Comparative Evaluation of Buccal Cortical Bone Thickness in the Posterior Mandible Across Skeletal Patterns: A CBCT Study in a Sample of Iranians.

IF 2.2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
International Journal of Dentistry Pub Date : 2026-04-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ijod/1205123
Paniz Ranji, Kazem Dalaei, Melika Mansouri, Yaser Safi, Maede Jafarian Amiri, Mehdi Hosseinzadeh
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Buccal Cortical Bone Thickness in the Posterior Mandible Across Skeletal Patterns: A CBCT Study in a Sample of Iranians.","authors":"Paniz Ranji, Kazem Dalaei, Melika Mansouri, Yaser Safi, Maede Jafarian Amiri, Mehdi Hosseinzadeh","doi":"10.1155/ijod/1205123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate buccal cortical bone thickness in the posterior mandible across different sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective observational study, cortical buccal bone thickness between posterior teeth was assessed at 4 and 7 mm distances from the alveolar crest using CBCT images of 112 Iranian participants aged 18-60 years. Participants were classified into six groups: Class I normal angle, Class I low angle, Class I high angle, Class II normal angle, Class II low angle, and Class II high angle. Statistical analyses included the Shapiro-Wilk test, Levene's test, multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), paired-sample <i>t</i>-test, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), with a significance level set at <i>α</i> = 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cortical bone thickness generally increased from anterior to posterior regions and from the alveolar crest toward the basal jaw in Class II and both high- and low-angle groups, with exceptions observed in Class I and normal-angle individuals. Statistically significant differences in cortical bone thickness were observed between Class I and Class II skeletal patterns at specific posterior sites, with Class I individuals consistently exhibiting greater thickness. Differences related to vertical skeletal pattern were limited, observed only at the distal canine (4-mm level). Sex, age, and side-to-side differences influenced cortical thickness in certain regions, with slightly greater thickness on the left side at some measurement sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Buccal cortical bone thickness in the posterior mandible varies significantly with the sagittal skeletal pattern, whereas the vertical skeletal pattern has minimal influence.</p>","PeriodicalId":13947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dentistry","volume":"2026 ","pages":"1205123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13131059/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/1205123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate buccal cortical bone thickness in the posterior mandible across different sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Materials and methods: In this retrospective observational study, cortical buccal bone thickness between posterior teeth was assessed at 4 and 7 mm distances from the alveolar crest using CBCT images of 112 Iranian participants aged 18-60 years. Participants were classified into six groups: Class I normal angle, Class I low angle, Class I high angle, Class II normal angle, Class II low angle, and Class II high angle. Statistical analyses included the Shapiro-Wilk test, Levene's test, multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), paired-sample t-test, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), with a significance level set at α = 0.05.

Results: Cortical bone thickness generally increased from anterior to posterior regions and from the alveolar crest toward the basal jaw in Class II and both high- and low-angle groups, with exceptions observed in Class I and normal-angle individuals. Statistically significant differences in cortical bone thickness were observed between Class I and Class II skeletal patterns at specific posterior sites, with Class I individuals consistently exhibiting greater thickness. Differences related to vertical skeletal pattern were limited, observed only at the distal canine (4-mm level). Sex, age, and side-to-side differences influenced cortical thickness in certain regions, with slightly greater thickness on the left side at some measurement sites.

Conclusions: Buccal cortical bone thickness in the posterior mandible varies significantly with the sagittal skeletal pattern, whereas the vertical skeletal pattern has minimal influence.

不同骨骼模式下后下颌颊皮质骨厚度的比较评估:伊朗样本的CBCT研究。
目的:本研究旨在利用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评估不同矢状和垂直骨骼模式下下颌骨后颊皮质骨厚度。材料和方法:在这项回顾性观察研究中,使用112名年龄在18-60岁的伊朗参与者的CBCT图像,评估了距牙槽嵴4和7毫米距离的后牙皮质颊骨厚度。参与者被分为6组:第一类法线角、第一类低角、第一类高角、第二类法线角、第二类低角和第二类高角。统计分析采用Shapiro-Wilk检验、Levene检验、多元方差分析(MANOVA)、配对样本t检验和类内相关系数(ICC),显著性水平设为α = 0.05。结果:在II类和高、低角度组中,皮质骨厚度从前到后区域以及从牙槽嵴到下颌基底区普遍增加,在I类和正常角度组中观察到例外。在特定的后部部位,在I类和II类骨骼模式之间观察到的皮质骨厚度在统计学上有显著差异,其中I类个体始终表现出更大的厚度。与垂直骨骼模式相关的差异有限,仅在犬远端(4毫米水平)观察到。性别、年龄和两侧差异影响某些区域的皮质厚度,在某些测量部位,左侧的厚度略大。结论:后下颌颊皮质骨厚度随矢状骨型变化显著,而垂直骨型影响最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Dentistry
International Journal of Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
219
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书