Evaluating the Influence of Access Cavity Design to Detect Additional Canals of Mandibular Premolars: An In Vitro Study.

IF 2.2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
International Journal of Dentistry Pub Date : 2026-04-29 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ijod/5575879
Maryam Javidi, Ali Kazemian, Mina Zarei, Hasti Erfanian Taghvaei, Melika Mohammadi
{"title":"Evaluating the Influence of Access Cavity Design to Detect Additional Canals of Mandibular Premolars: An In Vitro Study.","authors":"Maryam Javidi, Ali Kazemian, Mina Zarei, Hasti Erfanian Taghvaei, Melika Mohammadi","doi":"10.1155/ijod/5575879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present in vitro study aimed to investigate the impact of three different access cavity types on the identification of the additional canals in mandibular premolars.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>A total of 67 mandibular premolars were obtained, and periapical radiographs and CBCT scans were taken. Then, the access cavities were created in three stages: ultraconservative access cavity (UltraAC), conservative access cavity (CAC), and traditional access cavity (TAC). After completing each stage, the search for the second and third canals was conducted under a surgical microscope, using ultrasonic troughing. The differences between the three access cavity designs in identifying the second and third canals were compared using the chi-squared test. Additionally, the agreement between periapical radiographs, CBCT, and the operator in finding the canals was determined by measuring the kappa coefficient (<i>p</i>.value = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>62.68%, 34.32%, and 2.98% of the samples had one, two, and three root canals, respectively. The agreement between PA radiographs and CBCT images in identifying the number of canals was almost perfect (kappa: 0.968; <i>p</i>  < 0.001). Additionally, the agreement between the operator and initial PA radiographs and between the operator and CBCT in detecting the number of canals was substantial (kappa: 0.735 and 0.794, respectively; <i>p</i>  < 0.001). No difference was observed between the access cavity types in identifying the second and third canals. Of the two three-canal teeth, one was found in the TAC stage and the other in the CAC stage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When the access cavity of mandibular premolars is prepared using magnification with a microscope and ultrasonic troughing, the design of the access cavity has no effect on identifying the additional canals in these teeth.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Mandibular premolars are reported to have more than one canal, and the effect of different access cavities has not been evaluated in canal detection of these teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":13947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dentistry","volume":"2026 ","pages":"5575879"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13126083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/5575879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The present in vitro study aimed to investigate the impact of three different access cavity types on the identification of the additional canals in mandibular premolars.

Methods and materials: A total of 67 mandibular premolars were obtained, and periapical radiographs and CBCT scans were taken. Then, the access cavities were created in three stages: ultraconservative access cavity (UltraAC), conservative access cavity (CAC), and traditional access cavity (TAC). After completing each stage, the search for the second and third canals was conducted under a surgical microscope, using ultrasonic troughing. The differences between the three access cavity designs in identifying the second and third canals were compared using the chi-squared test. Additionally, the agreement between periapical radiographs, CBCT, and the operator in finding the canals was determined by measuring the kappa coefficient (p.value = 0.05).

Results: 62.68%, 34.32%, and 2.98% of the samples had one, two, and three root canals, respectively. The agreement between PA radiographs and CBCT images in identifying the number of canals was almost perfect (kappa: 0.968; p  < 0.001). Additionally, the agreement between the operator and initial PA radiographs and between the operator and CBCT in detecting the number of canals was substantial (kappa: 0.735 and 0.794, respectively; p  < 0.001). No difference was observed between the access cavity types in identifying the second and third canals. Of the two three-canal teeth, one was found in the TAC stage and the other in the CAC stage.

Conclusion: When the access cavity of mandibular premolars is prepared using magnification with a microscope and ultrasonic troughing, the design of the access cavity has no effect on identifying the additional canals in these teeth.

Clinical relevance: Mandibular premolars are reported to have more than one canal, and the effect of different access cavities has not been evaluated in canal detection of these teeth.

评估通道腔设计对检测下颌前磨牙附加管的影响:一项体外研究。
目的:探讨三种不同的入路腔类型对下颌前磨牙附加根管识别的影响。方法与材料:取下颌前磨牙67颗,行根尖周x线片及CBCT扫描。然后,分超保守通道腔(UltraAC)、保守通道腔(CAC)和传统通道腔(TAC)三个阶段构建通道腔。每个阶段完成后,在手术显微镜下使用超声槽检查第二和第三根根管。使用卡方检验比较三种通道腔设计在识别第二和第三根管方面的差异。此外,通过测量kappa系数(p值= 0.05)来确定根尖周x线片、CBCT和操作者在发现根管方面的一致性。结果:有1根管、2根管和3根管的分别占62.68%、34.32%和2.98%。PA x线片与CBCT图像在识别肛管数量上的一致性几乎完全(kappa: 0.968; p < 0.001)。此外,操作人员与初始PA x线片之间以及操作人员与CBCT之间在检测管道数量方面的一致性非常高(kappa分别为0.735和0.794,p < 0.001)。在第二和第三根根管的识别上,不同的通道腔类型没有差异。两颗三管牙,一颗在TAC期,另一颗在CAC期。结论:采用显微镜放大和超声凿槽法制备下颌前磨牙通道腔时,通道腔的设计对识别下颌前磨牙的附加根管无影响。临床相关性:据报道,下颌前磨牙有多个根管,不同的通道腔在这些牙齿的根管检测中的作用尚未得到评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Dentistry
International Journal of Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
219
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书