Dynamic Parameters within the First 72 H of ICU Admission Predict Extubation Failure and 28-Day Mortality in Severe Pneumonia-Induced ARDS: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Chen Wang, Yalong Liu, Wenqing Xu, Hanhan Hong
{"title":"Dynamic Parameters within the First 72 H of ICU Admission Predict Extubation Failure and 28-Day Mortality in Severe Pneumonia-Induced ARDS: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Chen Wang, Yalong Liu, Wenqing Xu, Hanhan Hong","doi":"10.1111/crj.70189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate dynamic parameter changes within 72 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission for predicting extubation failure and 28-day mortality in patients with severe pneumonia-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study enrolled 424 adults with severe pneumonia-induced ARDS receiving invasive ventilation ≥ 48 h during January 2023-August 2025. We collected clinical data and calculated 72-h changes (Δ) in key parameters: physiological stress [maximum respiratory rate (RR), mean heart rate (HR)] and disease progression [ΔPaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>, Δ blood lactate (BLA), Δ procalcitonin (PCT), Δ Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)]. Outcomes were extubation failure (first spontaneous breathing trial failure or reintubation ≤ 48 h) and 28-day mortality. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression models were built, with discrimination assessed by ROC curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Extubation failure and 28-day mortality rates were 23.82% (101/424) and 29.48% (125/424), respectively. For extubation failure, independent risk factors included older age, higher APACHE II score at admission, immunosuppression, higher maximum RR, higher mean HR, and increased ΔBLA, ΔPCT, and ΔSOFA (protective factor: increased ΔPaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>) (p < 0.05). The prediction model had an AUC of 0.912 (95% CI, 0.883-0.941). For 28-day mortality, independent risk factors were higher APACHE II score at admission, higher maximum RR, increased ΔBLA, and increased ΔSOFA (p < 0.05), with a time-dependent AUC of 0.755 (95% CI, 0.729-0.781). A significant association was observed between extubation failure and 28-day mortality, with a markedly higher mortality rate in patients with extubation failure compared to those with successful extubation (81.19% vs. 13.31%, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dynamic parameters within 72 h of ICU admission are predictors of extubation failure and 28-day mortality in severe pneumonia-induced ARDS, offering a tool for early risk stratification. Extubation failure was also strongly associated with increased short-term mortality, underscoring its clinical significance as an adverse outcome during the disease course.</p>","PeriodicalId":55247,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":"20 5","pages":"e70189"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13106213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.70189","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate dynamic parameter changes within 72 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission for predicting extubation failure and 28-day mortality in patients with severe pneumonia-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study enrolled 424 adults with severe pneumonia-induced ARDS receiving invasive ventilation ≥ 48 h during January 2023-August 2025. We collected clinical data and calculated 72-h changes (Δ) in key parameters: physiological stress [maximum respiratory rate (RR), mean heart rate (HR)] and disease progression [ΔPaO2/FiO2, Δ blood lactate (BLA), Δ procalcitonin (PCT), Δ Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)]. Outcomes were extubation failure (first spontaneous breathing trial failure or reintubation ≤ 48 h) and 28-day mortality. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression models were built, with discrimination assessed by ROC curves.

Results: Extubation failure and 28-day mortality rates were 23.82% (101/424) and 29.48% (125/424), respectively. For extubation failure, independent risk factors included older age, higher APACHE II score at admission, immunosuppression, higher maximum RR, higher mean HR, and increased ΔBLA, ΔPCT, and ΔSOFA (protective factor: increased ΔPaO2/FiO2) (p < 0.05). The prediction model had an AUC of 0.912 (95% CI, 0.883-0.941). For 28-day mortality, independent risk factors were higher APACHE II score at admission, higher maximum RR, increased ΔBLA, and increased ΔSOFA (p < 0.05), with a time-dependent AUC of 0.755 (95% CI, 0.729-0.781). A significant association was observed between extubation failure and 28-day mortality, with a markedly higher mortality rate in patients with extubation failure compared to those with successful extubation (81.19% vs. 13.31%, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Dynamic parameters within 72 h of ICU admission are predictors of extubation failure and 28-day mortality in severe pneumonia-induced ARDS, offering a tool for early risk stratification. Extubation failure was also strongly associated with increased short-term mortality, underscoring its clinical significance as an adverse outcome during the disease course.

ICU入院前72小时内的动态参数预测严重肺炎引起的ARDS拔管失败和28天死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究
目的:评价重症监护病房(ICU)入院72 h内动态参数变化对预测重症肺炎急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者拔管失败和28天死亡率的影响。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了2023年1月至2025年8月期间接受有创通气≥48小时的424例严重肺炎所致ARDS成人患者。我们收集临床数据并计算72小时内关键参数的变化(Δ):生理应激[最大呼吸速率(RR),平均心率(HR)]和疾病进展[ΔPaO2/FiO2, Δ血乳酸(BLA), Δ降钙素原(PCT), Δ序期器官衰竭评估(SOFA)]。结果为拔管失败(首次自主呼吸试验失败或重新插管≤48 h)和28天死亡率。建立多变量logistic和Cox回归模型,用ROC曲线评价判别性。结果:拔管失败和28天死亡率分别为23.82%(101/424)和29.48%(125/424)。对于拔管失败,独立危险因素包括年龄较大、入院时APACHEⅱ评分较高、免疫抑制、最大RR较高、平均HR较高、ΔBLA、ΔPCT和ΔSOFA升高(保护因素:ΔPaO2/FiO2升高)(p)。结论:ICU入院72 h内动态参数是重症肺炎所致ARDS拔管失败和28天死亡率的预测因子,为早期风险分层提供了工具。拔管失败也与短期死亡率增加密切相关,强调其作为疾病过程中不良结果的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Respiratory Journal
Clinical Respiratory Journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Overview Effective with the 2016 volume, this journal will be published in an online-only format. Aims and Scope The Clinical Respiratory Journal (CRJ) provides a forum for clinical research in all areas of respiratory medicine from clinical lung disease to basic research relevant to the clinic. We publish original research, review articles, case studies, editorials and book reviews in all areas of clinical lung disease including: Asthma Allergy COPD Non-invasive ventilation Sleep related breathing disorders Interstitial lung diseases Lung cancer Clinical genetics Rhinitis Airway and lung infection Epidemiology Pediatrics CRJ provides a fast-track service for selected Phase II and Phase III trial studies. Keywords Clinical Respiratory Journal, respiratory, pulmonary, medicine, clinical, lung disease, Abstracting and Indexing Information Academic Search (EBSCO Publishing) Academic Search Alumni Edition (EBSCO Publishing) Embase (Elsevier) Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest) Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest) HEED: Health Economic Evaluations Database (Wiley-Blackwell) Hospital Premium Collection (ProQuest) Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics) MEDLINE/PubMed (NLM) ProQuest Central (ProQuest) Science Citation Index Expanded (Clarivate Analytics) SCOPUS (Elsevier)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书