Effects of different hyrax maxillary expansion protocols compared with novel magnetic expansion on the pharyngeal airway and maxillary sinus spaces: A retrospective CBCT-based observational study
Ahmed Lotf Algahefi , Maged S. Alhammadi , Zhihua Li , Fei Tong
{"title":"Effects of different hyrax maxillary expansion protocols compared with novel magnetic expansion on the pharyngeal airway and maxillary sinus spaces: A retrospective CBCT-based observational study","authors":"Ahmed Lotf Algahefi , Maged S. Alhammadi , Zhihua Li , Fei Tong","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2026.104844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate three-dimensional changes in the maxillary sinus (MS) and pharyngeal airway space (PAS) following rapid (RME), slow (SME), and magnetic maxillary expansion (MME) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective observational study included 60 patients (35 males, 25 females; mean age 12.83 ± 0.92 years) with transverse maxillary deficiency, allocated equally to RME, SME, and MME groups (<em>n</em> = 20 each). Expansion was carried out according to protocol-specific activation schedules, with appliances retained for three months post-expansion. CBCT scans were obtained at baseline (T1), post-expansion (T2), and after retention (T3). Measurements of MS volume, area, minimum constriction area, and PAS subdivisions (nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx) were analyzed using Dolphin Imaging software. An adjusted <em>p</em>-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All three expansion protocols demonstrated numerical increases in maxillary sinus and pharyngeal airway dimensions during the active expansion phase (T1–T2); however, after adjustment for multiple comparisons, statistically significant changes were limited. Significant within-group increases in maxillary sinus volume were observed only in the slow maxillary expansion group, while no pharyngeal airway parameter showed a statistically significant change after correction. No significant dimensional changes were detected during the retention period (T2-T3). Inter-group comparisons revealed no statistically significant differences among the three expansion protocols.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Magnetic maxillary expansion demonstrates anatomical effects comparable to conventional expansion protocols; importantly, no distinct or superior pharyngeal airway benefit was identified, highlighting the limits of airway-related effects of maxillary expansion rather than evidence of enhanced functional respiratory impact.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"47 3","pages":"Article 104844"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070926000591","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate three-dimensional changes in the maxillary sinus (MS) and pharyngeal airway space (PAS) following rapid (RME), slow (SME), and magnetic maxillary expansion (MME) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Methods
This retrospective observational study included 60 patients (35 males, 25 females; mean age 12.83 ± 0.92 years) with transverse maxillary deficiency, allocated equally to RME, SME, and MME groups (n = 20 each). Expansion was carried out according to protocol-specific activation schedules, with appliances retained for three months post-expansion. CBCT scans were obtained at baseline (T1), post-expansion (T2), and after retention (T3). Measurements of MS volume, area, minimum constriction area, and PAS subdivisions (nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx) were analyzed using Dolphin Imaging software. An adjusted p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
All three expansion protocols demonstrated numerical increases in maxillary sinus and pharyngeal airway dimensions during the active expansion phase (T1–T2); however, after adjustment for multiple comparisons, statistically significant changes were limited. Significant within-group increases in maxillary sinus volume were observed only in the slow maxillary expansion group, while no pharyngeal airway parameter showed a statistically significant change after correction. No significant dimensional changes were detected during the retention period (T2-T3). Inter-group comparisons revealed no statistically significant differences among the three expansion protocols.
Conclusion
Magnetic maxillary expansion demonstrates anatomical effects comparable to conventional expansion protocols; importantly, no distinct or superior pharyngeal airway benefit was identified, highlighting the limits of airway-related effects of maxillary expansion rather than evidence of enhanced functional respiratory impact.
期刊介绍:
Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.