Integrating Multidisciplinary Reviews of Fatalities Into a High-Performing Air Ambulance Service

Q3 Nursing
Air Medical Journal Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.amj.2026.02.011
Jessica Froggatt MBBS , Benjamin Swift FRCPath , Gareth Grier FRCEM
{"title":"Integrating Multidisciplinary Reviews of Fatalities Into a High-Performing Air Ambulance Service","authors":"Jessica Froggatt MBBS ,&nbsp;Benjamin Swift FRCPath ,&nbsp;Gareth Grier FRCEM","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2026.02.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Advanced prehospital care delivered by air ambulance services in the United Kingdom aims to reduce preventable trauma deaths by bringing hospital-level interventions directly to patients. Despite these efforts, a significant proportion of patients still die in the immediate phase, and current learning frameworks focus predominantly on identifying errors rather than examining all fatalities for system-wide improvements.</div><div>This paper explores the potential of integrating multidisciplinary approaches, particularly clinicopathological correlation (CPC) meetings, into high-performing air ambulance services to enhance learning from every death. By including autopsy pathologists alongside clinicians, CPC meetings provide a robust platform to correlate prehospital findings with definitive postmortem results, improving diagnostic accuracy, clinical reasoning, and professional development. They also foster interprofessional collaboration, support clinician well-being by providing closure, and strengthen patient safety through contextualized learning beyond fault finding.</div><div>Barriers include limited data sharing, coronial processes, and inconsistent governance across independent air ambulance services. However, the successful implementation of CPC multidisciplinary team meetings demonstrates significant educational and systemic benefits, driving innovation, and quality assurance. We propose that all high-performing air ambulance services should adopt structured, regular CPC meetings with pathologist involvement, thereby embedding learning from every fatality as a cornerstone of governance, resilience, and future improvements in care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"45 3","pages":"Pages 159-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X26000556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advanced prehospital care delivered by air ambulance services in the United Kingdom aims to reduce preventable trauma deaths by bringing hospital-level interventions directly to patients. Despite these efforts, a significant proportion of patients still die in the immediate phase, and current learning frameworks focus predominantly on identifying errors rather than examining all fatalities for system-wide improvements.
This paper explores the potential of integrating multidisciplinary approaches, particularly clinicopathological correlation (CPC) meetings, into high-performing air ambulance services to enhance learning from every death. By including autopsy pathologists alongside clinicians, CPC meetings provide a robust platform to correlate prehospital findings with definitive postmortem results, improving diagnostic accuracy, clinical reasoning, and professional development. They also foster interprofessional collaboration, support clinician well-being by providing closure, and strengthen patient safety through contextualized learning beyond fault finding.
Barriers include limited data sharing, coronial processes, and inconsistent governance across independent air ambulance services. However, the successful implementation of CPC multidisciplinary team meetings demonstrates significant educational and systemic benefits, driving innovation, and quality assurance. We propose that all high-performing air ambulance services should adopt structured, regular CPC meetings with pathologist involvement, thereby embedding learning from every fatality as a cornerstone of governance, resilience, and future improvements in care.
将多学科的死亡评估整合到高效的空中救护服务中
联合王国空中救护服务提供的先进院前护理旨在通过直接向患者提供医院一级的干预措施来减少可预防的创伤死亡。尽管做出了这些努力,但仍有很大比例的患者立即死亡,目前的学习框架主要侧重于识别错误,而不是检查所有死亡病例以进行全系统改进。本文探讨了将多学科方法,特别是临床病理相关性(CPC)会议,整合到高性能空中救护服务中的潜力,以加强从每个死亡中学习。通过包括尸检病理学家和临床医生,CPC会议提供了一个强大的平台,将院前发现与明确的死后结果联系起来,提高诊断准确性、临床推理和专业发展。他们还促进跨专业合作,通过提供封闭来支持临床医生的福祉,并通过情境化学习而不是寻找错误来加强患者的安全。障碍包括有限的数据共享、加冕程序和独立空中救护服务之间不一致的治理。然而,CPC多学科团队会议的成功实施显示了显著的教育和系统效益,推动了创新和质量保证。我们建议,所有高绩效的空中救护服务都应采用有组织的、定期的CPC会议,病理学家参与其中,从而将从每一起死亡事件中学习作为治理、复原力和未来护理改进的基石。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Air Medical Journal
Air Medical Journal Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Air Medical Journal is the official journal of the five leading air medical transport associations in the United States. AMJ is the premier provider of information for the medical transport industry, addressing the unique concerns of medical transport physicians, nurses, pilots, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, communication specialists, and program administrators. The journal contains practical how-to articles, debates on controversial industry issues, legislative updates, case studies, and peer-reviewed original research articles covering all aspects of the medical transport profession.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书