Comparative analysis between mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy for the management of renal lithiasis.

A Hernández Pérez, N Gallego Mellado, O Sánchez París, N Albertos Mira-Marcelí, M E Martín Hortiguela, V Díaz Díaz, C Abril Sánchez, J Adatty Molina, A Encinas Goenechea, J Gonzálvez Piñera
{"title":"Comparative analysis between mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy for the management of renal lithiasis.","authors":"A Hernández Pérez, N Gallego Mellado, O Sánchez París, N Albertos Mira-Marcelí, M E Martín Hortiguela, V Díaz Díaz, C Abril Sánchez, J Adatty Molina, A Encinas Goenechea, J Gonzálvez Piñera","doi":"10.54847/cp.2026.02.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe and compare the effectiveness and complications in our center with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and flexible ureterorenoscopy (URS) techniques for kidney stones.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Retrospective study with patients aged 0-14 years undergoing lithotomy at our center from 2009-2024. Demographic variables, medical history, location, size, stone composition, stone-free rate, operative time, hospital stay, and early complications (Clavien-Madadi scale) are analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty cases were obtained: 9 URS and 11 mini-PCNL. The mean age was 8 years (4.71-9.56) with 57.9% males. 42% presented some lithogenic factor (3 cystinuria, 2 hypercalciuria). No differences were found between URS and mini-PCNL groups (p> 0.05) in age, sex, location, size, medical history, composition, operative time [150 (110-250) vs 120 (70-243) min], hospital stay [1 (1-2) vs 1 (1-2) days], or double J stent placement. The stone-free rate was 45% for mini-PCNL and 30% for URS (p= 0.042). The complication rate was 66% for URS [3 cases of urinary tract infection (CM II), 3 stone migration (CM IIIa)]; and 18% for mini-PCNL [1 case of pain (CM II) and 1 stone migration (CM IIIa)], with statistically significant differences being found (p= 0.02, relative risk of complication or RR= 1.14).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mini-PCNL is an effective and safe technique for the treatment of kidney stones, with higher stone-free rates than URS and fewer complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":94306,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia pediatrica : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Cirugia Pediatrica","volume":"39 2","pages":"77-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia pediatrica : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Cirugia Pediatrica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54847/cp.2026.02.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To describe and compare the effectiveness and complications in our center with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and flexible ureterorenoscopy (URS) techniques for kidney stones.

Material and methods: Retrospective study with patients aged 0-14 years undergoing lithotomy at our center from 2009-2024. Demographic variables, medical history, location, size, stone composition, stone-free rate, operative time, hospital stay, and early complications (Clavien-Madadi scale) are analyzed.

Results: Twenty cases were obtained: 9 URS and 11 mini-PCNL. The mean age was 8 years (4.71-9.56) with 57.9% males. 42% presented some lithogenic factor (3 cystinuria, 2 hypercalciuria). No differences were found between URS and mini-PCNL groups (p> 0.05) in age, sex, location, size, medical history, composition, operative time [150 (110-250) vs 120 (70-243) min], hospital stay [1 (1-2) vs 1 (1-2) days], or double J stent placement. The stone-free rate was 45% for mini-PCNL and 30% for URS (p= 0.042). The complication rate was 66% for URS [3 cases of urinary tract infection (CM II), 3 stone migration (CM IIIa)]; and 18% for mini-PCNL [1 case of pain (CM II) and 1 stone migration (CM IIIa)], with statistically significant differences being found (p= 0.02, relative risk of complication or RR= 1.14).

Conclusions: Mini-PCNL is an effective and safe technique for the treatment of kidney stones, with higher stone-free rates than URS and fewer complications.

经皮微型肾镜取石术与输尿管软镜治疗肾结石的比较分析。
目的:描述和比较我中心微型经皮肾镜取石术(mini-PCNL)和柔性输尿管镜(URS)治疗肾结石的疗效和并发症。材料与方法:回顾性研究2009-2024年在我中心接受取石手术的0-14岁患者。分析人口统计学变量、病史、位置、大小、结石组成、结石清除率、手术时间、住院时间和早期并发症(Clavien-Madadi量表)。结果:20例:尿路损伤9例,mini-PCNL 11例。平均年龄8岁(4.71 ~ 9.56岁),男性占57.9%。42%存在一定的产石因素(胱氨酸尿3例,高钙尿2例)。URS组与mini-PCNL组在年龄、性别、位置、大小、病史、组成、手术时间[150 (110-250)vs 120 (70-243) min]、住院时间[1 (1-2)vs 1(1-2)天]、双J型支架置放等方面均无差异(p < 0.05)。mini-PCNL无结石率为45%,URS为30% (p= 0.042)。尿路感染3例(CM II),结石移位3例(CM IIIa);mini-PCNL为18%[1例疼痛(CM II)和1例结石移位(CM IIIa)],差异有统计学意义(p= 0.02,并发症相对风险或RR= 1.14)。结论:Mini-PCNL是一种安全有效的治疗肾结石的技术,结石清除率高于URS,并发症少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书