Effect of preoperative fasting on acute postoperative pain following cesarean section: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 1.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Annals of Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2026-04-14 eCollection Date: 2026-05-01 DOI:10.1097/MS9.0000000000004865
Huiyan Xu, Yanshuang Wang, Dongge Niu, MingJun Xu, Lan Yao
{"title":"Effect of preoperative fasting on acute postoperative pain following cesarean section: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Huiyan Xu, Yanshuang Wang, Dongge Niu, MingJun Xu, Lan Yao","doi":"10.1097/MS9.0000000000004865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preoperative fasting is a cornerstone of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols in cesarean delivery, primarily aimed at reducing aspiration risk. However, its impact on acute postoperative pain remains unclear. This study addresses a critical evidence gap regarding whether adherence to ERAS-compliant fasting guidelines influences post-cesarean pain intensity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 329 women who underwent cesarean sections at the hospital between March and December 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Women were categorized based on adherence to ERAS fasting guidelines (≤8 h solids, ≤2 h clear fluids). The primary outcome was the 24-h postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score. Univariate and multivariable linear regression models were used to assess the association between fasting compliance and VAS scores, adjusting for key covariates including age, body mass index, comorbidities, anesthesia type, surgical duration, and intraoperative morphine use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women adhering to ERAS fasting protocols had significantly lower mean 24-h VAS scores compared to non-adherent women (β = -0.6; 95% confidence interval: -1.2, -0.1; <i>P</i> = 0.029). This association remained significant after minor (β = -0.6; <i>P</i> = 0.046) and partial adjustment (β = -0.6; <i>P</i> = 0.038), though it attenuated to non-significance after full adjustment including epidural morphine (β = -0.5; <i>P</i> = 0.137). Subgroup analyses suggested consistent directional effects, but detailed subgroup results are reported in the main text.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adherence to ERAS fasting guidelines is associated with a modest but statistically significant reduction in acute postoperative pain after cesarean section. While the clinical relevance of a 0.6-point VAS difference may be limited, these findings support integrating standardized preoperative fasting into obstetric ERAS pathways as a safe, low-cost component of multimodal pain management and enhanced recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8025,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","volume":"88 5","pages":"2743-2750"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13132321/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000004865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preoperative fasting is a cornerstone of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols in cesarean delivery, primarily aimed at reducing aspiration risk. However, its impact on acute postoperative pain remains unclear. This study addresses a critical evidence gap regarding whether adherence to ERAS-compliant fasting guidelines influences post-cesarean pain intensity.

Methods: Data from 329 women who underwent cesarean sections at the hospital between March and December 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Women were categorized based on adherence to ERAS fasting guidelines (≤8 h solids, ≤2 h clear fluids). The primary outcome was the 24-h postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score. Univariate and multivariable linear regression models were used to assess the association between fasting compliance and VAS scores, adjusting for key covariates including age, body mass index, comorbidities, anesthesia type, surgical duration, and intraoperative morphine use.

Results: Women adhering to ERAS fasting protocols had significantly lower mean 24-h VAS scores compared to non-adherent women (β = -0.6; 95% confidence interval: -1.2, -0.1; P = 0.029). This association remained significant after minor (β = -0.6; P = 0.046) and partial adjustment (β = -0.6; P = 0.038), though it attenuated to non-significance after full adjustment including epidural morphine (β = -0.5; P = 0.137). Subgroup analyses suggested consistent directional effects, but detailed subgroup results are reported in the main text.

Conclusions: Adherence to ERAS fasting guidelines is associated with a modest but statistically significant reduction in acute postoperative pain after cesarean section. While the clinical relevance of a 0.6-point VAS difference may be limited, these findings support integrating standardized preoperative fasting into obstetric ERAS pathways as a safe, low-cost component of multimodal pain management and enhanced recovery.

术前禁食对剖宫产术后急性疼痛的影响:回顾性队列研究。
背景:术前禁食是剖宫产术后增强恢复(ERAS)方案的基石,主要目的是降低误吸风险。然而,其对急性术后疼痛的影响尚不清楚。本研究解决了一个关键的证据缺口,即遵守ERAS-compliant禁食指南是否会影响剖宫产后疼痛强度。方法:回顾性分析2024年3月至12月期间在医院接受剖宫产手术的329名妇女的资料。根据ERAS禁食指南(≤8小时固体,≤2小时透明液体)对女性进行分类。主要观察指标为术后24小时视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分。使用单变量和多变量线性回归模型评估禁食依从性与VAS评分之间的关系,调整关键协变量包括年龄、体重指数、合并症、麻醉类型、手术时间和术中吗啡使用。结果:坚持ERAS禁食方案的女性与未坚持的女性相比,平均24小时VAS评分显著降低(β = -0.6; 95%可信区间:-1.2,-0.1;P = 0.029)。在轻度调整(β = -0.6, P = 0.046)和部分调整(β = -0.6, P = 0.038)后,这种相关性仍然显著,但在包括硬膜外吗啡在内的完全调整后,这种相关性减弱至无显著性(β = -0.5, P = 0.137)。子组分析表明方向效应一致,但详细的子组结果在正文中报告。结论:遵守ERAS禁食指南与剖宫产术后急性疼痛的适度减少有关,但有统计学意义。虽然0.6分VAS差异的临床相关性可能有限,但这些发现支持将标准化术前禁食纳入产科ERAS路径,作为多模式疼痛管理和增强恢复的安全、低成本组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Medicine and Surgery
Annals of Medicine and Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
1665
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书