Multi-criteria integrated assessment framework and GIS applied to fusion power plant site selection considering infrastructure-related data at a European scale
Larissa Breuning , Martín Oviedo Pascottini , Albrecht Herrmann , Frédérick Bordry , Thomas Hamacher
{"title":"Multi-criteria integrated assessment framework and GIS applied to fusion power plant site selection considering infrastructure-related data at a European scale","authors":"Larissa Breuning , Martín Oviedo Pascottini , Albrecht Herrmann , Frédérick Bordry , Thomas Hamacher","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2026.102241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Electricity is essential to human quality of life and should be generated in a sustainable, low-carbon, and environmentally responsible way to meet global demand. Nuclear fusion offers a clean energy opportunity to meet future energy needs. Recently, there has been increased interest from states and commercial companies in building an energy-supplying fusion power plant. In addition to the technical challenge, an appropriate choice of the site is necessary. This study examines possible sites by applying a multi-criteria integrated assessment to evaluate sites for a 1GW<sub>el</sub> fusion power plant unit, in terms of infrastructure-related information and georeferenced datasets at a European scale. This enables well-founded decisions on potential sites and serves as the basis for the subsequent licensing of a fusion power plant. The paper presents a geographic information system (GIS)-based multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) for site selection. Seven exclusionary and nine discretionary criteria, organized into categories, are identified and applied in a two-stage decision-making process. Exclusionary criteria categories include the existence and sufficiency of cooling water, suitability of seismological conditions, environmental sensitivity, and land use. Discretionary criteria categories include electrical power infrastructure, natural conditions, and socio-economic infrastructure. Sensitivity analyses assess the impact of varying criteria and criterion weightings on the preferred candidate sites. Furthermore, the framework was benchmarked using sites from real fusion projects and previous studies. In the different cases, 0.04-0.15% of the European area is classified as “Highest preference” and 0.21-0.48% as “High preference”.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 102241"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X26002075","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Electricity is essential to human quality of life and should be generated in a sustainable, low-carbon, and environmentally responsible way to meet global demand. Nuclear fusion offers a clean energy opportunity to meet future energy needs. Recently, there has been increased interest from states and commercial companies in building an energy-supplying fusion power plant. In addition to the technical challenge, an appropriate choice of the site is necessary. This study examines possible sites by applying a multi-criteria integrated assessment to evaluate sites for a 1GWel fusion power plant unit, in terms of infrastructure-related information and georeferenced datasets at a European scale. This enables well-founded decisions on potential sites and serves as the basis for the subsequent licensing of a fusion power plant. The paper presents a geographic information system (GIS)-based multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) for site selection. Seven exclusionary and nine discretionary criteria, organized into categories, are identified and applied in a two-stage decision-making process. Exclusionary criteria categories include the existence and sufficiency of cooling water, suitability of seismological conditions, environmental sensitivity, and land use. Discretionary criteria categories include electrical power infrastructure, natural conditions, and socio-economic infrastructure. Sensitivity analyses assess the impact of varying criteria and criterion weightings on the preferred candidate sites. Furthermore, the framework was benchmarked using sites from real fusion projects and previous studies. In the different cases, 0.04-0.15% of the European area is classified as “Highest preference” and 0.21-0.48% as “High preference”.
期刊介绍:
Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs.
Energy Strategy Reviews publishes:
• Analyses
• Methodologies
• Case Studies
• Reviews
And by invitation:
• Report Reviews
• Viewpoints