Amputation Risk Prediction Tools for Patients With Diabetic Foot: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Advances in Skin & Wound Care Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-30 DOI:10.1097/ASW.0000000000000451
Yanmei Wang, Cancan Cao, Qianwen Chai, Minghui Lu, Li Wei
{"title":"Amputation Risk Prediction Tools for Patients With Diabetic Foot: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Yanmei Wang, Cancan Cao, Qianwen Chai, Minghui Lu, Li Wei","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically evaluate the research on amputation risk prediction models for patients with diabetic foot.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), and SinoMed were searched for studies on risk prediction tools for amputation in patients with diabetic foot.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Two researchers screened 2134 articles, and 9 met the inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Included study basic information, model construction methods, predictive factors, and model efficacy indicators (AUC, sensitivity, specificity).</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>The 9 studies included in the review described the construction of 15 prediction models and one prediction tool. Eight of the 9 studies had a high overall risk of bias; 2 had poor applicability in the field of predictive factors, and 6 had good applicability in all fields and overall. The main predictive factors included in the models were diabetes duration, glycated hemoglobin, white blood cell count, fibrinogen, and infection. The most common predictive factors were duration of diabetes (odds ratio=2.79; 95% CI: 1.65-3.93), white blood cell count (odds ratio=1.88; 95% CI: 0.78-2.98), and fibrinogen (odds ratio=0.10; 95% CI: 0.06-0.14).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The predictive performance of current amputation risk prediction tools for patients with diabetic foot is good, but the literature has a high risk of bias and needs improved clinical applicability. Researchers should further validate and calibrate the existing tools or develop risk prediction tools with low bias risk and high clinical applicability based on local data.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":" ","pages":"E233-E238"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000451","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To systematically evaluate the research on amputation risk prediction models for patients with diabetic foot.

Data sources: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), and SinoMed were searched for studies on risk prediction tools for amputation in patients with diabetic foot.

Study selection: Two researchers screened 2134 articles, and 9 met the inclusion criteria.

Data extraction: Included study basic information, model construction methods, predictive factors, and model efficacy indicators (AUC, sensitivity, specificity).

Data synthesis: The 9 studies included in the review described the construction of 15 prediction models and one prediction tool. Eight of the 9 studies had a high overall risk of bias; 2 had poor applicability in the field of predictive factors, and 6 had good applicability in all fields and overall. The main predictive factors included in the models were diabetes duration, glycated hemoglobin, white blood cell count, fibrinogen, and infection. The most common predictive factors were duration of diabetes (odds ratio=2.79; 95% CI: 1.65-3.93), white blood cell count (odds ratio=1.88; 95% CI: 0.78-2.98), and fibrinogen (odds ratio=0.10; 95% CI: 0.06-0.14).

Conclusions: The predictive performance of current amputation risk prediction tools for patients with diabetic foot is good, but the literature has a high risk of bias and needs improved clinical applicability. Researchers should further validate and calibrate the existing tools or develop risk prediction tools with low bias risk and high clinical applicability based on local data.

糖尿病足患者截肢风险预测工具:系统综述
目的:对糖尿病足患者截肢风险预测模型的研究进行系统评价。数据来源:检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据库、中国科技期刊库(VIP)、中国医学信息网(sinmed),检索糖尿病足患者截肢风险预测工具的研究。研究选择:两位研究者筛选了2134篇文章,其中9篇符合纳入标准。数据提取:包括研究基本信息、模型构建方法、预测因素、模型疗效指标(AUC、敏感性、特异性)。数据综合:纳入的9项研究共构建了15个预测模型和1个预测工具。9项研究中有8项总体偏倚风险较高;2个在预测因子领域适用性较差,6个在所有领域和整体适用性较好。模型的主要预测因素包括糖尿病病程、糖化血红蛋白、白细胞计数、纤维蛋白原和感染。最常见的预测因素是糖尿病病程(优势比=2.79;95% CI: 1.65-3.93)、白细胞计数(优势比=1.88;95% CI: 0.78-2.98)和纤维蛋白原(优势比=0.10;95% CI: 0.06-0.14)。结论:目前的截肢风险预测工具对糖尿病足患者的预测性能较好,但文献存在较大的偏倚风险,临床适用性有待提高。研究人员应进一步验证和校准现有工具,或根据当地数据开发低偏倚风险和高临床适用性的风险预测工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Skin & Wound Care
Advances in Skin & Wound Care DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
271
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal, Advances in Skin & Wound Care is highly regarded for its unique balance of cutting-edge original research and practical clinical management articles on wounds and other problems of skin integrity. Each issue features CME/CE for physicians and nurses, the first journal in the field to regularly offer continuing education for both disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书