AI-Powered Gradient Echo Plural Contrast Imaging (AI-GEPCI)-A Comprehensive Neurological Protocol From a Single MRI Scan.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jeramy Lewis, Manu S Goyal, Gregory F Wu, Yuyang Hu, Alexander L Sukstanskii, Satya V V N Kothapalli, Anne H Cross, Ulugbek Kamilov, Dmitriy A Yablonskiy
{"title":"AI-Powered Gradient Echo Plural Contrast Imaging (AI-GEPCI)-A Comprehensive Neurological Protocol From a Single MRI Scan.","authors":"Jeramy Lewis, Manu S Goyal, Gregory F Wu, Yuyang Hu, Alexander L Sukstanskii, Satya V V N Kothapalli, Anne H Cross, Ulugbek Kamilov, Dmitriy A Yablonskiy","doi":"10.1002/jmri.70345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>MRI is essential for diagnosing and monitoring neurological diseases. Conventional protocols require multiple sequences to obtain complementary contrasts, increasing scan time, cost, and tolerability. Generating multiple contrasts from a single acquisition may streamline workflow while maintaining clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To train attention-based convolutional neural networks (ACNNs) to generate clinical-quality Fluid-Attenuated-Inversion-Recovery (FLAIR), Magnetization-Prepared-Rapid-Gradient-Echo (MPRAGE), R2* maps, and derived contrasts from a single Gradient Echo Plural Contrast Imaging (GEPCI) acquisition.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>Retrospective.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>43 MRI scans from individuals with multiple sclerosis (25/18 F/M, 49 ± 11 years-of-age).</p><p><strong>Field strength/sequence: </strong>3 T MRI, 3D GEPCI, MPRAGE, and FLAIR.</p><p><strong>Assessment: </strong>Technical quality of AI-generated contrasts was evaluated against directly acquired MRI using structural similarity index (SSIM). Clinical image quality was assessed by physicians. Lesion volumes and counts were obtained using automated segmentation.</p><p><strong>Statistical tests: </strong>One-sample one-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to establish the clinical quality of images. Agreement between native- and AI-derived lesion volume and lesion count measurements was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Quantitative accuracy for R2* maps was evaluated using normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AI-generated FLAIR and MPRAGE achieved mean SSIM values of 0.923 ± 0.028 and 0.935 ± 0.022, respectively. Generated R2* maps achieved a mean SSIM of 0.996 ± 0.006 and NRMSE of 0.031 ± 0.020. Physicians-assigned mean clinical quality ratings of 4.2 for GEPCI-FLAIR and 4.5 for GEPCI-MPRAGE exceeded the 4.0 clinical standard on a 1-to-5 scale. Lesion volume and count comparisons from automated segmentation showed strong agreement between AI-generated and ground-truth measurements: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.988 and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.933, ICC = 0.988 and ICC = 0.967, respectively.</p><p><strong>Data conclusion: </strong>AI-GEPCI generated multiple clinically relevant MRI contrasts from a single GEPCI acquisition with high similarity to corresponding acquired images, supporting high-quality, intrinsically co-registered multi-contrast brain evaluation.</p><p><strong>Evidence level: </strong>2.</p><p><strong>Technical efficacy: </strong>Stage 1.</p>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.70345","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: MRI is essential for diagnosing and monitoring neurological diseases. Conventional protocols require multiple sequences to obtain complementary contrasts, increasing scan time, cost, and tolerability. Generating multiple contrasts from a single acquisition may streamline workflow while maintaining clinical utility.

Purpose: To train attention-based convolutional neural networks (ACNNs) to generate clinical-quality Fluid-Attenuated-Inversion-Recovery (FLAIR), Magnetization-Prepared-Rapid-Gradient-Echo (MPRAGE), R2* maps, and derived contrasts from a single Gradient Echo Plural Contrast Imaging (GEPCI) acquisition.

Study type: Retrospective.

Population: 43 MRI scans from individuals with multiple sclerosis (25/18 F/M, 49 ± 11 years-of-age).

Field strength/sequence: 3 T MRI, 3D GEPCI, MPRAGE, and FLAIR.

Assessment: Technical quality of AI-generated contrasts was evaluated against directly acquired MRI using structural similarity index (SSIM). Clinical image quality was assessed by physicians. Lesion volumes and counts were obtained using automated segmentation.

Statistical tests: One-sample one-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to establish the clinical quality of images. Agreement between native- and AI-derived lesion volume and lesion count measurements was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Quantitative accuracy for R2* maps was evaluated using normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE).

Results: AI-generated FLAIR and MPRAGE achieved mean SSIM values of 0.923 ± 0.028 and 0.935 ± 0.022, respectively. Generated R2* maps achieved a mean SSIM of 0.996 ± 0.006 and NRMSE of 0.031 ± 0.020. Physicians-assigned mean clinical quality ratings of 4.2 for GEPCI-FLAIR and 4.5 for GEPCI-MPRAGE exceeded the 4.0 clinical standard on a 1-to-5 scale. Lesion volume and count comparisons from automated segmentation showed strong agreement between AI-generated and ground-truth measurements: R2 = 0.988 and R2 = 0.933, ICC = 0.988 and ICC = 0.967, respectively.

Data conclusion: AI-GEPCI generated multiple clinically relevant MRI contrasts from a single GEPCI acquisition with high similarity to corresponding acquired images, supporting high-quality, intrinsically co-registered multi-contrast brain evaluation.

Evidence level: 2.

Technical efficacy: Stage 1.

人工智能驱动的梯度回声多重对比成像(AI-GEPCI)-单次MRI扫描的综合神经学协议。
背景:MRI对诊断和监测神经系统疾病至关重要。传统的方案需要多个序列来获得互补对比,增加了扫描时间、成本和耐受性。从单一采集产生多个对比可以简化工作流程,同时保持临床效用。目的:训练基于注意力的卷积神经网络(acnn)生成临床质量的流体衰减反转恢复(FLAIR)、磁化准备快速梯度回波(MPRAGE)、R2*图,并从单次梯度回波多重对比成像(GEPCI)采集中得出对比。研究类型:回顾性。人群:43例多发性硬化症患者(25/18 F/M, 49±11岁)MRI扫描。场强/序列:3t MRI, 3D GEPCI, MPRAGE, FLAIR。评估:使用结构相似指数(SSIM)对直接获得的MRI评估人工智能生成对比的技术质量。临床图像质量由医师评估。使用自动分割获得病变体积和计数。统计学检验:采用单样本单侧Wilcoxon符号秩检验来确定图像的临床质量。使用类内相关系数(ICC)评估原生和人工智能衍生病变体积和病变计数测量结果之间的一致性。使用标准化均方根误差(NRMSE)评估R2*地图的定量精度。结果:人工智能生成的FLAIR和MPRAGE平均SSIM值分别为0.923±0.028和0.935±0.022。生成的R2*图谱的平均SSIM为0.996±0.006,NRMSE为0.031±0.020。医生给GEPCI-FLAIR的平均临床质量评分为4.2,GEPCI-MPRAGE的平均临床质量评分为4.5,在1到5的量表上超过了4.0的临床标准。自动分割的病变体积和计数比较显示,人工智能生成的测量结果与地面真值测量结果非常吻合:R2 = 0.988和R2 = 0.933, ICC = 0.988和ICC = 0.967。数据结论:AI-GEPCI从单个GEPCI采集生成多个临床相关的MRI对比,与相应的采集图像高度相似,支持高质量、内在共注册的多对比脑评估。证据等级:2。技术功效:第一阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.80%
发文量
494
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (JMRI) is an international journal devoted to the timely publication of basic and clinical research, educational and review articles, and other information related to the diagnostic applications of magnetic resonance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书