Assessing cognitive load in drivers during tunnel approach under combined fog and nighttime conditions based on fixation behavior.

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to investigate the impact of combined fog and nighttime conditions on drivers' cognitive load during tunnel approach, as reflected through fixation behavior. Specifically, it examines how these compounded adverse conditions influence visual attention patterns, including fixation duration, frequency, and spatial dispersion.

Methods: A real-world driving experiment was conducted with 30 licensed drivers on the Xinjin Expressway. Eye movement data were collected using a Dikablis Pro eye tracker across four environmental scenarios: clear-day, foggy-day, clear-night, and foggy-night. The analysis focused on the tunnel approach zone, defined as the 10-s travel distance preceding the tunnel portal. Dependent variables included fixation duration, fixation frequency, horizontal fixation deviation, and vertical fixation deviation. One-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post-hoc tests were employed to compare these metrics across scenarios.

Results: The results revealed systematic variations in fixation behavior with increasing environmental complexity. Fixation duration was longest under foggy-night conditions (689.82 ± 30.4 ms) and shortest under clear-day conditions (325.59 ± 34.52 ms). Fixation frequency decreased progressively, with the highest rate in clear-day conditions (2.85 ± 0.18 Hz) and the lowest in foggy-night conditions (1.55 ± 0.17 Hz). Horizontal fixation deviation was largest in clear-day conditions (18.93 ± 2.91°) and smallest in foggy-night conditions (6.08 ± 1.68°), indicating lateral gaze constriction. Conversely, vertical fixation deviation increased significantly under adverse conditions, peaking in foggy-night scenarios (26.21 ± 3.74°), suggesting compensatory vertical scanning. All pairwise comparisons between scenarios were statistically significant (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: The combined effects of fog and nighttime conditions significantly elevate drivers' cognitive load during tunnel approaches, manifesting as prolonged information processing, reduced attentional shifting, lateral visual field narrowing, and compensatory vertical search. These findings confirm the sensitivity of fixation-based metrics as indicators of cognitive load under compounded environmental stressors. The study provides empirical evidence for developing context-aware safety interventions, such as optimized tunnel lighting, adaptive traffic management, and enhanced driver assistance systems, tailored to mitigate cognitive overload in high-risk driving scenarios.