Renal denervation: from establishing effectiveness to measuring success.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Current Opinion in Cardiology Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-27 DOI:10.1097/HCO.0000000000001299
Hyeok-Hee Lee, Anna K Krawisz, Eric A Secemsky
{"title":"Renal denervation: from establishing effectiveness to measuring success.","authors":"Hyeok-Hee Lee, Anna K Krawisz, Eric A Secemsky","doi":"10.1097/HCO.0000000000001299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Renal denervation has emerged as a new therapeutic option for blood pressure (BP) control and is now incorporated into contemporary hypertension guidelines. Here, we review the evolution of evidence for renal denervation, approaches to assessing treatment response, and emerging technological developments.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Early non-sham-controlled trials of renal denervation showed substantial reductions in BP, whereas the first sham-controlled trial, SYMPLICITY HTN-3, yielded neutral findings. To address its limitations, subsequent trials incorporated key design modifications - including strict restriction of changes in background antihypertensive medications, procedural standardization, and separate conduct of trials in \"on-medication\" and \"off-medication\" cohorts - and have since consistently demonstrated the efficacy of renal denervation. In these studies, efficacy was assessed primarily by reductions in systolic BP, with additional measures including reductions in diastolic BP and antihypertensive medication burden. Alternative ablative mechanisms (e.g., alcohol-mediated neurolysis) are currently under investigation, along with multi-organ denervation approaches aimed at augmenting BP reduction while providing additional metabolic benefits.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Evidence supporting renal denervation has continued to accumulate, demonstrating consistent BP reductions. The field is evolving, with new approaches using alternative ablative mechanisms or targeting multi-organ sympathetic pathways on the horizon.</p>","PeriodicalId":55197,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"251-259"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0000000000001299","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Renal denervation has emerged as a new therapeutic option for blood pressure (BP) control and is now incorporated into contemporary hypertension guidelines. Here, we review the evolution of evidence for renal denervation, approaches to assessing treatment response, and emerging technological developments.

Recent findings: Early non-sham-controlled trials of renal denervation showed substantial reductions in BP, whereas the first sham-controlled trial, SYMPLICITY HTN-3, yielded neutral findings. To address its limitations, subsequent trials incorporated key design modifications - including strict restriction of changes in background antihypertensive medications, procedural standardization, and separate conduct of trials in "on-medication" and "off-medication" cohorts - and have since consistently demonstrated the efficacy of renal denervation. In these studies, efficacy was assessed primarily by reductions in systolic BP, with additional measures including reductions in diastolic BP and antihypertensive medication burden. Alternative ablative mechanisms (e.g., alcohol-mediated neurolysis) are currently under investigation, along with multi-organ denervation approaches aimed at augmenting BP reduction while providing additional metabolic benefits.

Summary: Evidence supporting renal denervation has continued to accumulate, demonstrating consistent BP reductions. The field is evolving, with new approaches using alternative ablative mechanisms or targeting multi-organ sympathetic pathways on the horizon.

肾去神经:从建立有效性到衡量成功。
回顾目的:肾去神经支配已成为控制血压(BP)的一种新的治疗选择,现在已被纳入当代高血压指南。在这里,我们回顾了肾去神经的证据的演变,评估治疗反应的方法,以及新兴的技术发展。近期发现:早期非假对照肾去神经试验显示血压显著降低,而第一个假对照试验SYMPLICITY HTN-3的结果为中性。为了解决其局限性,随后的试验纳入了关键的设计修改-包括严格限制背景抗高血压药物的变化,程序标准化,以及在“服药”和“停药”队列中单独进行试验-并且此后一直证明了肾去神经的有效性。在这些研究中,主要通过收缩压的降低来评估疗效,其他措施包括舒张压的降低和抗高血压药物负担。目前正在研究其他消融机制(如酒精介导的神经松解),以及旨在增强血压降低同时提供额外代谢益处的多器官去神经支配方法。总结:支持肾去神经支配的证据不断积累,显示血压持续降低。该领域正在发展,新方法使用替代烧蚀机制或针对多器官交感神经通路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Cardiology
Current Opinion in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Cardiology is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fourteen disciplines published across the year – including arrhythmias, molecular genetics, HDL cholesterol and clinical trials – every issue also contains annotated reference detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书