{"title":"How factor digitalization shapes urban carbon TFP: mechanisms, thresholds, and spillovers in Chinese cities","authors":"Bao-jun Tang, Jun-yu Chen, Chang-Jing Ji","doi":"10.1186/s13021-026-00448-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Digitalization and decarbonization are reshaping urban production, yet the relationship between factor-level digitalization and cities’ carbon total factor productivity (CTFP) remains underexplored, particularly concerning its mechanisms, boundary conditions, and spatial reach. This study develops a Digitalization Index of Urban Elements (DIUE), encompassing labor, capital, and energy, to examine its association with CTFP in 213 Chinese cities from 2011 to 2023. CTFP is measured using an undesirable-output slacks-based measure, and the empirical analysis employs a two-step system GMM with Windmeijer correction, mediation analysis, spatial-lag models, and dynamic panel threshold tests. Robustness checks utilize an alternative productivity index and a difference-in-differences design based on early smart-city pilots. Three key findings emerge. First, factor-level digitalization is positively associated with urban CTFP; a one-standard-deviation increase in DIUE corresponds to a 1.5–1.7% increase in CTFP, which accumulates to approximately 4% in the long run. Second, this relationship is primarily mediated by green innovation, accounting for approximately 47% of the mediated effect, while industrial upgrading and agglomeration provide additional support, accounting for about 24% and 6%, respectively. Third, the benefits of digitalization exhibit both spatial spillovers and conditional effects: the indirect spillover effect constitutes roughly one-third of the direct effect, and positive gains are more pronounced in contexts with lower labor and capital misallocation and stronger local low-carbon commitment. By integrating a transparent and replicable measure of factor digitalization with evidence on its underlying mechanisms, spatial spillovers, and activation thresholds, this study clarifies the conditions under which digitalization can be effectively translated into enhanced carbon productivity. The policy implication is that cities should complement digital investment with measures to reduce factor misallocation, strengthen low-carbon commitment, and foster innovation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":505,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Balance and Management","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s13021-026-00448-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Balance and Management","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13021-026-00448-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Digitalization and decarbonization are reshaping urban production, yet the relationship between factor-level digitalization and cities’ carbon total factor productivity (CTFP) remains underexplored, particularly concerning its mechanisms, boundary conditions, and spatial reach. This study develops a Digitalization Index of Urban Elements (DIUE), encompassing labor, capital, and energy, to examine its association with CTFP in 213 Chinese cities from 2011 to 2023. CTFP is measured using an undesirable-output slacks-based measure, and the empirical analysis employs a two-step system GMM with Windmeijer correction, mediation analysis, spatial-lag models, and dynamic panel threshold tests. Robustness checks utilize an alternative productivity index and a difference-in-differences design based on early smart-city pilots. Three key findings emerge. First, factor-level digitalization is positively associated with urban CTFP; a one-standard-deviation increase in DIUE corresponds to a 1.5–1.7% increase in CTFP, which accumulates to approximately 4% in the long run. Second, this relationship is primarily mediated by green innovation, accounting for approximately 47% of the mediated effect, while industrial upgrading and agglomeration provide additional support, accounting for about 24% and 6%, respectively. Third, the benefits of digitalization exhibit both spatial spillovers and conditional effects: the indirect spillover effect constitutes roughly one-third of the direct effect, and positive gains are more pronounced in contexts with lower labor and capital misallocation and stronger local low-carbon commitment. By integrating a transparent and replicable measure of factor digitalization with evidence on its underlying mechanisms, spatial spillovers, and activation thresholds, this study clarifies the conditions under which digitalization can be effectively translated into enhanced carbon productivity. The policy implication is that cities should complement digital investment with measures to reduce factor misallocation, strengthen low-carbon commitment, and foster innovation.
期刊介绍:
Carbon Balance and Management is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of research aimed at developing a comprehensive policy relevant to the understanding of the global carbon cycle.
The global carbon cycle involves important couplings between climate, atmospheric CO2 and the terrestrial and oceanic biospheres. The current transformation of the carbon cycle due to changes in climate and atmospheric composition is widely recognized as potentially dangerous for the biosphere and for the well-being of humankind, and therefore monitoring, understanding and predicting the evolution of the carbon cycle in the context of the whole biosphere (both terrestrial and marine) is a challenge to the scientific community.
This demands interdisciplinary research and new approaches for studying geographical and temporal distributions of carbon pools and fluxes, control and feedback mechanisms of the carbon-climate system, points of intervention and windows of opportunity for managing the carbon-climate-human system.
Carbon Balance and Management is a medium for researchers in the field to convey the results of their research across disciplinary boundaries. Through this dissemination of research, the journal aims to support the work of the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) and to provide governmental and non-governmental organizations with instantaneous access to continually emerging knowledge, including paradigm shifts and consensual views.