Evaluation of a Multidimensional Occupational Therapy Environmental Checklist for People Experiencing Delirium During Hospital Admission: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Sharon Neale, Erin McKnight, Renee Dixon, Danielle Hitch
{"title":"Evaluation of a Multidimensional Occupational Therapy Environmental Checklist for People Experiencing Delirium During Hospital Admission: A Quasi-Experimental Study.","authors":"Sharon Neale, Erin McKnight, Renee Dixon, Danielle Hitch","doi":"10.1111/ajag.70165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Delirium, an acute medical emergency, significantly impacts older adults, increasing morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs (estimated at $8.8 billion annually in Australia). Environmental modifications in hospital wards are underexplored despite their potential to mitigate delirium's effects. This study evaluated a multidimensional occupational therapy environmental checklist's impact on functional and service outcomes for hospitalised delirium patients compared to standard care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental design was employed, collecting pre- and post-intervention data from 100 electronic medical records (50 comparison, 50 intervention) on a Geriatric Evaluation and Management ward in Melbourne, Australia. The checklist, implemented by occupational therapists and allied health assistants, targeted orientation, object accessibility, daily routines and safety. Outcomes included length of stay, adverse events (e.g., falls, pressure injuries) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores. Descriptive statistics, t-tests and χ<sup>2</sup> tests were conducted using SPSS Statistics 28 (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention group showed a 27% reduction in total adverse events (comparison: n = 37; intervention: n = 27) and significantly higher FIM scores at discharge (motor: t = -2.38, p = 0.02; cognitive: t = -2.62, p = 0.01; total: t = -3.24, p < 0.001). However, length of stay (comparison: M = 28.2 days; intervention: M = 29.36 days; t = -0.20, p = 0.84) and adverse event rates (χ<sup>2</sup> = 1.48, p = 0.22) did not differ significantly. The intervention group had a higher fall admission rate (36% vs. 2%; χ<sup>2</sup> = 20.38, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The checklist enhances functional recovery in older adults with delirium, reducing adverse events. Larger, multi-site studies are needed to confirm efficacy and generalisability, supporting occupational therapy's role in delirium management.</p>","PeriodicalId":55431,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","volume":"45 2","pages":"e70165"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13108554/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.70165","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Delirium, an acute medical emergency, significantly impacts older adults, increasing morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs (estimated at $8.8 billion annually in Australia). Environmental modifications in hospital wards are underexplored despite their potential to mitigate delirium's effects. This study evaluated a multidimensional occupational therapy environmental checklist's impact on functional and service outcomes for hospitalised delirium patients compared to standard care.

Methods: A quasi-experimental design was employed, collecting pre- and post-intervention data from 100 electronic medical records (50 comparison, 50 intervention) on a Geriatric Evaluation and Management ward in Melbourne, Australia. The checklist, implemented by occupational therapists and allied health assistants, targeted orientation, object accessibility, daily routines and safety. Outcomes included length of stay, adverse events (e.g., falls, pressure injuries) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores. Descriptive statistics, t-tests and χ2 tests were conducted using SPSS Statistics 28 (p < 0.05).

Results: The intervention group showed a 27% reduction in total adverse events (comparison: n = 37; intervention: n = 27) and significantly higher FIM scores at discharge (motor: t = -2.38, p = 0.02; cognitive: t = -2.62, p = 0.01; total: t = -3.24, p < 0.001). However, length of stay (comparison: M = 28.2 days; intervention: M = 29.36 days; t = -0.20, p = 0.84) and adverse event rates (χ2 = 1.48, p = 0.22) did not differ significantly. The intervention group had a higher fall admission rate (36% vs. 2%; χ2 = 20.38, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The checklist enhances functional recovery in older adults with delirium, reducing adverse events. Larger, multi-site studies are needed to confirm efficacy and generalisability, supporting occupational therapy's role in delirium management.

对住院期间谵妄患者的多维职业治疗环境检查表的评估:一项准实验研究。
目的:谵妄是一种急性医疗紧急情况,严重影响老年人,增加发病率、死亡率和医疗保健费用(估计在澳大利亚每年88亿美元)。尽管医院病房的环境改变有可能减轻谵妄的影响,但它们尚未得到充分的探索。本研究评估了与标准治疗相比,多维职业治疗环境检查表对住院谵妄患者功能和服务结果的影响。方法:采用准实验设计,收集澳大利亚墨尔本某老年评估与管理病房100份电子病历(对照50份,干预50份)干预前后的数据。这份清单由职业治疗师和专职保健助理执行,包括定向指导、物品可及性、日常生活和安全。结果包括住院时间、不良事件(如跌倒、压伤)和功能独立测量(FIM)评分。结果:干预组总不良事件减少27%(比较:n = 37;干预:n = 27),出院时FIM评分显著提高(运动:t = -2.38, p = 0.02;认知:t = -2.62, p = 0.01;总:t = -3.24, p 2 = 1.48, p = 0.22),差异无统计学意义。干预组跌倒入院率较高(36% vs. 2%; χ2 = 20.38, p)。结论:检查表可促进老年谵妄患者功能恢复,减少不良事件。需要更大规模、多地点的研究来证实其有效性和普遍性,以支持职业疗法在谵妄管理中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Australasian Journal on Ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal on Ageing is a peer reviewed journal, which publishes original work in any area of gerontology and geriatric medicine. It welcomes international submissions, particularly from authors in the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书