{"title":"Built Environment Inequality and the Spatial Structure of Digital Mobility Networks Evidence from Shared Bicycle Systems in Shenzhen","authors":"Yuhang Xia, Ying Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s12061-026-09874-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Shared bicycle systems are increasingly central to sustainable urban mobility, yet they often reflect and amplify spatial inequalities in the built environment. Existing studies focus on static correlations between urban features and mobility, relying on linear models and uniform spatial assumptions, leaving unclear how local inequalities shape the emergent structure of digital mobility networks. This study investigates how built environment inequality shapes the spatial structure of digital mobility networks, using dockless bike-sharing in Shenzhen as an empirical case. To capture complex nonlinear and spatially heterogeneous effects, we employ a hybrid analytical strategy integrating XGBoost-SHAP for feature importance and nonlinear interpretation, and Geographically Weighted Gaussian Process Regression for continuous spatial heterogeneity analysis. Our findings reveal that built environment inequality nonlinearly and spatially heterogeneously molds digital mobility networks. Inequalities in transport and service facilities emerge as dominant drivers, producing monotonic, threshold, and saturation effects that vary across network dimensions. Core urban areas experience amplified network intensity, connectivity, and destination diversity, while peripheral zones show attenuated or suppressive effects, reflecting a pronounced core-periphery gradient. These findings provide empirical evidence for designing inclusive, network-oriented urban mobility policies that account for multidimensional and spatially contingent inequalities.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46392,"journal":{"name":"Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy","volume":"19 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12061-026-09874-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Shared bicycle systems are increasingly central to sustainable urban mobility, yet they often reflect and amplify spatial inequalities in the built environment. Existing studies focus on static correlations between urban features and mobility, relying on linear models and uniform spatial assumptions, leaving unclear how local inequalities shape the emergent structure of digital mobility networks. This study investigates how built environment inequality shapes the spatial structure of digital mobility networks, using dockless bike-sharing in Shenzhen as an empirical case. To capture complex nonlinear and spatially heterogeneous effects, we employ a hybrid analytical strategy integrating XGBoost-SHAP for feature importance and nonlinear interpretation, and Geographically Weighted Gaussian Process Regression for continuous spatial heterogeneity analysis. Our findings reveal that built environment inequality nonlinearly and spatially heterogeneously molds digital mobility networks. Inequalities in transport and service facilities emerge as dominant drivers, producing monotonic, threshold, and saturation effects that vary across network dimensions. Core urban areas experience amplified network intensity, connectivity, and destination diversity, while peripheral zones show attenuated or suppressive effects, reflecting a pronounced core-periphery gradient. These findings provide empirical evidence for designing inclusive, network-oriented urban mobility policies that account for multidimensional and spatially contingent inequalities.
期刊介绍:
Description
The journal has an applied focus: it actively promotes the importance of geographical research in real world settings
It is policy-relevant: it seeks both a readership and contributions from practitioners as well as academics
The substantive foundation is spatial analysis: the use of quantitative techniques to identify patterns and processes within geographic environments
The combination of these points, which are fully reflected in the naming of the journal, establishes a unique position in the marketplace.
RationaleA geographical perspective has always been crucial to the understanding of the social and physical organisation of the world around us. The techniques of spatial analysis provide a powerful means for the assembly and interpretation of evidence, and thus to address critical questions about issues such as crime and deprivation, immigration and demographic restructuring, retailing activity and employment change, resource management and environmental improvement. Many of these issues are equally important to academic research as they are to policy makers and Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy aims to close the gap between these two perspectives by providing a forum for discussion of applied research in a range of different contexts
Topical and interdisciplinaryIncreasingly government organisations, administrative agencies and private businesses are requiring research to support their ‘evidence-based’ strategies or policies. Geographical location is critical in much of this work which extends across a wide range of disciplines including demography, actuarial sciences, statistics, public sector planning, business planning, economics, epidemiology, sociology, social policy, health research, environmental management.
FocusApplied Spatial Analysis and Policy will draw on applied research from diverse problem domains, such as transport, policing, education, health, environment and leisure, in different international contexts. The journal will therefore provide insights into the variations in phenomena that exist across space, it will provide evidence for comparative policy analysis between domains and between locations, and stimulate ideas about the translation of spatial analysis methods and techniques across varied policy contexts. It is essential to know how to measure, monitor and understand spatial distributions, many of which have implications for those with responsibility to plan and enhance the society and the environment in which we all exist.
Readership and Editorial BoardAs a journal focused on applications of methods of spatial analysis, Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy will be of interest to scholars and students in a wide range of academic fields, to practitioners in government and administrative agencies and to consultants in private sector organisations. The Editorial Board reflects the international and multidisciplinary nature of the journal.