Malic Acid Supplementation on Rumen Fermentation, Nutrient Digestibility, Performance and Carcass Traits in Lambs: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression Considering Dietary Moderators.
IF 2.7 2区 农林科学Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Leonardo Tombesi da Rocha, Fernando Skonieski, Tiago Antonio Del Valle, Francine Basso Facco, Paola de Oliveira Selau, Kamily Pech Oliveira, Amanda de Vasconcelos Zucheto, Julio Viégas
{"title":"Malic Acid Supplementation on Rumen Fermentation, Nutrient Digestibility, Performance and Carcass Traits in Lambs: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression Considering Dietary Moderators.","authors":"Leonardo Tombesi da Rocha, Fernando Skonieski, Tiago Antonio Del Valle, Francine Basso Facco, Paola de Oliveira Selau, Kamily Pech Oliveira, Amanda de Vasconcelos Zucheto, Julio Viégas","doi":"10.3390/ani16081263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This meta-analysis and meta-regression evaluated how malic acid supplementation modulates rumen fermentation and its consequences for growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and carcass traits in lambs. Effect sizes (ES) were estimated using a random-effects model. Dietary composition was explored by meta-regression as a key source of heterogeneity, and subgroup analyses were used to compare free malic acid (FMA) and malate. Ruminal pH was not affected by malic acid supplementation. In contrast, total volatile fatty acid concentration increased with malic acid supplementation, particularly in studies using FMA. No effects were detected for propionate concentration, whereas acetate concentration increased (ES = 0.502; <i>p</i> = 0.036). A tendency toward a reduced ruminal acetate proportion was observed (ES = -0.683; <i>p</i> = 0.072). Malic acid supplementation tended (<i>p</i> = 0.057) to increase body weight gain (BWG; ES = 0.325) and final body weight (FBW; ES = 0.234). Malic acid supplementation did not affect carcass traits or overall nutrient digestibility. Meta-regression consistently identified fiber intake-related variables as major moderators of the effects of malic acid. Overall, the effects of malic acid supplementation on lamb performance appear to be primarily driven by its modulation of rumen fermentation and strongly conditioned by dietary context.</p>","PeriodicalId":7955,"journal":{"name":"Animals","volume":"16 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13113034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animals","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16081263","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This meta-analysis and meta-regression evaluated how malic acid supplementation modulates rumen fermentation and its consequences for growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and carcass traits in lambs. Effect sizes (ES) were estimated using a random-effects model. Dietary composition was explored by meta-regression as a key source of heterogeneity, and subgroup analyses were used to compare free malic acid (FMA) and malate. Ruminal pH was not affected by malic acid supplementation. In contrast, total volatile fatty acid concentration increased with malic acid supplementation, particularly in studies using FMA. No effects were detected for propionate concentration, whereas acetate concentration increased (ES = 0.502; p = 0.036). A tendency toward a reduced ruminal acetate proportion was observed (ES = -0.683; p = 0.072). Malic acid supplementation tended (p = 0.057) to increase body weight gain (BWG; ES = 0.325) and final body weight (FBW; ES = 0.234). Malic acid supplementation did not affect carcass traits or overall nutrient digestibility. Meta-regression consistently identified fiber intake-related variables as major moderators of the effects of malic acid. Overall, the effects of malic acid supplementation on lamb performance appear to be primarily driven by its modulation of rumen fermentation and strongly conditioned by dietary context.
本荟萃分析和荟萃回归评估了苹果酸补充如何调节瘤胃发酵及其对羔羊生长性能、营养物质消化率和胴体性状的影响。使用随机效应模型估计效应量(ES)。通过meta回归研究膳食组成作为异质性的主要来源,并采用亚组分析比较游离苹果酸(FMA)和苹果酸。添加苹果酸对瘤胃pH值无影响。相反,总挥发性脂肪酸浓度随着苹果酸的补充而增加,特别是在使用FMA的研究中。对丙酸浓度无影响,而乙酸浓度增加(ES = 0.502; p = 0.036)。瘤胃乙酸比例呈降低趋势(ES = -0.683; p = 0.072)。添加苹果酸有增加体增重(BWG, ES = 0.325)和末重(FBW, ES = 0.234)的趋势(p = 0.057)。添加苹果酸对胴体性状和营养物质消化率没有影响。元回归一致确定纤维摄入相关变量是苹果酸影响的主要调节因子。综上所述,添加苹果酸对羔羊生产性能的影响似乎主要受其对瘤胃发酵的调节作用驱动,并受到饲粮环境的强烈制约。
AnimalsAgricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
3015
审稿时长
20.52 days
期刊介绍:
Animals (ISSN 2076-2615) is an international and interdisciplinary scholarly open access journal. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications, and short notes that are relevant to any field of study that involves animals, including zoology, ethnozoology, animal science, animal ethics and animal welfare. However, preference will be given to those articles that provide an understanding of animals within a larger context (i.e., the animals'' interactions with the outside world, including humans). There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental details and/or method of study, must be provided for research articles. Articles submitted that involve subjecting animals to unnecessary pain or suffering will not be accepted, and all articles must be submitted with the necessary ethical approval (please refer to the Ethical Guidelines for more information).