Effectiveness of tinnitus retraining therapy in alleviating tinnitus symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Muhnnad A AlGhamdi, Ghaida Essa Alharbi, Danah Mohammed Saleh Aljahdali, Shahad Albeladi, Yousef Ismail Alaqsam, Moayyad Malas, Haya Alsubaie
{"title":"Effectiveness of tinnitus retraining therapy in alleviating tinnitus symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Muhnnad A AlGhamdi, Ghaida Essa Alharbi, Danah Mohammed Saleh Aljahdali, Shahad Albeladi, Yousef Ismail Alaqsam, Moayyad Malas, Haya Alsubaie","doi":"10.14639/0392-100X-A826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study systematically evaluated and analysed existing evidence regarding the effectiveness of tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) in treating tinnitus at different follow-up periods and the factors that influence the choice of treatment.</p><p><strong>Databases reviewed: </strong>Medline, OpenAIRE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, Springer Nature Journals, Science Citation Index Expanded, and PubMed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from multiple sources. Studies on adults with tinnitus, experiencing stable, bothersome, and chronic symptoms were included. Participants with significant comorbid conditions potentially influencing TRT outcomes and traumatic injuries were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>A total of 18 articles were included in the qualitative assessment. The studies included encompassed various geographical locations and study settings, with a total of 1712 participants, of whom 1011 underwent TRT and 701 were in the comparison group who were receiving alternative treatments. Gender distribution among participants revealed 1097 males and 596 females. The analysis consistently demonstrated improvements in tinnitus severity and quality of life following TRT, as assessed by Tinnitus Handicap Index, Tinnitus Questionnaire, and Visual Analogue Scale. The meta-analysis revealed significant heterogeneity among studies; however, sensitivity analyses demonstrated consistent results. Additionally, publication bias assessment indicated no systematic bias in effect sizes across studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that TRT holds promise as an effective intervention for managing tinnitus. Further well-designed randomised controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings and advance our understanding of TRT's efficacy in treating tinnitus.</p>","PeriodicalId":520544,"journal":{"name":"Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale","volume":"46 2","pages":"73-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13113191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-A826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study systematically evaluated and analysed existing evidence regarding the effectiveness of tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) in treating tinnitus at different follow-up periods and the factors that influence the choice of treatment.

Databases reviewed: Medline, OpenAIRE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, Springer Nature Journals, Science Citation Index Expanded, and PubMed.

Methods: Data were collected from multiple sources. Studies on adults with tinnitus, experiencing stable, bothersome, and chronic symptoms were included. Participants with significant comorbid conditions potentially influencing TRT outcomes and traumatic injuries were excluded.

Results and discussion: A total of 18 articles were included in the qualitative assessment. The studies included encompassed various geographical locations and study settings, with a total of 1712 participants, of whom 1011 underwent TRT and 701 were in the comparison group who were receiving alternative treatments. Gender distribution among participants revealed 1097 males and 596 females. The analysis consistently demonstrated improvements in tinnitus severity and quality of life following TRT, as assessed by Tinnitus Handicap Index, Tinnitus Questionnaire, and Visual Analogue Scale. The meta-analysis revealed significant heterogeneity among studies; however, sensitivity analyses demonstrated consistent results. Additionally, publication bias assessment indicated no systematic bias in effect sizes across studies.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that TRT holds promise as an effective intervention for managing tinnitus. Further well-designed randomised controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings and advance our understanding of TRT's efficacy in treating tinnitus.

耳鸣再训练治疗缓解耳鸣症状的有效性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:系统评价和分析耳鸣再训练疗法(TRT)在不同随访期治疗耳鸣的有效性及影响治疗方案选择的因素。数据库综述:Medline, OpenAIRE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central), Scopus,施普林格Nature Journals, Science Citation Index Expanded和PubMed。方法:多渠道收集资料。研究对象包括有稳定、困扰和慢性症状的耳鸣成人。排除有可能影响TRT结果和创伤性损伤的显著合并症的参与者。结果与讨论:定性评价共纳入18篇文章。这些研究包括不同的地理位置和研究环境,共有1712名参与者,其中1011名接受TRT治疗,701名接受替代治疗的对照组。参与者的性别分布显示,男性1097人,女性596人。根据耳鸣障碍指数、耳鸣问卷和视觉模拟量表评估,分析一致表明TRT后耳鸣严重程度和生活质量得到改善。meta分析显示各研究之间存在显著的异质性;然而,敏感性分析显示了一致的结果。此外,发表偏倚评估表明,各研究的效应大小没有系统性偏倚。结论:这些发现表明TRT有望成为治疗耳鸣的有效干预措施。进一步精心设计的随机对照试验有必要证实这些发现,并促进我们对TRT治疗耳鸣疗效的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书