Reducing Protein Content with and Without Yeast Probiotic Actisaf Sc 47 Supplementation in the Diet of Dairy Cow: Effects on Nitrogen Use, Digestibility, and Rumen Microbial Protein.

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Animals Pub Date : 2026-04-21 DOI:10.3390/ani16081277
Nizar Salah, Brigitte Gestes, Pauline Ly, Axel Blancou, Kheira Hadjeba, Julie Schulthess, Julie Duclos, Eric Pinloche
{"title":"Reducing Protein Content with and Without Yeast Probiotic Actisaf Sc 47 Supplementation in the Diet of Dairy Cow: Effects on Nitrogen Use, Digestibility, and Rumen Microbial Protein.","authors":"Nizar Salah, Brigitte Gestes, Pauline Ly, Axel Blancou, Kheira Hadjeba, Julie Schulthess, Julie Duclos, Eric Pinloche","doi":"10.3390/ani16081277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of lowering crude protein (CP) levels in the diet of dairy cows alone or in combination with a yeast probiotic on nitrogen utilization, digestion, and rumen microbial protein synthesis. In total, six cows were included in a 3 × 3 Latin square design. Each study period consisted of 23 days of diet adaptation and 5 days for sampling and data collection. Cows were randomly assigned to one of the three diets according to protein level and supplementation: control diet with 16.5 CP%DM (CTR), a diet with 14.5 CP%DM without Actisaf Sc 47 supplementation (LCP), and a diet with 14.5 CP%DM with Actisaf Sc 47 supplementation at 5 g/cow/day (LCPActisaf). Reducing protein content from 16.5 to 14.5 CP%DM alone or in combination with Actisaf Sc 47 significantly reduced nitrogen intake. Regarding fecal nitrogen (FN), no difference was observed between the CTR and LCP groups. However, FN was significantly lower in the LCPActisaf group compared with that of the CTR group. There was a tendency for lower FN in the LCPActisaf group compared with the LCP group. Compared with CTR, urinary nitrogen (UN) was not impacted by LCP but tended to decrease with LCPActisaf (<i>p</i> = 0.1). Compared with CTR and LCP, supplementation with Actisaf Sc 47 increased nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). A tendency for higher NUE was observed in the LCP group compared with the CTR group (<i>p</i> = 0.07). Crude protein digestibility was similar between the CTR and LCP groups and tended to increase with Actisaf Sc 47 supplementation. Compared with CTR, neutral detergent fiber (NDF) digestibility was not impacted by LCP but increased by LCPActisaf (<i>p</i> = 0.05); LCPActisaf did not impact NDF digestibility compared with LCP. Organic matter (OM) digestibility was similar among treatments. Although there was no difference between the three groups on rumen microbial protein synthesis (RMP), supplementation with Actisaf Sc 47 increased RMP. Reducing protein content in combination with Actisaf Sc 47 appears to be a good strategy, enabling both the environmental footprint linked to nitrogen losses to be reduced, and fiber digestibility and rumen microbial protein synthesis to increase.</p>","PeriodicalId":7955,"journal":{"name":"Animals","volume":"16 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13113429/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animals","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16081277","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of lowering crude protein (CP) levels in the diet of dairy cows alone or in combination with a yeast probiotic on nitrogen utilization, digestion, and rumen microbial protein synthesis. In total, six cows were included in a 3 × 3 Latin square design. Each study period consisted of 23 days of diet adaptation and 5 days for sampling and data collection. Cows were randomly assigned to one of the three diets according to protein level and supplementation: control diet with 16.5 CP%DM (CTR), a diet with 14.5 CP%DM without Actisaf Sc 47 supplementation (LCP), and a diet with 14.5 CP%DM with Actisaf Sc 47 supplementation at 5 g/cow/day (LCPActisaf). Reducing protein content from 16.5 to 14.5 CP%DM alone or in combination with Actisaf Sc 47 significantly reduced nitrogen intake. Regarding fecal nitrogen (FN), no difference was observed between the CTR and LCP groups. However, FN was significantly lower in the LCPActisaf group compared with that of the CTR group. There was a tendency for lower FN in the LCPActisaf group compared with the LCP group. Compared with CTR, urinary nitrogen (UN) was not impacted by LCP but tended to decrease with LCPActisaf (p = 0.1). Compared with CTR and LCP, supplementation with Actisaf Sc 47 increased nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) (p < 0.05). A tendency for higher NUE was observed in the LCP group compared with the CTR group (p = 0.07). Crude protein digestibility was similar between the CTR and LCP groups and tended to increase with Actisaf Sc 47 supplementation. Compared with CTR, neutral detergent fiber (NDF) digestibility was not impacted by LCP but increased by LCPActisaf (p = 0.05); LCPActisaf did not impact NDF digestibility compared with LCP. Organic matter (OM) digestibility was similar among treatments. Although there was no difference between the three groups on rumen microbial protein synthesis (RMP), supplementation with Actisaf Sc 47 increased RMP. Reducing protein content in combination with Actisaf Sc 47 appears to be a good strategy, enabling both the environmental footprint linked to nitrogen losses to be reduced, and fiber digestibility and rumen microbial protein synthesis to increase.

饲粮中添加和不添加酵母益生菌Actisaf Sc 47降低奶牛蛋白质含量:对氮利用、消化率和瘤胃微生物蛋白的影响
本试验旨在评价单独或联合使用酵母益生菌降低奶牛饲粮粗蛋白质(CP)水平对氮利用、消化和瘤胃微生物蛋白质合成的影响。共有6头奶牛被纳入3 × 3拉丁方形设计。每个试验期为23 d的日粮适应期和5 d的取样和数据收集期。根据蛋白质水平和添加量,将奶牛随机分配到3种饲粮中:对照组饲粮中添加16.5% CP%DM (CTR),对照组饲粮中添加14.5 CP%DM,不添加Actisaf Sc 47 (LCP),对照组饲粮中添加14.5 CP%DM,每头牛/天添加5 g Actisaf Sc 47 (LCPActisaf)。单独或联合Actisaf Sc 47将蛋白质含量从16.5%降低到14.5 CP%DM,显著降低了氮摄入量。至于粪便氮(FN), CTR组和LCP组之间没有差异。但与CTR组相比,LCPActisaf组FN明显降低。与LCP组相比,LCPActisaf组FN有降低的趋势。与CTR相比,尿氮(UN)不受LCP的影响,但LCPActisaf有降低的趋势(p = 0.1)。与CTR和LCP相比,添加Actisaf Sc 47提高了氮素利用效率(NUE) (p < 0.05)。与CTR组相比,LCP组有更高的NUE趋势(p = 0.07)。粗蛋白质消化率在CTR组和LCP组之间基本一致,且有随Actisaf Sc 47添加而增加的趋势。与CTR相比,LCP不影响中性洗涤纤维(NDF)消化率,但LCPActisaf提高了中性洗涤纤维(NDF)消化率(p = 0.05);与LCP相比,LCPActisaf对NDF消化率没有影响。各处理间有机质消化率相似。虽然三组之间瘤胃微生物蛋白合成(RMP)没有差异,但添加Actisaf Sc 47可提高RMP。降低蛋白质含量与Actisaf Sc 47联合使用似乎是一个很好的策略,既可以减少与氮损失相关的环境足迹,又可以增加纤维消化率和瘤胃微生物蛋白质合成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animals
Animals Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
3015
审稿时长
20.52 days
期刊介绍: Animals (ISSN 2076-2615) is an international and interdisciplinary scholarly open access journal. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications, and short notes that are relevant to any field of study that involves animals, including zoology, ethnozoology, animal science, animal ethics and animal welfare. However, preference will be given to those articles that provide an understanding of animals within a larger context (i.e., the animals'' interactions with the outside world, including humans). There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental details and/or method of study, must be provided for research articles. Articles submitted that involve subjecting animals to unnecessary pain or suffering will not be accepted, and all articles must be submitted with the necessary ethical approval (please refer to the Ethical Guidelines for more information).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书