Nurse Educators' ChatGPT Use in Canadian Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Qualitative Study.

IF 1.9
The Journal of nursing education Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-27 DOI:10.3928/01484834-20260316-05
Laura Vogelsang, Anila Naz, Manal Kleib
{"title":"Nurse Educators' ChatGPT Use in Canadian Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Laura Vogelsang, Anila Naz, Manal Kleib","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20260316-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heath care and education have both experienced rapid growth in artificial intelligence (AI) use, especially with generative tools such as ChatGPT. This study explores nurse educators' perspectives on ChatGPT's educational value, implementation challenges, and implications for professional standards.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data collection included 26 semistructured interviews with Canadian undergraduate nursing educators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven themes were generated by the research team through thematic analysis. Despite the perceived usefulness of ChatGPT, educators expressed concerns about plagiarism, overreliance, diminished critical thinking, and risks to clinical competence. While nurse educators are cautiously optimistic about the potential for ChatGPT integration into nursing curricula, concerns remain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides the first overview of Canadian undergraduate nurse educators' perspectives on ChatGPT use. As generative AI evolves and changes over time, nursing education must continue to evaluate and monitor the pedagogical influence and support necessary competencies for both students and educators to ensure responsible use.</p>","PeriodicalId":94241,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of nursing education","volume":" ","pages":"461-469"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of nursing education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20260316-05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Heath care and education have both experienced rapid growth in artificial intelligence (AI) use, especially with generative tools such as ChatGPT. This study explores nurse educators' perspectives on ChatGPT's educational value, implementation challenges, and implications for professional standards.

Method: Data collection included 26 semistructured interviews with Canadian undergraduate nursing educators.

Results: Seven themes were generated by the research team through thematic analysis. Despite the perceived usefulness of ChatGPT, educators expressed concerns about plagiarism, overreliance, diminished critical thinking, and risks to clinical competence. While nurse educators are cautiously optimistic about the potential for ChatGPT integration into nursing curricula, concerns remain.

Conclusion: This study provides the first overview of Canadian undergraduate nurse educators' perspectives on ChatGPT use. As generative AI evolves and changes over time, nursing education must continue to evaluate and monitor the pedagogical influence and support necessary competencies for both students and educators to ensure responsible use.

加拿大本科护理教育中护士教育者ChatGPT的使用:一项质的研究。
背景:医疗保健和教育都经历了人工智能(AI)使用的快速增长,特别是像ChatGPT这样的生成工具。本研究探讨了护士教育工作者对ChatGPT的教育价值、实施挑战和对专业标准的影响的看法。方法:对加拿大本科护理教育工作者进行了26次半结构化访谈。结果:通过主题分析,研究团队产生了七个主题。尽管认为ChatGPT很有用,但教育工作者对抄袭、过度依赖、批判性思维减弱和临床能力风险表示担忧。虽然护理教育工作者对ChatGPT整合到护理课程中的潜力持谨慎乐观态度,但担忧仍然存在。结论:本研究首次概述了加拿大本科护士教育工作者对ChatGPT使用的看法。随着人工智能的不断发展和变化,护理教育必须继续评估和监测教学影响,并为学生和教育工作者提供必要的能力支持,以确保负责任地使用人工智能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书