Comparative effects of remimazolam and propofol on intraoperative redistribution hypothermia in urologic surgery: a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
International Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2026-03-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.7150/ijms.126707
Ji-Yoon Jung, Woojin Kwon, Tae-Yun Sung
{"title":"Comparative effects of remimazolam and propofol on intraoperative redistribution hypothermia in urologic surgery: a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study.","authors":"Ji-Yoon Jung, Woojin Kwon, Tae-Yun Sung","doi":"10.7150/ijms.126707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Redistribution hypothermia, characterized by rapid core-to-peripheral heat transfer after anesthetic induction, is a major cause of perioperative hypothermia and is linked to adverse outcomes. Propofol, widely used for induction, impairs thermoregulatory vasoconstriction. Remimazolam, a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, provides greater hemodynamic stability, but its thermoregulatory effects remain unclear. This study compared remimazolam and propofol on intraoperative hypothermia in patients undergoing urologic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included adult patients (≥ 19 years) who underwent elective urologic surgery under general anesthesia between February 2024 and February 2025. Patients receiving remimazolam (0.2 mg/kg) or propofol (1.5-2.5 mg/kg) for induction were classified into respective groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed (1:1 ratio) using demographic and perioperative covariates. The primary outcome was the incidence of redistribution hypothermia, defined as core temperature < 36.0°C within the first hour after induction. Secondary outcomes included severity of hypothermia, maximum temperature decrease, perioperative temperature trends, and predictors of hypothermia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 181 patients analyzed, 71 per group were matched after PSM. Hypothermia incidence was significantly lower with remimazolam than propofol both before (16.5% vs. 50.0%, P < 0.001) and after matching (15.5% vs. 47.9%, P < 0.001). Propofol use was an independent risk factor (adjusted OR: 7.31; 95% CI: 2.81-21.58; P < 0.001). Female sex, higher BMI, and higher baseline temperature were protective factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with propofol, remimazolam was associated with lower incidence and severity of redistribution hypothermia in urologic surgery. These findings suggest thermoregulatory benefits of remimazolam, warranting confirmation in prospective trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":14031,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"23 5","pages":"1798-1807"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13133871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.126707","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Redistribution hypothermia, characterized by rapid core-to-peripheral heat transfer after anesthetic induction, is a major cause of perioperative hypothermia and is linked to adverse outcomes. Propofol, widely used for induction, impairs thermoregulatory vasoconstriction. Remimazolam, a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, provides greater hemodynamic stability, but its thermoregulatory effects remain unclear. This study compared remimazolam and propofol on intraoperative hypothermia in patients undergoing urologic surgery.

Methods: This retrospective observational study included adult patients (≥ 19 years) who underwent elective urologic surgery under general anesthesia between February 2024 and February 2025. Patients receiving remimazolam (0.2 mg/kg) or propofol (1.5-2.5 mg/kg) for induction were classified into respective groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed (1:1 ratio) using demographic and perioperative covariates. The primary outcome was the incidence of redistribution hypothermia, defined as core temperature < 36.0°C within the first hour after induction. Secondary outcomes included severity of hypothermia, maximum temperature decrease, perioperative temperature trends, and predictors of hypothermia.

Results: Among 181 patients analyzed, 71 per group were matched after PSM. Hypothermia incidence was significantly lower with remimazolam than propofol both before (16.5% vs. 50.0%, P < 0.001) and after matching (15.5% vs. 47.9%, P < 0.001). Propofol use was an independent risk factor (adjusted OR: 7.31; 95% CI: 2.81-21.58; P < 0.001). Female sex, higher BMI, and higher baseline temperature were protective factors.

Conclusion: Compared with propofol, remimazolam was associated with lower incidence and severity of redistribution hypothermia in urologic surgery. These findings suggest thermoregulatory benefits of remimazolam, warranting confirmation in prospective trials.

雷马唑仑和异丙酚对泌尿外科术中再分布低温的比较作用:回顾性倾向匹配队列研究。
背景:再分布性低温,以麻醉诱导后核心到外周的快速热传递为特征,是围手术期低温的主要原因,并与不良后果有关。异丙酚,广泛用于诱导,损害热调节血管收缩。雷马唑仑,一种新型超短效苯二氮卓类药物,提供了更大的血流动力学稳定性,但其体温调节作用尚不清楚。本研究比较了雷马唑仑和异丙酚对泌尿外科手术患者术中低温的影响。方法:本回顾性观察研究纳入了2024年2月至2025年2月在全身麻醉下接受选择性泌尿外科手术的成人患者(≥19岁)。接受雷马唑仑(0.2 mg/kg)或异丙酚(1.5-2.5 mg/kg)诱导的患者被分为不同的组。使用人口统计学和围手术期协变量进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)(1:1比例)。主要终点是再分布性低体温的发生率,定义为诱导后1小时内核心温度< 36.0°C。次要结局包括低体温的严重程度、最高体温下降、围手术期体温趋势和低体温的预测因素。结果:在分析的181例患者中,每组71例经PSM匹配。雷马唑仑与异丙酚配伍前(16.5%比50.0%,P < 0.001)和配伍后(15.5%比47.9%,P < 0.001)的低体温发生率均显著低于异丙酚。异丙酚使用是独立危险因素(调整后OR: 7.31; 95% CI: 2.81-21.58; P < 0.001)。女性、较高的身体质量指数和较高的基线温度是保护因素。结论:与异丙酚相比,雷马唑仑在泌尿外科手术中可降低再分布性低温的发生率和严重程度。这些发现表明雷马唑仑具有体温调节作用,值得在前瞻性试验中证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Sciences
International Journal of Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: Original research papers, reviews, and short research communications in any medical related area can be submitted to the Journal on the understanding that the work has not been published previously in whole or part and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Manuscripts in basic science and clinical medicine are both considered. There is no restriction on the length of research papers and reviews, although authors are encouraged to be concise. Short research communication is limited to be under 2500 words.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书