Evaluating Minority Representation in the All of Us Research Program: Progress and Ongoing Challenges.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
American journal of public health Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-30 DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2026.308441
Zhiyu Qian, Mansoo Cho, Hari S Iyer, Stuart R Lipsitz, Alexander P Cole, Kevin Kensler, Quoc-Dien Trinh
{"title":"Evaluating Minority Representation in the All of Us Research Program: Progress and Ongoing Challenges.","authors":"Zhiyu Qian, Mansoo Cho, Hari S Iyer, Stuart R Lipsitz, Alexander P Cole, Kevin Kensler, Quoc-Dien Trinh","doi":"10.2105/AJPH.2026.308441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives.</b> To evaluate trends in racial and ethnic representation in the All of Us (AoU) Research Program from 2017 to 2023 and assess regional disparities relative to US Census benchmarks. <b>Methods.</b> Using the AoU data repository, we compared yearly and cumulative racial/ethnic representation with 2020 US Census data. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to quantify underrepresentation by group, year, region, and sex at birth. <b>Results.</b> Non-Hispanic White individuals accounted for the largest percentage of the 619 830 participants (56.3%), followed by non-Hispanic Blacks (15.9%), Hispanics (14.9%), Asians (3.5%), and individuals in the multiracial/other category (9.4%). Asians and Hispanics were consistently underrepresented. Regional disparities were notable: Asian representation was lowest in the West (OR = 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.47, 0.49), and Hispanic underrepresentation was most pronounced in the South (OR = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.53, 0.55). <b>Conclusions.</b> Persistent underrepresentation of Asian and Hispanic participants highlights ongoing gaps as AoU recruitment continues. Continued efforts toward equitable participation will be important for achieving the scientific and ethical goals of precision medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":7647,"journal":{"name":"American journal of public health","volume":" ","pages":"1339-1342"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2026.308441","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. To evaluate trends in racial and ethnic representation in the All of Us (AoU) Research Program from 2017 to 2023 and assess regional disparities relative to US Census benchmarks. Methods. Using the AoU data repository, we compared yearly and cumulative racial/ethnic representation with 2020 US Census data. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to quantify underrepresentation by group, year, region, and sex at birth. Results. Non-Hispanic White individuals accounted for the largest percentage of the 619 830 participants (56.3%), followed by non-Hispanic Blacks (15.9%), Hispanics (14.9%), Asians (3.5%), and individuals in the multiracial/other category (9.4%). Asians and Hispanics were consistently underrepresented. Regional disparities were notable: Asian representation was lowest in the West (OR = 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.47, 0.49), and Hispanic underrepresentation was most pronounced in the South (OR = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.53, 0.55). Conclusions. Persistent underrepresentation of Asian and Hispanic participants highlights ongoing gaps as AoU recruitment continues. Continued efforts toward equitable participation will be important for achieving the scientific and ethical goals of precision medicine.

评估少数族裔在我们所有人研究项目中的代表性:进展和持续的挑战。
目标。评估2017年至2023年我们所有人(AoU)研究计划中种族和民族代表性的趋势,并评估相对于美国人口普查基准的地区差异。方法。使用AoU数据存储库,我们将年度和累计种族/民族代表性与2020年美国人口普查数据进行了比较。计算比值比(ORs),按出生组、年份、地区和性别量化代表性不足。结果。在619830名参与者中,非西班牙裔白人占最大比例(56.3%),其次是非西班牙裔黑人(15.9%)、西班牙裔(14.9%)、亚洲人(3.5%)和多种族/其他类别的个人(9.4%)。亚裔和西班牙裔一直被低估。地区差异是显著的:亚洲人在西部的代表性最低(OR = 0.48; 95%可信区间[CI] = 0.47, 0.49),西班牙裔代表性不足在南部最为明显(OR = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.53, 0.55)。结论。亚洲和西班牙裔参与者的持续代表性不足凸显了AoU招聘持续存在的差距。继续努力争取公平参与对于实现精准医学的科学和伦理目标将是重要的。公共卫生。2026年4月30日在线出版:e1-e4。https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2026.308441)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of public health
American journal of public health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1109
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Public Health (AJPH) is dedicated to publishing original work in research, research methods, and program evaluation within the field of public health. The journal's mission is to advance public health research, policy, practice, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书