The logic of pollution has changed: a new paradigm of PM2.5 exposure dominated by human footprints

IF 1.9 4区 社会学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Hongsheng Chen, Wentao Xiang, Zihao Wang, Junle Huang, Li Li
{"title":"The logic of pollution has changed: a new paradigm of PM2.5 exposure dominated by human footprints","authors":"Hongsheng Chen,&nbsp;Wentao Xiang,&nbsp;Zihao Wang,&nbsp;Junle Huang,&nbsp;Li Li","doi":"10.1007/s12061-026-09876-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In conventional air pollution research, natural dispersion, industrial emissions, and ecological absorption are typically regarded as the dominant mechanisms shaping PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure. However, under conditions of intensified human intervention in the Earth’s surface, this logic is undergoing a paradigmatic shift. Drawing on multi-regional panel data from China spanning 2015–2022, this study develops a machine learning model with PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations as the outcome variable. By incorporating the Human Footprint Index (HF), alongside a suite of ecological, meteorological, and socio-economic variables, the analysis seeks to identify the associated mechanisms underlying pollution anomalies. The results indicate that: (1) at the global scale, the Human Footprint Index (HF) surpasses all natural and socio-economic variables, emerging as the primary determinant of PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure; (2) the effect of HF exhibits pronounced regional heterogeneity, with a strong positive structure observed in Central and Northeastern China, while in the Eastern region the effect tends towards neutrality due to more favourable dispersion conditions and intensified governance, and although the overall contribution in the Western region remains relatively low; (3) the marginal pollution effect of HF demonstrates a nonlinear threshold pattern, appearing buffered or insensitive at low-intensity levels, but rising sharply in pollution risk once a critical threshold is exceeded. The findings suggest that the explanatory logic of air pollution is shifting towards a new paradigm centred on the Human Footprint. Accordingly, this study advocates the development of a pollution early-warning and governance framework that is sensitive to the intensity of human activity and grounded in the identification of spatial threshold effects. The analysis further demonstrates the theoretical and practical potential of interpretable machine learning for uncovering pollution-related mechanisms and informing regionally differentiated policy design.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46392,"journal":{"name":"Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy","volume":"19 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12061-026-09876-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In conventional air pollution research, natural dispersion, industrial emissions, and ecological absorption are typically regarded as the dominant mechanisms shaping PM2.5 exposure. However, under conditions of intensified human intervention in the Earth’s surface, this logic is undergoing a paradigmatic shift. Drawing on multi-regional panel data from China spanning 2015–2022, this study develops a machine learning model with PM2.5 concentrations as the outcome variable. By incorporating the Human Footprint Index (HF), alongside a suite of ecological, meteorological, and socio-economic variables, the analysis seeks to identify the associated mechanisms underlying pollution anomalies. The results indicate that: (1) at the global scale, the Human Footprint Index (HF) surpasses all natural and socio-economic variables, emerging as the primary determinant of PM2.5 exposure; (2) the effect of HF exhibits pronounced regional heterogeneity, with a strong positive structure observed in Central and Northeastern China, while in the Eastern region the effect tends towards neutrality due to more favourable dispersion conditions and intensified governance, and although the overall contribution in the Western region remains relatively low; (3) the marginal pollution effect of HF demonstrates a nonlinear threshold pattern, appearing buffered or insensitive at low-intensity levels, but rising sharply in pollution risk once a critical threshold is exceeded. The findings suggest that the explanatory logic of air pollution is shifting towards a new paradigm centred on the Human Footprint. Accordingly, this study advocates the development of a pollution early-warning and governance framework that is sensitive to the intensity of human activity and grounded in the identification of spatial threshold effects. The analysis further demonstrates the theoretical and practical potential of interpretable machine learning for uncovering pollution-related mechanisms and informing regionally differentiated policy design.

污染的逻辑发生了变化:人类足迹主导了PM2.5暴露的新范式
在传统的大气污染研究中,通常认为自然扩散、工业排放和生态吸收是形成PM2.5暴露的主要机制。然而,在人类对地球表面干预加剧的情况下,这种逻辑正在发生范式转变。利用中国2015-2022年的多区域面板数据,本研究开发了一个以PM2.5浓度为结果变量的机器学习模型。通过结合人类足迹指数(HF),以及一系列生态、气象和社会经济变量,该分析旨在确定污染异常的相关机制。结果表明:(1)在全球尺度上,人类足迹指数(HF)超过了所有自然和社会经济变量,成为PM2.5暴露的主要决定因素;②高频效应呈现出明显的区域异质性,中部和东北地区呈现出较强的正向结构,而东部地区由于更有利的分散条件和更强的治理,高频效应趋于中性,但西部地区的总体贡献率仍然相对较低;(3) HF的边际污染效应表现为非线性阈值模式,在低强度水平下表现为缓冲或不敏感,但一旦超过临界阈值,污染风险急剧上升。研究结果表明,空气污染的解释逻辑正在转向以人类足迹为中心的新范式。因此,本研究主张建立一个对人类活动强度敏感的污染预警和治理框架,并以识别空间阈值效应为基础。该分析进一步证明了可解释机器学习在揭示污染相关机制和为区域差异化政策设计提供信息方面的理论和实践潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Description The journal has an applied focus: it actively promotes the importance of geographical research in real world settings It is policy-relevant: it seeks both a readership and contributions from practitioners as well as academics The substantive foundation is spatial analysis: the use of quantitative techniques to identify patterns and processes within geographic environments The combination of these points, which are fully reflected in the naming of the journal, establishes a unique position in the marketplace. RationaleA geographical perspective has always been crucial to the understanding of the social and physical organisation of the world around us. The techniques of spatial analysis provide a powerful means for the assembly and interpretation of evidence, and thus to address critical questions about issues such as crime and deprivation, immigration and demographic restructuring, retailing activity and employment change, resource management and environmental improvement. Many of these issues are equally important to academic research as they are to policy makers and Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy aims to close the gap between these two perspectives by providing a forum for discussion of applied research in a range of different contexts  Topical and interdisciplinaryIncreasingly government organisations, administrative agencies and private businesses are requiring research to support their ‘evidence-based’ strategies or policies. Geographical location is critical in much of this work which extends across a wide range of disciplines including demography, actuarial sciences, statistics, public sector planning, business planning, economics, epidemiology, sociology, social policy, health research, environmental management.   FocusApplied Spatial Analysis and Policy will draw on applied research from diverse problem domains, such as transport, policing, education, health, environment and leisure, in different international contexts. The journal will therefore provide insights into the variations in phenomena that exist across space, it will provide evidence for comparative policy analysis between domains and between locations, and stimulate ideas about the translation of spatial analysis methods and techniques across varied policy contexts. It is essential to know how to measure, monitor and understand spatial distributions, many of which have implications for those with responsibility to plan and enhance the society and the environment in which we all exist.   Readership and Editorial BoardAs a journal focused on applications of methods of spatial analysis, Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy will be of interest to scholars and students in a wide range of academic fields, to practitioners in government and administrative agencies and to consultants in private sector organisations. The Editorial Board reflects the international and multidisciplinary nature of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书