Addressing wound healing barriers to optimise wound progression: investigating the advanced benefits of a next-generation multilayer foam dressing.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Journal of wound care Pub Date : 2026-05-02 Epub Date: 2026-04-21 DOI:10.12968/jowc.2026.0135
Karen Ousey, Kamaluddeen Garba, Bashir Lwaleed, Daniel Fitzgerald, Damaris Williams, Jessica Winks, Varuni Brownhill, Peter Worsley
{"title":"Addressing wound healing barriers to optimise wound progression: investigating the advanced benefits of a next-generation multilayer foam dressing.","authors":"Karen Ousey, Kamaluddeen Garba, Bashir Lwaleed, Daniel Fitzgerald, Damaris Williams, Jessica Winks, Varuni Brownhill, Peter Worsley","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2026.0135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Excess wound exudate can cause tissue maceration and delayed healing. Fluctuating exudate levels, combined with the impact of gravity, increase dressing leakage risk, affecting patient quality of life. Bacteria and proteases found in hard-to-heal (chronic) wounds pose additional barriers to healing if not promptly removed. Absorbent dressings must therefore address these multiple challenges, and so were explored in this series of preclinical investigations.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Standard in vitro absorbency tests were conducted to compare the performance of several dressings with a new advanced five-layer silicone polyurethane foam dressing with superabsorbent particles (ASFS). Dressing functionality was explored using clinically relevant test conditions, including the impact of gravity and fluid bolus events on absorbency, combined with the dressing's ability to absorb and retain bacteria and proteases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ASFS demonstrated superior performance across standard absorbency tests versus most of the alternative absorbent dressings and outperformed a comparator five-layer silicone foam dressing with superabsorbent fibres (SFD) in run-off testing. Under clinically relevant dynamic bolus conditions, including gravitational challenge, no leakage was observed with ASFS, whereas dressing failure due to fluid spill or leakage was observed with SFD. ASFS was also shown to retain matrix metalloproteinases and the majority of bacteria, even under increasing fluid volumes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Functionality of absorbent wound dressings in both standard and clinically relevant tests is critical to support healthcare professionals' decision-making in selecting optimal interventions for their patients' wounds. Effective exudate management combined with removal of bacteria and proteases by the new ASFS dressing supports healthcare professional and patient confidence in continuing with daily activities, with the potential for fewer dressing changes and associated resource benefits, warranting further evaluation in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":17590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound care","volume":"35 5","pages":"365-376"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2026.0135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Excess wound exudate can cause tissue maceration and delayed healing. Fluctuating exudate levels, combined with the impact of gravity, increase dressing leakage risk, affecting patient quality of life. Bacteria and proteases found in hard-to-heal (chronic) wounds pose additional barriers to healing if not promptly removed. Absorbent dressings must therefore address these multiple challenges, and so were explored in this series of preclinical investigations.

Method: Standard in vitro absorbency tests were conducted to compare the performance of several dressings with a new advanced five-layer silicone polyurethane foam dressing with superabsorbent particles (ASFS). Dressing functionality was explored using clinically relevant test conditions, including the impact of gravity and fluid bolus events on absorbency, combined with the dressing's ability to absorb and retain bacteria and proteases.

Results: ASFS demonstrated superior performance across standard absorbency tests versus most of the alternative absorbent dressings and outperformed a comparator five-layer silicone foam dressing with superabsorbent fibres (SFD) in run-off testing. Under clinically relevant dynamic bolus conditions, including gravitational challenge, no leakage was observed with ASFS, whereas dressing failure due to fluid spill or leakage was observed with SFD. ASFS was also shown to retain matrix metalloproteinases and the majority of bacteria, even under increasing fluid volumes.

Conclusion: Functionality of absorbent wound dressings in both standard and clinically relevant tests is critical to support healthcare professionals' decision-making in selecting optimal interventions for their patients' wounds. Effective exudate management combined with removal of bacteria and proteases by the new ASFS dressing supports healthcare professional and patient confidence in continuing with daily activities, with the potential for fewer dressing changes and associated resource benefits, warranting further evaluation in clinical practice.

解决伤口愈合障碍,以优化伤口进展:研究下一代多层泡沫敷料的先进优势。
目的:过量创面渗出液可引起组织浸渍和延迟愈合。渗出液水平波动,再加上重力的影响,增加敷料渗漏的风险,影响患者的生活质量。在难以愈合的(慢性)伤口中发现的细菌和蛋白酶,如果不及时清除,会对愈合造成额外的障碍。因此,吸收性敷料必须解决这些多重挑战,因此在这一系列的临床前研究中进行了探索。方法:采用新型五层高吸湿颗粒有机硅聚氨酯泡沫敷料(ASFS)进行标准体外吸湿试验,比较几种敷料的吸湿性能。通过临床相关的测试条件来探索敷料的功能,包括重力和液体丸事件对吸收性的影响,以及敷料吸收和保留细菌和蛋白酶的能力。结果:与大多数替代吸收性敷料相比,ASFS在标准吸收性测试中表现出优越的性能,并且在径流测试中优于具有高吸收性纤维(SFD)的比较五层硅胶泡沫敷料。在临床相关的动态给药条件下,包括重力刺激,ASFS组未观察到渗漏,而SFD组观察到因液体泄漏或渗漏导致的包扎失败。ASFS还显示,即使在液体体积增加的情况下,仍能保留基质金属蛋白酶和大多数细菌。结论:在标准和临床相关测试中,吸收性伤口敷料的功能对支持医疗保健专业人员为患者伤口选择最佳干预措施的决策至关重要。有效的渗出液管理与新型ASFS敷料去除细菌和蛋白酶相结合,支持医疗保健专业人员和患者继续日常活动的信心,具有减少敷料更换和相关资源效益的潜力,值得在临床实践中进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of wound care
Journal of wound care DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: Journal of Wound Care (JWC) is the definitive wound-care journal and the leading source of up-to-date research and clinical information on everything related to tissue viability. The journal was first launched in 1992 and aimed at catering to the needs of the multidisciplinary team. Published monthly, the journal’s international audience includes nurses, doctors and researchers specialising in wound management and tissue viability, as well as generalists wishing to enhance their practice. In addition to cutting edge and state-of-the-art research and practice articles, JWC also covers topics related to wound-care management, education and novel therapies, as well as JWC cases supplements, a supplement dedicated solely to case reports and case series in wound care. All articles are rigorously peer-reviewed by a panel of international experts, comprised of clinicians, nurses and researchers. Specifically, JWC publishes: High quality evidence on all aspects of wound care, including leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, the diabetic foot, burns, surgical wounds, wound infection and more The latest developments and innovations in wound care through both preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of potential new treatments worldwide In-depth prospective studies of new treatment applications, as well as high-level research evidence on existing treatments Clinical case studies providing information on how to deal with complex wounds Comprehensive literature reviews on current concepts and practice, including cost-effectiveness Updates on the activities of wound care societies around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书