Marc Torres-Garrido, Marc Yeste, Yentel Mateo-Otero
{"title":"Oocyte–cumulus cell interaction: a key factor in early embryo development","authors":"Marc Torres-Garrido, Marc Yeste, Yentel Mateo-Otero","doi":"10.1002/brv.70177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The evaluation of oocyte competence is a fundamental step in achieving successful outcomes following assisted reproduction techniques (ART). At present, however, conventional oocyte maturation assessment is carried out by morphological observation, which is a subjective method that does not consider molecular features. For this reason, many authors have proposed cumulus cells (CCs) as biomarkers for oocyte quality, mainly due to their role in the modulation of the physiology and competence of the female gamete. This review summarises our current understanding of the influence of CCs on oocyte physiology and also on the first stages of embryo development. Thus, it includes studies carried out in mammalian species evaluating DNA integrity, viability, gene expression, and profiles of the metabolome and proteome in CCs. While previous research has proposed different CC molecules and features as biomarkers of oocyte functionality and competence, data are, in some cases, inconsistent. For instance, contradictory data have been published regarding the impact of DNA fragmentation, mitochondrial DNA content, or apoptosis in CCs on oocyte maturation and embryo development. On the other hand, looking into gene expression profiles in CCs may reflect oocyte quality, as the expression of several transcripts has been positively associated with oocyte growth and embryo development. Finally, we also point out areas in which more research should be carried out, as is the case for proteomics, telomere length, and metabolomics. This review discusses the most relevant findings not only to better understand the existing relationship between cell types but also to pinpoint the most promising characteristics that could be used as biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":"101 5","pages":"2265-2278"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/brv.70177","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brv.70177","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The evaluation of oocyte competence is a fundamental step in achieving successful outcomes following assisted reproduction techniques (ART). At present, however, conventional oocyte maturation assessment is carried out by morphological observation, which is a subjective method that does not consider molecular features. For this reason, many authors have proposed cumulus cells (CCs) as biomarkers for oocyte quality, mainly due to their role in the modulation of the physiology and competence of the female gamete. This review summarises our current understanding of the influence of CCs on oocyte physiology and also on the first stages of embryo development. Thus, it includes studies carried out in mammalian species evaluating DNA integrity, viability, gene expression, and profiles of the metabolome and proteome in CCs. While previous research has proposed different CC molecules and features as biomarkers of oocyte functionality and competence, data are, in some cases, inconsistent. For instance, contradictory data have been published regarding the impact of DNA fragmentation, mitochondrial DNA content, or apoptosis in CCs on oocyte maturation and embryo development. On the other hand, looking into gene expression profiles in CCs may reflect oocyte quality, as the expression of several transcripts has been positively associated with oocyte growth and embryo development. Finally, we also point out areas in which more research should be carried out, as is the case for proteomics, telomere length, and metabolomics. This review discusses the most relevant findings not only to better understand the existing relationship between cell types but also to pinpoint the most promising characteristics that could be used as biomarkers.
期刊介绍:
Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly.
The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions.
The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field.
Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.