Pain Retrained: Outcomes Analysis of an Online, Interdisciplinary Chronic Pain Education Programme.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Maura McCarron, Francis Agnew, Claire Briggs, Jason Brooks, Martin Dempster, Danielle Rainey, Kevin E Vowles
{"title":"Pain Retrained: Outcomes Analysis of an Online, Interdisciplinary Chronic Pain Education Programme.","authors":"Maura McCarron, Francis Agnew, Claire Briggs, Jason Brooks, Martin Dempster, Danielle Rainey, Kevin E Vowles","doi":"10.1002/ejp.70288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Videoconferencing to deliver chronic pain education offers improved accessibility and scalability. However, evidence regarding such interventions is largely absent, thus it is necessary to assess their clinical value. This study evaluated the impact of a group-based interdisciplinary chronic pain education programme, Pain Retrained, delivered via videoconferencing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a single-arm longitudinal design with measures collected at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up. Six weekly online sessions of two hours each were delivered to groups as the first point of contact with a secondary care pain service. Changes were evaluated via multilevel Structural Equation Modelling. Indices of acceptability were assessed post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 261 participants (62.1% female) completed Pain Retrained. There was sustained change through follow-up for pain self-efficacy and social functioning and post-intervention only change for depression and pain-anxiety. Change was non-significant for pain intensity and pain interference. Effect sizes ranged from negligible to medium (range Cohen's d = 0.03-0.74). The majority of participants, 85.4% reported improved understanding of pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There has been growing interest in advancing pain education through online modalities. This study shows that live, clinician-led online pain education is feasible and acceptable for people with chronic pain, with high satisfaction and perceived utility. These data are among the first to examine the effectiveness of this approach in relation to clinical outcomes. While outcomes were mixed, reflecting the complexity of chronic pain and limits of education alone, these findings extend existing knowledge by demonstrating this approach offers an accessible and scalable adjunct to care.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>The expansion of digital health interventions has outpaced evidence supporting their use in chronic pain care. By providing longitudinal, practice-based evidence from a novel large-scale programme, this study provides timely evidence to guide integration of online education into care pathways. It informs service planning while identifying key targets for optimisation, including integration with behaviour change strategies. The work also establishes priorities for further research to test efficacy and mechanisms of action in digitally delivered pain care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"30 5","pages":"e70288"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13138362/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.70288","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Videoconferencing to deliver chronic pain education offers improved accessibility and scalability. However, evidence regarding such interventions is largely absent, thus it is necessary to assess their clinical value. This study evaluated the impact of a group-based interdisciplinary chronic pain education programme, Pain Retrained, delivered via videoconferencing.

Methods: This study employed a single-arm longitudinal design with measures collected at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up. Six weekly online sessions of two hours each were delivered to groups as the first point of contact with a secondary care pain service. Changes were evaluated via multilevel Structural Equation Modelling. Indices of acceptability were assessed post-intervention.

Results: In total, 261 participants (62.1% female) completed Pain Retrained. There was sustained change through follow-up for pain self-efficacy and social functioning and post-intervention only change for depression and pain-anxiety. Change was non-significant for pain intensity and pain interference. Effect sizes ranged from negligible to medium (range Cohen's d = 0.03-0.74). The majority of participants, 85.4% reported improved understanding of pain.

Conclusion: There has been growing interest in advancing pain education through online modalities. This study shows that live, clinician-led online pain education is feasible and acceptable for people with chronic pain, with high satisfaction and perceived utility. These data are among the first to examine the effectiveness of this approach in relation to clinical outcomes. While outcomes were mixed, reflecting the complexity of chronic pain and limits of education alone, these findings extend existing knowledge by demonstrating this approach offers an accessible and scalable adjunct to care.

Significance: The expansion of digital health interventions has outpaced evidence supporting their use in chronic pain care. By providing longitudinal, practice-based evidence from a novel large-scale programme, this study provides timely evidence to guide integration of online education into care pathways. It informs service planning while identifying key targets for optimisation, including integration with behaviour change strategies. The work also establishes priorities for further research to test efficacy and mechanisms of action in digitally delivered pain care.

疼痛再训练:在线跨学科慢性疼痛教育计划的结果分析。
背景:视频会议提供慢性疼痛教育提供了更好的可访问性和可扩展性。然而,关于这些干预措施的证据在很大程度上是缺乏的,因此有必要评估其临床价值。本研究评估了以小组为基础的跨学科慢性疼痛教育项目的影响,疼痛再培训,通过视频会议交付。方法:本研究采用单臂纵向设计,在基线、干预后和3个月随访时收集测量数据。每周6次,每次2小时的在线会议作为与二级护理疼痛服务的第一个接触点提供给小组。通过多层结构方程模型评估变化。干预后评估可接受性指标。结果:共有261名参与者(62.1%为女性)完成了疼痛再训练。通过随访,疼痛自我效能和社会功能有持续的变化,干预后只有抑郁和疼痛焦虑有变化。疼痛强度和疼痛干扰变化不显著。效应大小范围从可忽略到中等(Cohen’s d = 0.03-0.74)。大多数参与者(85.4%)表示对疼痛的理解有所提高。结论:人们对通过在线方式推进疼痛教育越来越感兴趣。本研究表明,临床医生主导的实时在线疼痛教育对慢性疼痛患者来说是可行和可接受的,具有很高的满意度和感知效用。这些数据是第一批检验这种方法与临床结果的有效性的数据。虽然结果好坏参半,反映了慢性疼痛的复杂性和教育本身的局限性,但这些发现通过证明这种方法提供了一种可获得和可扩展的辅助护理,扩展了现有的知识。意义:数字健康干预措施的扩展速度超过了支持其在慢性疼痛护理中使用的证据。通过提供纵向的、基于实践的证据,本研究提供了及时的证据来指导将在线教育整合到护理途径中。它为服务规划提供信息,同时确定优化的关键目标,包括与行为改变策略的集成。这项工作还为进一步研究确定了优先事项,以测试数字化提供的疼痛护理的功效和作用机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Pain
European Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Pain (EJP) publishes clinical and basic science research papers relevant to all aspects of pain and its management, including specialties such as anaesthesia, dentistry, neurology and neurosurgery, orthopaedics, palliative care, pharmacology, physiology, psychiatry, psychology and rehabilitation; socio-economic aspects of pain are also covered. Regular sections in the journal are as follows: • Editorials and Commentaries • Position Papers and Guidelines • Reviews • Original Articles • Letters • Bookshelf The journal particularly welcomes clinical trials, which are published on an occasional basis. Research articles are published under the following subject headings: • Neurobiology • Neurology • Experimental Pharmacology • Clinical Pharmacology • Psychology • Behavioural Therapy • Epidemiology • Cancer Pain • Acute Pain • Clinical Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书