Mild cognitive impairment cases affect the predictive power of Alzheimer's disease diagnostic models using routine clinical variables.

IF 6 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Caitlin A Finney, Artur Shvetcov
{"title":"Mild cognitive impairment cases affect the predictive power of Alzheimer's disease diagnostic models using routine clinical variables.","authors":"Caitlin A Finney, Artur Shvetcov","doi":"10.1038/s41514-026-00390-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diagnostic models using primary care routine clinical variables have been limited in their ability to identify Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. In this study, we sought to better understand the effect of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) on the predictive performance of AD diagnostic models. We sourced data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort. CatBoost was used to assess the utility of routine clinical variables that are accessible to primary care physicians, such as hematological and blood tests and medical history, in multiclass classification between healthy controls, MCI, and AD. Our results indicated that MCI indeed affected the predictive performance of AD diagnostic models. Of the three subgroups of MCI that we found, this finding was driven by a subgroup of MCI patients who likely have prodromal AD. This work highlights the importance of continuing to focus on better classification of the different types of MCI to improve diagnostic models of AD, rather than focusing on binary classifications between AD and control cases. Future research should focus on distinguishing MCI from prodromal AD as the utmost priority for improving translational AD diagnostic models for primary care physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":94160,"journal":{"name":"npj aging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41514-026-00390-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diagnostic models using primary care routine clinical variables have been limited in their ability to identify Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. In this study, we sought to better understand the effect of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) on the predictive performance of AD diagnostic models. We sourced data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort. CatBoost was used to assess the utility of routine clinical variables that are accessible to primary care physicians, such as hematological and blood tests and medical history, in multiclass classification between healthy controls, MCI, and AD. Our results indicated that MCI indeed affected the predictive performance of AD diagnostic models. Of the three subgroups of MCI that we found, this finding was driven by a subgroup of MCI patients who likely have prodromal AD. This work highlights the importance of continuing to focus on better classification of the different types of MCI to improve diagnostic models of AD, rather than focusing on binary classifications between AD and control cases. Future research should focus on distinguishing MCI from prodromal AD as the utmost priority for improving translational AD diagnostic models for primary care physicians.

轻度认知障碍病例影响使用常规临床变量的阿尔茨海默病诊断模型的预测能力。
使用初级保健常规临床变量的诊断模型在识别阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的能力方面受到限制。在这项研究中,我们试图更好地了解轻度认知障碍(MCI)对阿尔茨海默病诊断模型预测性能的影响。我们的数据来源于阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议(ADNI)队列。CatBoost用于评估初级保健医生可获得的常规临床变量的效用,如血液学和血液检查以及病史,在健康对照、MCI和AD之间的多类别分类中。我们的研究结果表明,MCI确实影响了AD诊断模型的预测性能。在我们发现的三个MCI亚组中,这一发现是由一个可能患有前驱AD的MCI患者亚组推动的。这项工作强调了继续关注不同类型MCI的更好分类以改进AD诊断模型的重要性,而不是关注AD和对照病例之间的二元分类。未来的研究应将重点放在区分轻度认知损伤与前驱AD上,以此作为改善初级保健医生翻译AD诊断模型的重中之重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书