤口面积减少5.8%(中位数:3.2%),伤口体积也有类似的改善。在使用tNPWT治疗的27个伤口中,一旦实现持续愈合轨迹,8个伤口成功过渡到sNPWT。没有伤口接受sNPWT的一线治疗,尽管许多伤口可能适合这种方法。结论:本综述中约30%的伤口被认为符合从tNPWT过渡到sNPWT的条件,在不影响临床结果的情况下促进了早期出院。更广泛地采用sNPWT,甚至在一线使用适当的伤口,可能有助于减少住院时间,同时保持有效的伤口管理,从而改善患者体验、医院效率和资源利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of wound care
Journal of wound care DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: Journal of Wound Care (JWC) is the definitive wound-care journal and the leading source of up-to-date research and clinical information on everything related to tissue viability. The journal was first launched in 1992 and aimed at catering to the needs of the multidisciplinary team. Published monthly, the journal’s international audience includes nurses, doctors and researchers specialising in wound management and tissue viability, as well as generalists wishing to enhance their practice. In addition to cutting edge and state-of-the-art research and practice articles, JWC also covers topics related to wound-care management, education and novel therapies, as well as JWC cases supplements, a supplement dedicated solely to case reports and case series in wound care. All articles are rigorously peer-reviewed by a panel of international experts, comprised of clinicians, nurses and researchers. Specifically, JWC publishes: High quality evidence on all aspects of wound care, including leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, the diabetic foot, burns, surgical wounds, wound infection and more The latest developments and innovations in wound care through both preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of potential new treatments worldwide In-depth prospective studies of new treatment applications, as well as high-level research evidence on existing treatments Clinical case studies providing information on how to deal with complex wounds Comprehensive literature reviews on current concepts and practice, including cost-effectiveness Updates on the activities of wound care societies around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书