Consensus Building on the Content of a Pediatric Pain Educational Program for Healthcare Professionals in a Low-Resource Setting: A Modified e-Delphi Study.

Paediatric & neonatal pain Pub Date : 2026-04-20 eCollection Date: 2026-06-01 DOI:10.1002/pne2.70031
Abigail Kusi Amponsah, Daniel Ba-Eebu Badengo, Charles Kumi Hammond, Victoria Bam, Joana Kyei-Dompim, Dorothy Wilson, Jerry Armah, Evans Oduro, Faith Nawagi, Snigdha Mukherjee, Anna Axelin
{"title":"Consensus Building on the Content of a Pediatric Pain Educational Program for Healthcare Professionals in a Low-Resource Setting: A Modified e-Delphi Study.","authors":"Abigail Kusi Amponsah, Daniel Ba-Eebu Badengo, Charles Kumi Hammond, Victoria Bam, Joana Kyei-Dompim, Dorothy Wilson, Jerry Armah, Evans Oduro, Faith Nawagi, Snigdha Mukherjee, Anna Axelin","doi":"10.1002/pne2.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare professionals (HCPs) play a key role in improving pain outcomes in hospitalized children. Knowledge gaps can significantly hinder the ability of HCPs to provide optimal pain care. Developing targeted educational interventions to address these gaps requires a clear understanding of priority areas for training on essential pain-related topics. Against this background, this study aimed to establish consensus on topics for a pediatric pain educational program (PPEP) for continuing professional education among HCPs. A two-stage modified e-Delphi study was conducted among experts in pediatric care, health education, and pain research. The researchers developed 35 topics by reviewing the Core Content of the Pediatric Pain PRN Curriculum. In the first and second rounds, experts rated the topics and suggested additional topics. Ratings were done on a four-point Likert scale with options ranging from 1 (not important at all) to 4 (very important). The outcomes from both rounds were analyzed based on the level of consensus. Consensus on a topic was set at a threshold of ≥ 70. A response rate of 88% (<i>n</i> = 22/25) and 100% (<i>n</i> = 22/22) was achieved for the first and second rounds, respectively. Experts rated 35 topics and 5 topics (the topic that failed to achieve consensus in the first round and four new ones generated from expert comments) in the first and second rounds, respectively. In the first round, experts agreed on 34 of the 35 topics (72.7%-90.9%) while all five topics achieved consensus (90.9%-100%) in the second round. Thus, 39 topics under the domains of pain theories, pediatric chronic pain, pain assessment, opioid risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS), biobehavioural strategies, procedural pain, acute pain management and reorientation were agreed on for inclusion in the PPEP. A high level of consensus was achieved among a multidisciplinary panel of experts on the content of the PPEP. This can serve as a valuable resource for interprofessional pain continuing education in low-resource settings. The topics can also be integrated into curricula for preregistration healthcare professionals in such settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94166,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric & neonatal pain","volume":"8 ","pages":"e70031"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13092929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric & neonatal pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pne2.70031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthcare professionals (HCPs) play a key role in improving pain outcomes in hospitalized children. Knowledge gaps can significantly hinder the ability of HCPs to provide optimal pain care. Developing targeted educational interventions to address these gaps requires a clear understanding of priority areas for training on essential pain-related topics. Against this background, this study aimed to establish consensus on topics for a pediatric pain educational program (PPEP) for continuing professional education among HCPs. A two-stage modified e-Delphi study was conducted among experts in pediatric care, health education, and pain research. The researchers developed 35 topics by reviewing the Core Content of the Pediatric Pain PRN Curriculum. In the first and second rounds, experts rated the topics and suggested additional topics. Ratings were done on a four-point Likert scale with options ranging from 1 (not important at all) to 4 (very important). The outcomes from both rounds were analyzed based on the level of consensus. Consensus on a topic was set at a threshold of ≥ 70. A response rate of 88% (n = 22/25) and 100% (n = 22/22) was achieved for the first and second rounds, respectively. Experts rated 35 topics and 5 topics (the topic that failed to achieve consensus in the first round and four new ones generated from expert comments) in the first and second rounds, respectively. In the first round, experts agreed on 34 of the 35 topics (72.7%-90.9%) while all five topics achieved consensus (90.9%-100%) in the second round. Thus, 39 topics under the domains of pain theories, pediatric chronic pain, pain assessment, opioid risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS), biobehavioural strategies, procedural pain, acute pain management and reorientation were agreed on for inclusion in the PPEP. A high level of consensus was achieved among a multidisciplinary panel of experts on the content of the PPEP. This can serve as a valuable resource for interprofessional pain continuing education in low-resource settings. The topics can also be integrated into curricula for preregistration healthcare professionals in such settings.

在低资源环境下,对医疗保健专业人员的儿科疼痛教育计划内容达成共识:一项修改的e-Delphi研究。
医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)在改善住院儿童疼痛结局方面发挥关键作用。知识差距会严重阻碍医护人员提供最佳疼痛护理的能力。制定有针对性的教育干预措施来解决这些差距,需要清楚地了解基本疼痛相关主题培训的优先领域。在此背景下,本研究旨在就儿科疼痛教育计划(PPEP)的主题达成共识,以便在医护人员中进行继续专业教育。在儿科护理、健康教育和疼痛研究方面的专家中进行了一项两阶段的改进e-Delphi研究。研究人员通过回顾儿科疼痛PRN课程的核心内容开发了35个主题。在第一轮和第二轮中,专家对主题进行评分并提出额外的主题。评分采用李克特四分制,从1(完全不重要)到4(非常重要)。两轮的结果都是根据共识程度进行分析的。对某一主题的共识设定为≥70的阈值。第一轮和第二轮的应答率分别为88% (n = 22/25)和100% (n = 22/22)。专家在第一轮和第二轮分别对35个主题和5个主题(第一轮未达成共识的主题和专家评议产生的4个新主题)进行打分。在第一轮中,专家们对35个议题中的34个达成了共识(72.7%-90.9%),而在第二轮中,所有5个议题达成了共识(90.9%-100%)。因此,在疼痛理论、儿科慢性疼痛、疼痛评估、阿片类药物风险评估和缓解策略(REMS)、生物行为策略、程序性疼痛、急性疼痛管理和重新定向等领域下的39个主题被同意纳入PPEP。一个多学科专家小组就PPEP的内容达成了高度的共识。这可以作为一个宝贵的资源,在资源匮乏的情况下,跨专业的疼痛继续教育。这些主题也可以纳入此类环境中注册前保健专业人员的课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书