Understanding in conditions of neutrality: a closer look at its objects

Miloud Belkoniene
{"title":"Understanding in conditions of neutrality: a closer look at its objects","authors":"Miloud Belkoniene","doi":"10.1007/s44204-026-00410-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In her article titled ‘A portrait of understanding as a non-factive state’, Sjölin Wirling provides an engaging ‘portrait’ of a type of understanding—termed ‘non-factive objectual understanding’—that inquirers who have yet to settle certain questions concerning a target phenomenon can achieve under particular conditions. This paper investigates whether, in the situations Sjölin Wirling discusses, the relevant epistemic improvements really are improvements in our understanding <i>of</i> phenomena.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93890,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of philosophy","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44204-026-00410-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In her article titled ‘A portrait of understanding as a non-factive state’, Sjölin Wirling provides an engaging ‘portrait’ of a type of understanding—termed ‘non-factive objectual understanding’—that inquirers who have yet to settle certain questions concerning a target phenomenon can achieve under particular conditions. This paper investigates whether, in the situations Sjölin Wirling discusses, the relevant epistemic improvements really are improvements in our understanding of phenomena.

在中立条件下的理解:更仔细地观察它的对象
在她题为“作为一种非事实状态的理解的画像”的文章中,Sjölin Wirling提供了一幅引人入胜的理解类型的“画像”——被称为“非事实的客观理解”——那些尚未解决有关目标现象的某些问题的调查者可以在特定条件下实现。本文考察了Sjölin Wirling讨论的情况下,相关的认知改进是否真的是我们对现象理解的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书