Oocyte–cumulus cell interaction: a key factor in early embryo development

IF 10.9 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Biological Reviews Pub Date : 2026-09-03 Epub Date: 2026-05-04 DOI:10.1002/brv.70177
Marc Torres-Garrido, Marc Yeste, Yentel Mateo-Otero
{"title":"Oocyte–cumulus cell interaction: a key factor in early embryo development","authors":"Marc Torres-Garrido,&nbsp;Marc Yeste,&nbsp;Yentel Mateo-Otero","doi":"10.1002/brv.70177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The evaluation of oocyte competence is a fundamental step in achieving successful outcomes following assisted reproduction techniques (ART). At present, however, conventional oocyte maturation assessment is carried out by morphological observation, which is a subjective method that does not consider molecular features. For this reason, many authors have proposed cumulus cells (CCs) as biomarkers for oocyte quality, mainly due to their role in the modulation of the physiology and competence of the female gamete. This review summarises our current understanding of the influence of CCs on oocyte physiology and also on the first stages of embryo development. Thus, it includes studies carried out in mammalian species evaluating DNA integrity, viability, gene expression, and profiles of the metabolome and proteome in CCs. While previous research has proposed different CC molecules and features as biomarkers of oocyte functionality and competence, data are, in some cases, inconsistent. For instance, contradictory data have been published regarding the impact of DNA fragmentation, mitochondrial DNA content, or apoptosis in CCs on oocyte maturation and embryo development. On the other hand, looking into gene expression profiles in CCs may reflect oocyte quality, as the expression of several transcripts has been positively associated with oocyte growth and embryo development. Finally, we also point out areas in which more research should be carried out, as is the case for proteomics, telomere length, and metabolomics. This review discusses the most relevant findings not only to better understand the existing relationship between cell types but also to pinpoint the most promising characteristics that could be used as biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":"101 5","pages":"2265-2278"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/brv.70177","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brv.70177","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The evaluation of oocyte competence is a fundamental step in achieving successful outcomes following assisted reproduction techniques (ART). At present, however, conventional oocyte maturation assessment is carried out by morphological observation, which is a subjective method that does not consider molecular features. For this reason, many authors have proposed cumulus cells (CCs) as biomarkers for oocyte quality, mainly due to their role in the modulation of the physiology and competence of the female gamete. This review summarises our current understanding of the influence of CCs on oocyte physiology and also on the first stages of embryo development. Thus, it includes studies carried out in mammalian species evaluating DNA integrity, viability, gene expression, and profiles of the metabolome and proteome in CCs. While previous research has proposed different CC molecules and features as biomarkers of oocyte functionality and competence, data are, in some cases, inconsistent. For instance, contradictory data have been published regarding the impact of DNA fragmentation, mitochondrial DNA content, or apoptosis in CCs on oocyte maturation and embryo development. On the other hand, looking into gene expression profiles in CCs may reflect oocyte quality, as the expression of several transcripts has been positively associated with oocyte growth and embryo development. Finally, we also point out areas in which more research should be carried out, as is the case for proteomics, telomere length, and metabolomics. This review discusses the most relevant findings not only to better understand the existing relationship between cell types but also to pinpoint the most promising characteristics that could be used as biomarkers.

卵丘细胞相互作用:早期胚胎发育的关键因素。
卵母细胞能力的评估是辅助生殖技术(ART)取得成功的基本步骤。然而,目前传统的卵母细胞成熟评估是通过形态学观察进行的,这是一种主观的方法,没有考虑分子特征。因此,许多作者提出将卵丘细胞(CCs)作为卵母细胞质量的生物标志物,主要是因为它们在调节雌性配子的生理和能力方面的作用。这篇综述总结了我们目前对卵母细胞生理和胚胎发育第一阶段的影响的理解。因此,它包括在哺乳动物物种中进行的研究,评估DNA完整性、生存能力、基因表达以及cc中代谢组和蛋白质组的概况。虽然先前的研究提出了不同的CC分子和特征作为卵母细胞功能和能力的生物标志物,但在某些情况下,数据不一致。例如,关于DNA片段化、线粒体DNA含量或细胞凋亡对卵母细胞成熟和胚胎发育的影响,已经发表了相互矛盾的数据。另一方面,研究cc中的基因表达谱可能反映卵母细胞的质量,因为一些转录本的表达与卵母细胞生长和胚胎发育呈正相关。最后,我们还指出了应该开展更多研究的领域,如蛋白质组学、端粒长度和代谢组学。这篇综述讨论了最相关的发现,不仅是为了更好地理解细胞类型之间的现有关系,而且是为了确定最有希望用作生物标志物的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Reviews
Biological Reviews 生物-生物学
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly. The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions. The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field. Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书