Exploring the effect of cognitive factors in lipreading: The roles of auditory–verbal learning, inhibition, verbal fluency, and visuospatial working memory

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY
Hale Hancer, Nilgun Ulger
{"title":"Exploring the effect of cognitive factors in lipreading: The roles of auditory–verbal learning, inhibition, verbal fluency, and visuospatial working memory","authors":"Hale Hancer,&nbsp;Nilgun Ulger","doi":"10.3758/s13414-026-03266-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Lipreading is a critical component of communication; however, substantial individual differences in performance have been consistently observed. Although several cognitive factors have been proposed as potential determinants of lipreading ability, empirical evidence supporting these associations is limited. This study investigated the roles of auditory–verbal learning, verbal fluency, inhibition, and visuospatial working memory in adults’ lipreading. The study was conducted in two phases. First, the Lipreading Test (LRT) was developed through a literature review, expert evaluation, and a preliminary study. The LRT consists of 50 items across phoneme, word, sentence, and question–answer subtests. Item analysis showed balanced difficulty (<i>pj</i> = 0.30–0.90) and strong discrimination (<i>dj</i> = 0.30–0.83). Data from 420 participants were used to establish the construct validity, discriminant validity, and reliability of the scale. The item–total correlations ranged from .501 to .898. Exploratory factor analysis (<i>n</i> = 170) revealed a two-factor structure (eigenvalue = 2.92) explaining 56.18% of the variance, confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis (<i>n</i> = 200). Discriminant validity analysis (<i>n</i> = 100) indicated that performance on the LRT demonstrated significant differentiation by gender and hearing loss onset. Reliability was evaluated using internal consistency (α = .831), test–retest correlations (<i>r</i> = .404–.961), and interrater reliability (κ = .91–.99). In phase 2, hierarchical regression (<i>n</i> = 96) indicated that gender, auditory–verbal learning, verbal fluency, visuospatial memory, and inhibition together accounted for 21.8% of variance in lipreading performance (<i>p</i> &lt; .05). Lipreading emerges from the combined influence of multiple cognitive processes, highlighting the importance of an integrated assessment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55433,"journal":{"name":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","volume":"88 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13414-026-03266-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lipreading is a critical component of communication; however, substantial individual differences in performance have been consistently observed. Although several cognitive factors have been proposed as potential determinants of lipreading ability, empirical evidence supporting these associations is limited. This study investigated the roles of auditory–verbal learning, verbal fluency, inhibition, and visuospatial working memory in adults’ lipreading. The study was conducted in two phases. First, the Lipreading Test (LRT) was developed through a literature review, expert evaluation, and a preliminary study. The LRT consists of 50 items across phoneme, word, sentence, and question–answer subtests. Item analysis showed balanced difficulty (pj = 0.30–0.90) and strong discrimination (dj = 0.30–0.83). Data from 420 participants were used to establish the construct validity, discriminant validity, and reliability of the scale. The item–total correlations ranged from .501 to .898. Exploratory factor analysis (n = 170) revealed a two-factor structure (eigenvalue = 2.92) explaining 56.18% of the variance, confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis (n = 200). Discriminant validity analysis (n = 100) indicated that performance on the LRT demonstrated significant differentiation by gender and hearing loss onset. Reliability was evaluated using internal consistency (α = .831), test–retest correlations (r = .404–.961), and interrater reliability (κ = .91–.99). In phase 2, hierarchical regression (n = 96) indicated that gender, auditory–verbal learning, verbal fluency, visuospatial memory, and inhibition together accounted for 21.8% of variance in lipreading performance (p < .05). Lipreading emerges from the combined influence of multiple cognitive processes, highlighting the importance of an integrated assessment.

探讨认知因素对唇读的影响:听觉-言语学习、抑制、言语流畅性和视觉空间工作记忆的作用。
唇读是沟通的重要组成部分;然而,人们一直观察到表现上的巨大个体差异。虽然一些认知因素被认为是唇读能力的潜在决定因素,但支持这些联系的经验证据有限。本研究探讨了听觉-言语学习、言语流畅性、抑制和视觉空间工作记忆在成人唇读中的作用。这项研究分两个阶段进行。首先,通过文献综述、专家评估和初步研究,开发了唇读测试(LRT)。LRT由50个项目组成,包括音素、单词、句子和问答子测试。项目分析显示平衡困难(pj = 0.30 ~ 0.90)和强分辨(dj = 0.30 ~ 0.83)。采用420名被试的数据对量表进行构念效度、判别效度和信度的检验。项目总数的相关性从。501到0.898。探索性因子分析(n = 170)显示双因子结构(特征值= 2.92)解释了56.18%的方差,验证性因子分析(n = 200)证实了这一点。判别效度分析(n = 100)表明,LRT的表现在性别和听力损失发病方面存在显著差异。信度采用内部一致性(α = .831)、重测相关性(r = .404-.961)和测者间信度(κ = .91-.99)进行评估。在第二阶段,层次回归(n = 96)表明,性别、听觉语言学习、语言流畅性、视觉空间记忆和抑制共同占唇读表现方差的21.8% (p < 0.05)。唇读产生于多种认知过程的综合影响,强调了综合评估的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
197
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics is an official journal of the Psychonomic Society. It spans all areas of research in sensory processes, perception, attention, and psychophysics. Most articles published are reports of experimental work; the journal also presents theoretical, integrative, and evaluative reviews. Commentary on issues of importance to researchers appears in a special section of the journal. Founded in 1966 as Perception & Psychophysics, the journal assumed its present name in 2009.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书