Experience With Electrostatic Discharge During Hoist Operations in the Norwegian Search-and-Rescue Helicopter Service: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study

Q3 Nursing
Air Medical Journal Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-09 DOI:10.1016/j.amj.2026.01.007
Jostein Rødseth Brede MD, PhD , Arnfinn Storli BSc , Stein Bastian von Tangen-Jordan BSc , Lasse Coucheron BSc
{"title":"Experience With Electrostatic Discharge During Hoist Operations in the Norwegian Search-and-Rescue Helicopter Service: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Jostein Rødseth Brede MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Arnfinn Storli BSc ,&nbsp;Stein Bastian von Tangen-Jordan BSc ,&nbsp;Lasse Coucheron BSc","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2026.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Electrostatic charging during helicopter flight is well known. In a helicopter search-and-rescue (SAR) service, a winch is often used to access or extract patients. To avoid injury to the personnel who are hoisted, electrostatic discharge between the helicopter and the ground should be transferred through an electrostatic discharge line. Still, rescue paramedics (RPs) and physicians involved in hoist operations are familiar with electrostatic discharge episodes, so-called “static.” There is a surprising lack in medical literature that describes the scope of static. We aimed to investigate the experience with electrostatic discharge during hoist operations among the personnel in the Norwegian SAR service.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A nationwide, de-identified, web-based cross-sectional survey. All RPs and physicians who work in the SAR service operated by the 330 Squadron in Norway were invited to participate.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 81 invited, 74 responded (91%). The mean length of experience was 13 years (range, 2-31), and all RPs and 73% of physicians had experienced static. The median number of static experienced was 10 (range, 1–200). Mild static had been experienced by 85%, moderate static by 61%, and severe static by 23%. RPs were both significantly more experienced than physicians and had experienced more static, with a higher degree of severity. Notably, 30% of participants answered that static is a problem for the SAR service, and 24% of participants were worried about potential long-term effects.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this nationwide survey, we found that experience with electrostatic discharge, “static,” is common among personnel involved in hoist operations in the Norwegian SAR service. Many participants had experienced a severe degree of static, and 24% of participants were concerned about long-term effects. This survey establishes a need to further assess the scope and implications of static in the SAR service.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"45 3","pages":"Pages 213-217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X26000167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Electrostatic charging during helicopter flight is well known. In a helicopter search-and-rescue (SAR) service, a winch is often used to access or extract patients. To avoid injury to the personnel who are hoisted, electrostatic discharge between the helicopter and the ground should be transferred through an electrostatic discharge line. Still, rescue paramedics (RPs) and physicians involved in hoist operations are familiar with electrostatic discharge episodes, so-called “static.” There is a surprising lack in medical literature that describes the scope of static. We aimed to investigate the experience with electrostatic discharge during hoist operations among the personnel in the Norwegian SAR service.

Methods

A nationwide, de-identified, web-based cross-sectional survey. All RPs and physicians who work in the SAR service operated by the 330 Squadron in Norway were invited to participate.

Results

Of 81 invited, 74 responded (91%). The mean length of experience was 13 years (range, 2-31), and all RPs and 73% of physicians had experienced static. The median number of static experienced was 10 (range, 1–200). Mild static had been experienced by 85%, moderate static by 61%, and severe static by 23%. RPs were both significantly more experienced than physicians and had experienced more static, with a higher degree of severity. Notably, 30% of participants answered that static is a problem for the SAR service, and 24% of participants were worried about potential long-term effects.

Conclusion

In this nationwide survey, we found that experience with electrostatic discharge, “static,” is common among personnel involved in hoist operations in the Norwegian SAR service. Many participants had experienced a severe degree of static, and 24% of participants were concerned about long-term effects. This survey establishes a need to further assess the scope and implications of static in the SAR service.
挪威搜救直升机服务提升机操作中静电放电的经验:一项全国性的横断面研究
目的探讨直升机飞行过程中的静电充电问题。在直升机搜救(SAR)服务中,绞车经常用于接近或救出病人。为避免对被吊人员造成伤害,直升机与地面之间的静电放电应通过静电放电线传导。尽管如此,参与起重机操作的救援护理人员(rp)和医生都熟悉静电放电事件,即所谓的“静电”。令人惊讶的是,医学文献中缺乏对静态范围的描述。我们的目的是调查挪威搜救服务人员在提升机操作过程中静电放电的经验。方法一项全国性的、去识别的、基于网络的横断面调查。所有在挪威330中队的搜救服务中工作的rp和医生都被邀请参加。结果81人受邀,74人回复,占91%。平均经验长度为13年(范围2-31年),所有rp和73%的医生都经历过静态。静态体验的中位数为10(范围1-200)。85%的人经历过轻度静电,61%的人经历过中度静电,23%的人经历过严重静电。rp都明显比医生更有经验,并且经历了更多的静态,严重程度更高。值得注意的是,30%的参与者回答说静电是SAR服务的一个问题,24%的参与者担心潜在的长期影响。在这项全国性的调查中,我们发现在挪威SAR服务中,参与起重机操作的人员中,静电放电(“static”)的经验很普遍。许多参与者经历了严重程度的静态,24%的参与者担心长期影响。这项调查表明需要进一步评估SAR服务中静态的范围和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Air Medical Journal
Air Medical Journal Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Air Medical Journal is the official journal of the five leading air medical transport associations in the United States. AMJ is the premier provider of information for the medical transport industry, addressing the unique concerns of medical transport physicians, nurses, pilots, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, communication specialists, and program administrators. The journal contains practical how-to articles, debates on controversial industry issues, legislative updates, case studies, and peer-reviewed original research articles covering all aspects of the medical transport profession.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书