Evaluating Equations for Predicting Enteric Methane Emissions in Dairy Cattle.

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Animals Pub Date : 2026-04-21 DOI:10.3390/ani16081270
Fern T Baker, Luke O'Grady, Martin J Green
{"title":"Evaluating Equations for Predicting Enteric Methane Emissions in Dairy Cattle.","authors":"Fern T Baker, Luke O'Grady, Martin J Green","doi":"10.3390/ani16081270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several prediction equations have been created, based on various dietary composition variables, to predict dairy cattle enteric methane emissions (EMEs). Inconsistencies in measuring EMEs have created difficulties comparing dairy cattle emissions between farms and inhibits certain in efforts to reduce emissions and work towards Net Zero. The aims of the current study were to gather existing EME prediction equations and evaluate the variability in their prediction results. An additional aim was to create a combined prediction equation, based on the dietary components with the highest predictive ability, representing the average prediction across existing equations, which accounted for the variation amongst existing equations. The 32 equations produced large variation in the prediction of EMEs for each of the 15 example diets, ranging from 12.49 to 34.27 g CH<sub>4</sub>/kg DM. To create a combined EME prediction equation, twelve combinations of dietary variables were evaluated using a mixed-effects model. An equation based on metabolised energy (ME) and neutral detergent fibre (NDF) was chosen (methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) = 0.33 × ME + 0.31 × NDF + 3.47), due to the significance of the predictor variables and low prediction error (RMSE = 1.47 g CH<sub>4</sub>/kg DM), with a random-effects residual variance of 2.32. The combined equation may act as a suitable compromise to compare emissions between studies accounting for unexplained variation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7955,"journal":{"name":"Animals","volume":"16 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13113475/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animals","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16081270","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several prediction equations have been created, based on various dietary composition variables, to predict dairy cattle enteric methane emissions (EMEs). Inconsistencies in measuring EMEs have created difficulties comparing dairy cattle emissions between farms and inhibits certain in efforts to reduce emissions and work towards Net Zero. The aims of the current study were to gather existing EME prediction equations and evaluate the variability in their prediction results. An additional aim was to create a combined prediction equation, based on the dietary components with the highest predictive ability, representing the average prediction across existing equations, which accounted for the variation amongst existing equations. The 32 equations produced large variation in the prediction of EMEs for each of the 15 example diets, ranging from 12.49 to 34.27 g CH4/kg DM. To create a combined EME prediction equation, twelve combinations of dietary variables were evaluated using a mixed-effects model. An equation based on metabolised energy (ME) and neutral detergent fibre (NDF) was chosen (methane (CH4) = 0.33 × ME + 0.31 × NDF + 3.47), due to the significance of the predictor variables and low prediction error (RMSE = 1.47 g CH4/kg DM), with a random-effects residual variance of 2.32. The combined equation may act as a suitable compromise to compare emissions between studies accounting for unexplained variation.

预测奶牛肠道甲烷排放的评估方程。
基于不同的膳食成分变量,已经建立了几个预测方程来预测奶牛肠道甲烷排放(EMEs)。测量eme的不一致给比较不同农场的奶牛排放造成了困难,并阻碍了减少排放和实现净零排放的努力。本研究的目的是收集现有的电磁预测方程,并评估其预测结果的变异性。另一个目标是创建一个组合预测方程,基于具有最高预测能力的饮食成分,代表现有方程的平均预测,这解释了现有方程之间的差异。这32个方程对15种样日粮的EME预测差异较大,范围在12.49 ~ 34.27 g CH4/kg DM之间。为了建立组合EME预测方程,使用混合效应模型对12种日粮变量组合进行了评估。考虑到预测变量的显著性和较低的预测误差(RMSE = 1.47 g CH4/kg DM),随机效应残差为2.32,选择基于代谢能(ME)和中性洗涤纤维(NDF)的方程(甲烷(CH4) = 0.33 × ME + 0.31 × NDF + 3.47)。合并后的方程可以作为一个合适的折衷方案,用于比较考虑无法解释的变化的研究之间的排放量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animals
Animals Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
3015
审稿时长
20.52 days
期刊介绍: Animals (ISSN 2076-2615) is an international and interdisciplinary scholarly open access journal. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications, and short notes that are relevant to any field of study that involves animals, including zoology, ethnozoology, animal science, animal ethics and animal welfare. However, preference will be given to those articles that provide an understanding of animals within a larger context (i.e., the animals'' interactions with the outside world, including humans). There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental details and/or method of study, must be provided for research articles. Articles submitted that involve subjecting animals to unnecessary pain or suffering will not be accepted, and all articles must be submitted with the necessary ethical approval (please refer to the Ethical Guidelines for more information).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书