Effect of China's new rural pension scheme on the consumption of relatively poor households

IF 5.7 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Journal of Rural Studies Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104196
Bing He , Jianying Wang , Jian Wu , Guoheng Hu
{"title":"Effect of China's new rural pension scheme on the consumption of relatively poor households","authors":"Bing He ,&nbsp;Jianying Wang ,&nbsp;Jian Wu ,&nbsp;Guoheng Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the relationship between China's New Rural Pension Scheme (NRPS) and the consumption behavior of relatively poor rural households is crucial for enhancing the targeting of social pension policies and improving multitier social security systems. Using panel data from the China Family Panel Studies of 2014, 2016, and 2018, this study uses fixed-effect models and instrumental variable approaches to examine the effect of NRPS participation and receipt on household consumption. We find the following: (1) Participation in NRPS significantly reduces consumption among relatively poor rural households, whereas receipt of NRPS benefits has a significant positive effect on consumption. (2) Heterogeneity analysis shows that NRPS participation notably decreases subsistence- and enjoyment-oriented consumption, while benefit receipt significantly increases subsistence-, development-, and enjoyment-oriented consumption. Moreover, the consumption effects of NRPS are more pronounced among households with a higher marginal propensity to consume. (3) Mechanism analysis indicates that participation suppresses consumption by tightening household liquidity constraints, whereas benefit receipt increases consumption by relaxing liquidity constraints and reducing precautionary savings. These findings provide empirical evidence for designing more efficient and inclusive rural social pension systems in China and other developing countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 104196"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016726001981","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the relationship between China's New Rural Pension Scheme (NRPS) and the consumption behavior of relatively poor rural households is crucial for enhancing the targeting of social pension policies and improving multitier social security systems. Using panel data from the China Family Panel Studies of 2014, 2016, and 2018, this study uses fixed-effect models and instrumental variable approaches to examine the effect of NRPS participation and receipt on household consumption. We find the following: (1) Participation in NRPS significantly reduces consumption among relatively poor rural households, whereas receipt of NRPS benefits has a significant positive effect on consumption. (2) Heterogeneity analysis shows that NRPS participation notably decreases subsistence- and enjoyment-oriented consumption, while benefit receipt significantly increases subsistence-, development-, and enjoyment-oriented consumption. Moreover, the consumption effects of NRPS are more pronounced among households with a higher marginal propensity to consume. (3) Mechanism analysis indicates that participation suppresses consumption by tightening household liquidity constraints, whereas benefit receipt increases consumption by relaxing liquidity constraints and reducing precautionary savings. These findings provide empirical evidence for designing more efficient and inclusive rural social pension systems in China and other developing countries.
中国新型农村养老保险制度对相对贫困家庭消费的影响
了解新农村养老保险与相对贫困农户消费行为之间的关系,对于提高社会养老保险政策的针对性和完善多层次社会保障体系具有重要意义。本研究利用2014年、2016年和2018年中国家庭面板研究的面板数据,采用固定效应模型和工具变量方法,考察了新农保计划参与和接受对家庭消费的影响。研究发现:(1)参与新农保计划显著降低了相对贫困农户的消费,而领取新农保计划对消费有显著的正向影响。(2)异质性分析表明,参与新退休计划显著降低了温饱型消费和享受型消费,而领取福利显著提高了温饱型消费、发展型消费和享受型消费。此外,在边际消费倾向较高的家庭中,NRPS的消费效应更为明显。(3)机制分析表明,参与通过收紧家庭流动性约束来抑制消费,而领取福利通过放松流动性约束和减少预防性储蓄来促进消费。这些发现为中国和其他发展中国家设计更高效、更具包容性的农村社会养老保险制度提供了实证依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书