Induction of labor is not associated with decreased rates of breastfeeding in late preterm pregnancies

AJOG global reports Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-28 DOI:10.1016/j.xagr.2026.100637
Alice Sutton MD , Daniella Rogerson MD, MS , Samantha Thomson MD , Gina Frugoni MD , Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman MD, MS
{"title":"Induction of labor is not associated with decreased rates of breastfeeding in late preterm pregnancies","authors":"Alice Sutton MD ,&nbsp;Daniella Rogerson MD, MS ,&nbsp;Samantha Thomson MD ,&nbsp;Gina Frugoni MD ,&nbsp;Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.xagr.2026.100637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Some studies suggest that induction of labor at term is associated with lower rates of breastfeeding than spontaneous labor.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Our objective was to evaluate whether late preterm medically indicated induction of labor is associated with decreased rates of breastfeeding and/or increased rates of breastfeeding complications at the time of discharge from the delivery hospitalization.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>This secondary analysis of a randomized trial of individuals at high risk for late preterm delivery, defined as delivery between 34+0 and 36+6 weeks, included nonanomalous, singleton pregnancies and excluded those with unlabored cesareans or preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. The parent study collected detailed data on breastfeeding and the presence of breastfeeding difficulties, defined as issues in milk production or infant feeding. Subjects with incomplete breastfeeding data were additionally excluded. Participants undergoing late preterm indicted inductions were compared to those who presented with spontaneous preterm labor. The primary outcome, the rate of breastfeeding, was compared between groups. Breastfeeding difficulties were also compared. Baseline demographics were compared using bivariable analyses. We fit logistic regression models to adjust for confounders related to breastfeeding.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Two thousand one hundred thirty participants were included. Spontaneous and induction groups were similar in age, tobacco use, gestational diabetes, and insurance type but the induced group had higher body mass index, rates of chronic hypertension and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). The rate of breastfeeding did not differ in induced vs spontaneous participants (69.0% vs 68.7%, <em>P</em>=.90). However, breastfeeding difficulties were more common in the induced group in unadjusted analyses (38.8% vs 32.3%, <em>P=</em>.01). After adjusting for confounders, neither breastfeeding rates nor breastfeeding difficulties were different between groups. Of note, government insurance was an independent risk factor for low breastfeeding rates and induction was associated with a decreased rate of cesarean delivery</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Medically indicated late preterm labor induction was not associated with decreased rates of breastfeeding or increased breastfeeding problems at time of discharge from the delivery hospitalization. Those with government funded insurance may need additional breastfeeding support.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72141,"journal":{"name":"AJOG global reports","volume":"6 2","pages":"Article 100637"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOG global reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577826000353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Some studies suggest that induction of labor at term is associated with lower rates of breastfeeding than spontaneous labor.

Objective

Our objective was to evaluate whether late preterm medically indicated induction of labor is associated with decreased rates of breastfeeding and/or increased rates of breastfeeding complications at the time of discharge from the delivery hospitalization.

Study Design

This secondary analysis of a randomized trial of individuals at high risk for late preterm delivery, defined as delivery between 34+0 and 36+6 weeks, included nonanomalous, singleton pregnancies and excluded those with unlabored cesareans or preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. The parent study collected detailed data on breastfeeding and the presence of breastfeeding difficulties, defined as issues in milk production or infant feeding. Subjects with incomplete breastfeeding data were additionally excluded. Participants undergoing late preterm indicted inductions were compared to those who presented with spontaneous preterm labor. The primary outcome, the rate of breastfeeding, was compared between groups. Breastfeeding difficulties were also compared. Baseline demographics were compared using bivariable analyses. We fit logistic regression models to adjust for confounders related to breastfeeding.

Results

Two thousand one hundred thirty participants were included. Spontaneous and induction groups were similar in age, tobacco use, gestational diabetes, and insurance type but the induced group had higher body mass index, rates of chronic hypertension and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). The rate of breastfeeding did not differ in induced vs spontaneous participants (69.0% vs 68.7%, P=.90). However, breastfeeding difficulties were more common in the induced group in unadjusted analyses (38.8% vs 32.3%, P=.01). After adjusting for confounders, neither breastfeeding rates nor breastfeeding difficulties were different between groups. Of note, government insurance was an independent risk factor for low breastfeeding rates and induction was associated with a decreased rate of cesarean delivery

Conclusion

Medically indicated late preterm labor induction was not associated with decreased rates of breastfeeding or increased breastfeeding problems at time of discharge from the delivery hospitalization. Those with government funded insurance may need additional breastfeeding support.
引产与晚期早产儿母乳喂养率的降低无关
一些研究表明,足月引产与自然分娩相比,母乳喂养率较低。目的:我们的目的是评估晚期早产医学指征引产是否与分娩出院时母乳喂养率降低和/或母乳喂养并发症发生率增加有关。研究设计:本研究对晚期早产高风险个体的随机试验进行了二次分析,晚期早产定义为分娩时间在34+0至36+6周之间,包括非异常妊娠、单胎妊娠,排除未产剖宫产或早产产前胎膜破裂。父母研究收集了关于母乳喂养和母乳喂养困难的详细数据,定义为母乳生产或婴儿喂养方面的问题。母乳喂养数据不完整的受试者也被排除在外。接受晚期早产起诉诱导的参与者与自然早产的参与者进行了比较。比较各组之间的主要指标母乳喂养率。还比较了母乳喂养困难。基线人口统计数据采用双变量分析进行比较。我们拟合逻辑回归模型来调整与母乳喂养相关的混杂因素。结果共纳入受试者2300人。自发组和诱导组在年龄、烟草使用、妊娠糖尿病和保险类型方面相似,但诱导组的体重指数、慢性高血压和妊娠高血压疾病(HDP)发生率更高。母乳喂养率在诱导和自发参与者中没有差异(69.0%对68.7%,P= 0.90)。然而,在未调整分析中,母乳喂养困难在诱导组更常见(38.8%比32.3%,P= 0.01)。在调整混杂因素后,各组之间的母乳喂养率和母乳喂养困难都没有差异。值得注意的是,政府保险是低母乳喂养率的独立危险因素,而引产与剖宫产率下降有关。结论医学指示的晚期早产引产与分娩出院时母乳喂养率下降或母乳喂养问题增加无关。那些有政府资助保险的人可能需要额外的母乳喂养支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJOG global reports
AJOG global reports Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Perinatology, Pediatrics and Child Health, Urology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书