Maryam Javidi, Ali Kazemian, Mina Zarei, Hasti Erfanian Taghvaei, Melika Mohammadi
{"title":"Evaluating the Influence of Access Cavity Design to Detect Additional Canals of Mandibular Premolars: An In Vitro Study.","authors":"Maryam Javidi, Ali Kazemian, Mina Zarei, Hasti Erfanian Taghvaei, Melika Mohammadi","doi":"10.1155/ijod/5575879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present in vitro study aimed to investigate the impact of three different access cavity types on the identification of the additional canals in mandibular premolars.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>A total of 67 mandibular premolars were obtained, and periapical radiographs and CBCT scans were taken. Then, the access cavities were created in three stages: ultraconservative access cavity (UltraAC), conservative access cavity (CAC), and traditional access cavity (TAC). After completing each stage, the search for the second and third canals was conducted under a surgical microscope, using ultrasonic troughing. The differences between the three access cavity designs in identifying the second and third canals were compared using the chi-squared test. Additionally, the agreement between periapical radiographs, CBCT, and the operator in finding the canals was determined by measuring the kappa coefficient (<i>p</i>.value = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>62.68%, 34.32%, and 2.98% of the samples had one, two, and three root canals, respectively. The agreement between PA radiographs and CBCT images in identifying the number of canals was almost perfect (kappa: 0.968; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Additionally, the agreement between the operator and initial PA radiographs and between the operator and CBCT in detecting the number of canals was substantial (kappa: 0.735 and 0.794, respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.001). No difference was observed between the access cavity types in identifying the second and third canals. Of the two three-canal teeth, one was found in the TAC stage and the other in the CAC stage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When the access cavity of mandibular premolars is prepared using magnification with a microscope and ultrasonic troughing, the design of the access cavity has no effect on identifying the additional canals in these teeth.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Mandibular premolars are reported to have more than one canal, and the effect of different access cavities has not been evaluated in canal detection of these teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":13947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dentistry","volume":"2026 ","pages":"5575879"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13126083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/5575879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The present in vitro study aimed to investigate the impact of three different access cavity types on the identification of the additional canals in mandibular premolars.
Methods and materials: A total of 67 mandibular premolars were obtained, and periapical radiographs and CBCT scans were taken. Then, the access cavities were created in three stages: ultraconservative access cavity (UltraAC), conservative access cavity (CAC), and traditional access cavity (TAC). After completing each stage, the search for the second and third canals was conducted under a surgical microscope, using ultrasonic troughing. The differences between the three access cavity designs in identifying the second and third canals were compared using the chi-squared test. Additionally, the agreement between periapical radiographs, CBCT, and the operator in finding the canals was determined by measuring the kappa coefficient (p.value = 0.05).
Results: 62.68%, 34.32%, and 2.98% of the samples had one, two, and three root canals, respectively. The agreement between PA radiographs and CBCT images in identifying the number of canals was almost perfect (kappa: 0.968; p < 0.001). Additionally, the agreement between the operator and initial PA radiographs and between the operator and CBCT in detecting the number of canals was substantial (kappa: 0.735 and 0.794, respectively; p < 0.001). No difference was observed between the access cavity types in identifying the second and third canals. Of the two three-canal teeth, one was found in the TAC stage and the other in the CAC stage.
Conclusion: When the access cavity of mandibular premolars is prepared using magnification with a microscope and ultrasonic troughing, the design of the access cavity has no effect on identifying the additional canals in these teeth.
Clinical relevance: Mandibular premolars are reported to have more than one canal, and the effect of different access cavities has not been evaluated in canal detection of these teeth.