Multi-criteria integrated assessment framework and GIS applied to fusion power plant site selection considering infrastructure-related data at a European scale

IF 12.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Energy Strategy Reviews Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-29 DOI:10.1016/j.esr.2026.102241
Larissa Breuning , Martín Oviedo Pascottini , Albrecht Herrmann , Frédérick Bordry , Thomas Hamacher
{"title":"Multi-criteria integrated assessment framework and GIS applied to fusion power plant site selection considering infrastructure-related data at a European scale","authors":"Larissa Breuning ,&nbsp;Martín Oviedo Pascottini ,&nbsp;Albrecht Herrmann ,&nbsp;Frédérick Bordry ,&nbsp;Thomas Hamacher","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2026.102241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Electricity is essential to human quality of life and should be generated in a sustainable, low-carbon, and environmentally responsible way to meet global demand. Nuclear fusion offers a clean energy opportunity to meet future energy needs. Recently, there has been increased interest from states and commercial companies in building an energy-supplying fusion power plant. In addition to the technical challenge, an appropriate choice of the site is necessary. This study examines possible sites by applying a multi-criteria integrated assessment to evaluate sites for a 1GW<sub>el</sub> fusion power plant unit, in terms of infrastructure-related information and georeferenced datasets at a European scale. This enables well-founded decisions on potential sites and serves as the basis for the subsequent licensing of a fusion power plant. The paper presents a geographic information system (GIS)-based multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) for site selection. Seven exclusionary and nine discretionary criteria, organized into categories, are identified and applied in a two-stage decision-making process. Exclusionary criteria categories include the existence and sufficiency of cooling water, suitability of seismological conditions, environmental sensitivity, and land use. Discretionary criteria categories include electrical power infrastructure, natural conditions, and socio-economic infrastructure. Sensitivity analyses assess the impact of varying criteria and criterion weightings on the preferred candidate sites. Furthermore, the framework was benchmarked using sites from real fusion projects and previous studies. In the different cases, 0.04-0.15% of the European area is classified as “Highest preference” and 0.21-0.48% as “High preference”.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 102241"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X26002075","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electricity is essential to human quality of life and should be generated in a sustainable, low-carbon, and environmentally responsible way to meet global demand. Nuclear fusion offers a clean energy opportunity to meet future energy needs. Recently, there has been increased interest from states and commercial companies in building an energy-supplying fusion power plant. In addition to the technical challenge, an appropriate choice of the site is necessary. This study examines possible sites by applying a multi-criteria integrated assessment to evaluate sites for a 1GWel fusion power plant unit, in terms of infrastructure-related information and georeferenced datasets at a European scale. This enables well-founded decisions on potential sites and serves as the basis for the subsequent licensing of a fusion power plant. The paper presents a geographic information system (GIS)-based multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) for site selection. Seven exclusionary and nine discretionary criteria, organized into categories, are identified and applied in a two-stage decision-making process. Exclusionary criteria categories include the existence and sufficiency of cooling water, suitability of seismological conditions, environmental sensitivity, and land use. Discretionary criteria categories include electrical power infrastructure, natural conditions, and socio-economic infrastructure. Sensitivity analyses assess the impact of varying criteria and criterion weightings on the preferred candidate sites. Furthermore, the framework was benchmarked using sites from real fusion projects and previous studies. In the different cases, 0.04-0.15% of the European area is classified as “Highest preference” and 0.21-0.48% as “High preference”.
多准则综合评估框架和GIS应用于融合电厂选址,考虑欧洲规模的基础设施相关数据
电力对人类生活质量至关重要,应以可持续、低碳和对环境负责的方式发电,以满足全球需求。核聚变为满足未来的能源需求提供了一个清洁能源的机会。最近,各州和商业公司对建造能源供应核聚变发电厂的兴趣越来越大。除了技术上的挑战,合适的场地选择也是必要的。本研究根据欧洲规模的基础设施相关信息和地理参考数据集,通过应用多标准综合评估来评估1GWel聚变发电厂单元的地点,从而考察了可能的地点。这使得对潜在地点做出有充分根据的决定,并为随后核聚变发电厂的许可提供基础。提出了一种基于地理信息系统(GIS)的多准则决策分析(MCDA)选址方法。七项排除性标准和九项自由裁量性标准按类别加以确定,并在两阶段决策过程中加以应用。排除标准类别包括冷却水的存在和充足性、地震条件的适宜性、环境敏感性和土地利用。自由裁量标准类别包括电力基础设施、自然条件和社会经济基础设施。敏感性分析评估不同标准和标准权重对首选候选地点的影响。此外,使用真实融合项目和先前研究的站点对该框架进行基准测试。在不同的情况下,0.04-0.15%的欧洲地区被列为“最高优先”,0.21-0.48%被列为“高度优先”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书