Effects of different hyrax maxillary expansion protocols compared with novel magnetic expansion on the pharyngeal airway and maxillary sinus spaces: A retrospective CBCT-based observational study

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
American Journal of Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-23 DOI:10.1016/j.amjoto.2026.104844
Ahmed Lotf Algahefi , Maged S. Alhammadi , Zhihua Li , Fei Tong
{"title":"Effects of different hyrax maxillary expansion protocols compared with novel magnetic expansion on the pharyngeal airway and maxillary sinus spaces: A retrospective CBCT-based observational study","authors":"Ahmed Lotf Algahefi ,&nbsp;Maged S. Alhammadi ,&nbsp;Zhihua Li ,&nbsp;Fei Tong","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2026.104844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate three-dimensional changes in the maxillary sinus (MS) and pharyngeal airway space (PAS) following rapid (RME), slow (SME), and magnetic maxillary expansion (MME) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective observational study included 60 patients (35 males, 25 females; mean age 12.83 ± 0.92 years) with transverse maxillary deficiency, allocated equally to RME, SME, and MME groups (<em>n</em> = 20 each). Expansion was carried out according to protocol-specific activation schedules, with appliances retained for three months post-expansion. CBCT scans were obtained at baseline (T1), post-expansion (T2), and after retention (T3). Measurements of MS volume, area, minimum constriction area, and PAS subdivisions (nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx) were analyzed using Dolphin Imaging software. An adjusted <em>p</em>-value of &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All three expansion protocols demonstrated numerical increases in maxillary sinus and pharyngeal airway dimensions during the active expansion phase (T1–T2); however, after adjustment for multiple comparisons, statistically significant changes were limited. Significant within-group increases in maxillary sinus volume were observed only in the slow maxillary expansion group, while no pharyngeal airway parameter showed a statistically significant change after correction. No significant dimensional changes were detected during the retention period (T2-T3). Inter-group comparisons revealed no statistically significant differences among the three expansion protocols.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Magnetic maxillary expansion demonstrates anatomical effects comparable to conventional expansion protocols; importantly, no distinct or superior pharyngeal airway benefit was identified, highlighting the limits of airway-related effects of maxillary expansion rather than evidence of enhanced functional respiratory impact.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"47 3","pages":"Article 104844"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070926000591","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate three-dimensional changes in the maxillary sinus (MS) and pharyngeal airway space (PAS) following rapid (RME), slow (SME), and magnetic maxillary expansion (MME) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Methods

This retrospective observational study included 60 patients (35 males, 25 females; mean age 12.83 ± 0.92 years) with transverse maxillary deficiency, allocated equally to RME, SME, and MME groups (n = 20 each). Expansion was carried out according to protocol-specific activation schedules, with appliances retained for three months post-expansion. CBCT scans were obtained at baseline (T1), post-expansion (T2), and after retention (T3). Measurements of MS volume, area, minimum constriction area, and PAS subdivisions (nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx) were analyzed using Dolphin Imaging software. An adjusted p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

All three expansion protocols demonstrated numerical increases in maxillary sinus and pharyngeal airway dimensions during the active expansion phase (T1–T2); however, after adjustment for multiple comparisons, statistically significant changes were limited. Significant within-group increases in maxillary sinus volume were observed only in the slow maxillary expansion group, while no pharyngeal airway parameter showed a statistically significant change after correction. No significant dimensional changes were detected during the retention period (T2-T3). Inter-group comparisons revealed no statistically significant differences among the three expansion protocols.

Conclusion

Magnetic maxillary expansion demonstrates anatomical effects comparable to conventional expansion protocols; importantly, no distinct or superior pharyngeal airway benefit was identified, highlighting the limits of airway-related effects of maxillary expansion rather than evidence of enhanced functional respiratory impact.
不同上颌扩张方案与新型磁扩张方案对咽气道和上颌窦间隙的影响:一项基于cbct的回顾性观察研究
目的应用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评价上颌窦快速扩张(RME)、缓慢扩张(SME)和磁性扩张(MME)后上颌窦(MS)和咽气道间隙(PAS)的三维变化。方法回顾性观察60例上颌横向缺损患者(男35例,女25例,平均年龄12.83±0.92岁),随机分为RME组、SME组、MME组各20例。根据协议特定的激活时间表进行扩展,设备在扩展后保留三个月。分别在基线(T1)、扩张后(T2)和保留后(T3)进行CBCT扫描。使用Dolphin Imaging软件分析MS体积、面积、最小收缩面积和PAS细分(鼻咽部、口咽部、下咽)。校正p值为<;0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果所有三种扩张方案均显示上颌窦和咽气道尺寸在扩张活动期(T1-T2)数值增加;然而,经过多次比较调整后,统计上显著的变化是有限的。只有上颌缓慢扩张组上颌窦体积组内明显增加,而校正后咽气道参数无统计学意义变化。在保留期(T2-T3)未检测到显著的尺寸变化。组间比较显示三种扩展方案间无统计学差异。结论磁性上颌扩张术具有与常规扩张术相当的解剖学效果;重要的是,没有发现明显或优越的咽气道益处,突出了上颌扩张对气道相关影响的局限性,而不是增强功能性呼吸影响的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Otolaryngology
American Journal of Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书